Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CAT - Canada

List of all admissibility decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Outcome
M.A. v. Canada 22/1995 03 May 1995 Inadmissible
X. v. Canada 26/1995 20 November 1995 Inadmissible
K.K.H. v. Canada 35/1995 22 November 1995 Inadmissible
R.K. v. Canada 42/1996 20 November 1997 Inadmissible
V.V. v. Canada 47/1996 19 May 1998 Inadmissible
P. S. S. v Canada 66/1997 13 November 1998 Inadmissible
Akhimien v. Canada 67/1997 17 November 1998 Inadmissible
P.S. v. Canada 86/1997 18 November 1999 Inadmissible
L.O. v. Canada 95/1997 19 May 2000 Inadmissible
H.A.S.V. and F.O.C. v. Canada 163/2000 24 November 2004 Inadmissible
Aung v. Canada 273/2005 15 May 2006 Inadmissible
R.S.A.N. v. Canada 284/2006 17 November 2006 Inadmissible
L. Z. B. v. Canada 304/2006 08 November 2007 Inadmissible
E.Y. v. Canada 307/2006 04 November 2009 Inadmissible
H. E-M. v. Canada 395/2009 23 May 2011 Inadmissible
Y v. Canada 512/2012 28 July 2015 Inadmissible
Z.H. v. Canada 604/2014 20 November 2015 Inadmissible
H.B.A. et al. v. Canada 536/2013 02 December 2015 Inadmissible
J. B. v. Canada 529/2012 06 May 2016 Inadmissible
Z.A.H. v. Canada 687/2015 11 August 2017 Inadmissible

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".