The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Case Name	Comm Number	Date	Articles	Outcome
Khan v. Canada	15/1994	15 November 1994	3	Violation
P.Q.L. v. Canada	57/1996	17 November 1997	3	No Violation
T.P.S. v. Canada	99/1997	16 May 2000	3	No Violation
S.V. v. Canada	49/1996	15 May 2001	1, 3	No Violation
Z.Z. v. Canada	123/1998	15 May 2001	3	No Violation
B.S. v. Canada	166/2000	14 November 2001	3,16	No Violation
V. N. I. M. v. Canada	119/1998	12 November 2002	3	No Violation
B. S. S. v. Canada	183/2001	12 May 2004	3, 16	No Violation
Falcón Ríos v. Canada	133/1999	23 November 2004	3	Violation
S.S.S. v. Canada	245/2004	16 November 2005	3	No Violation
Dadar v. Canada	258/2004	23 November 2005	3	Violation
S.P.A. v. Canada	282/2005	16 November 2006	3	No Violation
C.A.R.M. et al. v. Canada	298/2006	18 May 2007	3	No Violation
Sogi v. Canada	297/2006	16 November 2007	3	Violation
J.A.M.O. v. Canada	293/2006	09 May 2008	293/2006	No Violation

Information is as of 6 June 2008.

CERD, CCPR, CAT, CEDAW, CMW, Disability Convention and Enforced disappearances Convention have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW and Enforced disappearances Convention complaint mechanisms are not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
decisions to deal jointly with cases
admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
final views.

The Human Rights Committee (under CCPR), the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (under CERD), the Committee Against Torture (under CAT) and the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (under CEDAW) also formally follow up on final Views where a violation has been found. This information is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".