Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CAT

List of all admissibility decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Outcome
O.R., M.M., and M.S. v. Argentina 1, 2, & 3/1988 23 November 1989 Inadmissible
W.J. v. Austria 5/1990 22 November 1990 Inadmissible
R.E.G. v. Turkey 4/1990 29 April 1991 Inadmissible
H. U. P. v. Spain 6/1990 12 November 1991 Inadmissible
L. B. v. Spain 9/1991 18 November 1991 Inadmissible
Halimi-Nedzibi v. Austria 8/1991 05 May 1992 Admissible
Barakat v. Tunisia 14/1994 05 May 1994 Inadmissible
J. E. and E. B. v. Spain 10/1993 14 November 1994 Inadmissible
X. v. Switzerland 17/1994 17 November 1994 Inadmissible
Y. v. Switzerland 18/1994 17 November 1994 Inadmissible
A. E. v. Switzerland 24/1995 02 May 1995 Inadmissible
M.A. v. Canada 22/1995 03 May 1995 Inadmissible
X. v. Spain 23/1995 15 November 1995 Inadmissible
N.D. v. France 32/1995 20 November 1995 Inadmissible
X. and Y. v. The Netherlands 31/1995 20 November 1995 Inadmissible
P. M. P. K. v. Sweden 30/1995 20 November 1995 Inadmissible
X. v. Canada 26/1995 20 November 1995 Inadmissible
K.K.H. v. Canada 35/1995 22 November 1995 Inadmissible
Le Gayic et al. v. France 46/1996 09 May 1997 Inadmissible
D. v. France 45/1996 10 November 1997 Inadmissible
R. v. France 52/1996 10 November 1997 Inadmissible
L. M. V. R. G. and M. A. B. C. v. Sweden 64/1997 19 November 1997 Inadmissible
R.K. v. Canada 42/1996 20 November 1997 Inadmissible
J. M. U. M. v. Sweden 58/1996 15 May 1998 Inadmissible
V.V. v. Canada 47/1996 19 May 1998 Inadmissible
H. W. A. v. Switzerland 48/1996 20 May 1998 Inadmissible
P. S. S. v Canada 66/1997 13 November 1998 Inadmissible
Akhimien v. Canada 67/1997 17 November 1998 Inadmissible
E.H. v. Hungary 62/1996 10 May 1999 Inadmissible
K.N. v. France 93/1997 18 November 1999 Inadmissible
P.S. v. Canada 86/1997 18 November 1999 Inadmissible
S. H. v. Norway 121/1998 19 November 1999 Inadmissible
Z. T. v. Norway 127/1999 19 November 1999 Inadmissible
A. G. v. Sweden 140/1999 02 May 2000 Inadmissible
L.O. v. Canada 95/1997 19 May 2000 Inadmissible
P. R. v. Spain 160/2000 23 November 2000 Inadmissible
A. R. v. Sweden 170/2000 23 November 2001 Inadmissible
Roitman Rosenmann v. Spain 176/2000 30 April 2002 Inadmissible
H. I. A. v. Sweden 216/2002 02 May 2003 Inadmissible
A. T. A. v. Switzerland 236/2003 11 November 2003 Inadmissible
Helle Jensen v. Denmark 202/2002 05 May 2004 Inadmissible
S. A. v. Sweden 243/2004 06 May 2004 Inadmissible
H. S. V. v. Sweden 229/2003 12 May 2004 Inadmissible
R. S. v. Denmark 225/2003 19 May 2004 Inadmissible
L.J.R.C. v. Sweden 218/2002 22 November 2004 Inadmissible
H.A.S.V. and F.O.C. v. Canada 163/2000 24 November 2004 Inadmissible
P.A.C. v. Australia 211/2002 03 May 2005 Inadmissible
A.H. v. Sweden 250/2004 15 November 2005 Inadmissible
R.T. v. Switzerland 242/2003 24 November 2005 Inadmissible
A.A. v. Azerbaijan 247/2004 25 November 2005 Inadmissible
A. K. v. Switzerland 248/2004 08 May 2006 Inadmissible
Aung v. Canada 273/2005 15 May 2006 Inadmissible
H.S.T. v. Norway 288/2006 16 November 2006 Inadmissible
R.S.A.N. v. Canada 284/2006 17 November 2006 Inadmissible
A.R.A. v. Sweden 305/2006 30 April 2007 Inadmissible
A. B. A. O. v. France 264/2005 08 November 2007 Inadmissible
L. Z. B. v. Canada 304/2006 08 November 2007 Inadmissible
K. A. v. Sweden 308/2006 16 November 2007 Inadmissible
P.K. et al. v. Spain 323/2007 10 November 2008 Inadmissible
E.Y. v. Canada 307/2006 04 November 2009 Inadmissible
H. E-M. v. Canada 395/2009 23 May 2011 Inadmissible
F.M-M. v. Switzerland 399/2009 26 May 2011 Inadmissible
Abdussamatov et. al v. Kazakhstan 444/2010 15 November 2011 Admissible
S. K. and R. K. v. Sweden 365/2008 21 November 2011 Inadmissible
B.M.S. v. Sweden 437/2010 12 November 2012 Inadmissible
S.A.C. v. Monaco 346/2008 13 November 2012 Inadmissible
I.A.F.B. v. Sweden 425/2010 13 November 2012 Inadmissible
E.E. v. Russian Federation 479/2011 24 May 2013 Inadmissible
Z v. Australia 511/2012 26 November 2014 Inadmissible
Y v. Canada 512/2012 28 July 2015 Inadmissible
Z.H. v. Canada 604/2014 20 November 2015 Inadmissible
U. v. Sweden 643/2014 23 November 2015 Inadmissible
N.B. v. Russian Federation 577/2013 25 November 2015 Inadmissible
Z. v. Switzerland 545/2013 25 November 2015 Inadmissible
H.B.A. et al. v. Canada 536/2013 02 December 2015 Inadmissible
B.R. v. Italy 598/2014 29 April 2016 Inadmissible
C.N. v. Denmark 709/2015 29 April 2016 Inadmissible
J. B. v. Canada 529/2012 06 May 2016 Inadmissible
I.M. and V.Z. v. Denmark 593/2014 16 May 2016 Inadmissible
H. v. Sweden 627/2014 05 August 2016 Inadmissible
R.K. v. Denmark 607/2014 12 August 2016 Inadmissible
X et al. v. Switzerland 697/2015 25 November 2016 Inadmissible
R.M. v. Sweden 610/2014 30 November 2016 Inadmissible
X v. Switzerland 686/2015 05 December 2016 Inadmissible
D.R. v. Australia 14/2013 24 March 2017 Inadmissible
L.M.L. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 27/2015 24 March 2017 Inadmissible
D.L. v. Sweden 31/2015 24 March 2017 Inadmissible
A.H.S. v. Denmark 2473/2014 28 March 2017 Inadmissible
M.Z. v. Kazakhstan 2145/2012 28 March 2017 Inadmissible
M.B. v. New Zealand 2934/2017 28 March 2017 Inadmissible
N.R. v. New Zealand 2801/2016 28 March 2017 Inadmissible
I.T. v. Kazakhstan 2140/2012 28 March 2017 Inadmissible
M.J.K. v. Denmark 2338/2014 28 March 2017 Inadmissible
M. A. K. v. Belgium 2148/2012 28 March 2017 Inadmissible
B.H. v. Austria 2088/2011 28 March 2017 Inadmissible
D and E v. Denmark 2293/2013 28 March 2017 Inadmissible

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of April 2017. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".