The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Case Name	Comm Number	Date	Outcome
W.J. v. Austria	5/1990	22 November 1990	Inadmissible
R.E.G. v. Turkey	4/1990	29 April 1991	Inadmissible
H. U. P. v. Spain	6/1990	12 November 1991	Inadmissible
L. B. v. Spain	9/1991	18 November 1991	Inadmissible
Halimi-Nedzibi v. Austria	8/1991	05 May 1992	Admissible
Barakat v. Tunisia	14/1994	05 May 1994	Inadmissible
J. E. and E. B. v. Spain	10/1993	14 November 1994	Inadmissible
X. v. Switzerland	17/1994	17 November 1994	Inadmissible
Y. v. Switzerland	18/1994	17 November 1994	Inadmissible
A. E. v. Switzerland	24/1995	02 May 1995	Inadmissible
M.A. v. Canada	22/1995	03 May 1995	Inadmissible
X. v. Spain	23/1995	15 November 1995	Inadmissible
N.D. v. France	32/1995	20 November 1995	Inadmissible
X. and Y. v. The Netherlands	31/1995	20 November 1995	Inadmissible
P. M. P. K. v. Sweden	30/1995	20 November 1995	Inadmissible
X. v. Canada	26/1995	20 November 1995	Inadmissible
K.K.H. v. Canada	35/1995	22 November 1995	Inadmissible
Le Gayic et al. v. France	46/1996	09 May 1997	Inadmissible
D. v. France	45/1996	10 November 1997	Inadmissible
R. v. France	52/1996	10 November 1997	Inadmissible
L. M. V. R. G. and M. A. B. C. v. Sweden	64/1997	19 November 1997	Inadmissible
R.K. v. Canada	42/1996	20 November 1997	Inadmissible
J. M.. U. M. v. Sweden	58/1996	15 May 1998	Inadmissible
V.V. v. Canada	47/1996	19 May 1998	Inadmissible
H. W. A. v. Switzerland	48/1996	20 May 1998	Inadmissible
P. S. S. v Canada	66/1997	13 November 1998	Inadmissible
Akhimien v. Canada	67/1997	17 November 1998	Inadmissible
E.H. v. Hungary	62/1996	10 May 1999	Inadmissible
K.N. v. France	93/1997	18 November 1999	Inadmissible
P.S. v. Canada	86/1997	18 November 1999	Inadmissible
S. H. v. Norway	121/1998	19 November 1999	Inadmissible
Z. T. v. Norway	127/1999	19 November 1999	Inadmissible
A. G. v. Sweden	140/1999	02 May 2000	Inadmissible
L.O. v. Canada	95/1997	19 May 2000	Inadmissible
P. R. v. Spain	160/2000	23 November 2000	Inadmissible
A. R. v. Sweden	170/2000	23 November 2001	Inadmissible
Roitman Rosenmann v. Spain	176/2000	30 April 2002	Inadmissible
H. I. A. v. Sweden	216/2002	02 May 2003	Inadmissible
A. T. A. v. Switzerland	236/2003	11 November 2003	Inadmissible
Helle Jensen v. Denmark	202/2002	05 May 2004	Inadmissible
S. A. v. Sweden	243/2004	06 May 2004	Inadmissible
H. S. V. v. Sweden	229/2003	12 May 2004	Inadmissible
R. S. v. Denmark	225/2003	19 May 2004	Inadmissible
L.J.R.C. v. Sweden	218/2002	22 November 2004	Inadmissible
H.A.S.V. and F.O.C. v. Canada	163/2000	24 November 2004	Inadmissible
P.A.C. v. Australia	211/2002	03 May 2005	Inadmissible
A.H. v. Sweden	250/2004	15 November 2005	Inadmissible
R.T. v. Switzerland	242/2003	24 November 2005	Inadmissible
A.A. v. Azerbaijan	247/2004	25 November 2005	Inadmissible
Komba v. Switzerland	248/2004	08 May 2006	Inadmissible
Aung v. Canada	273/2005	15 May 2006	Inadmissible
H.S.T. v. Norway	288/2006	16 November 2006	Inadmissible
R.S.A.N. v. Canada	284/2006	17 November 2006	Inadmissible
A.R.A. v. Sweden	305/2006	30 April 2007	Inadmiss
L. Z. B. v. Canada	304/2006	08 November 2007	Inadmissible
A. B. A. O. v. France	264/2005	08 November 2007	Inadmissible
K. A. v. Sweden	308/2006	16 November 2007	Inadmissible

Information is as of 6 June 2008.

CERD, CCPR, CAT, CEDAW, CMW, Disability Convention and Enforced disappearances Convention have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW and Enforced disappearances Convention complaint mechanisms are not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
decisions to deal jointly with cases
admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
final views.

The Human Rights Committee (under CCPR), the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (under CERD), the Committee Against Torture (under CAT) and the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (under CEDAW) also formally follow up on final Views where a violation has been found. This information is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".