Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - Bolivia

Complete list of decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
Penarrieta et al. v. Bolivia 176/1984 02 November 1987 7, 9(3), 10(1), 14(3b) Violation
Fillastre and Bizouarn v. Bolivia 336/1988 06 November 1990   Admissible
Fillastre and Bizouarn v. Bolivia 336/1988 05 November 1991 9(2, 3), 10(1), 14(3b,c,d) Violation
Mendoza et al v. Bolivia 2491/2014 21 July 2017 14(1), 14(2), 14(3)(a), 14(3)(e), 14(5) Inadmissible
Rebeca Elvira Delgado Burgoa v. Bolivia 2628/2015 28 March 2018 2 (1), 2 (2), 2 (3), 14 (1), 25, 26 Violation
Eduardo Humberto Maldonado Iporre v. Bolivia 2629/2015 28 March 2018 2 (13), 14 (1), 25, 26 Violation

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".