Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - Canada

List of all final views

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
Lovelace v. Canada 24/1977 (R.6/24) 30 July 1981 2, 3, 12, 23, 26 27 Violation
Pinkney v. Canada 27/1977 (R.7/27) 29 October 1981 10(1, 2), 14(3c, 5), 17(1) Violation
Van Duzen v. Canada 50/1979 (R.12/50) 07 April 1982 15(1) No Violation
MacIsaac v. Canada 55/1979 14 October 1982 15(1) No Violation
Bhinder v. Canada 208/1986 09 November 1989 18, 26 No Violation
Lubicon Lake Band v. Canada 167/1984 26 March 1990 27, 1 Violation
Marshall et al. v. Canada 205/1986 04 November 1991 25(a) No Violation
Ballantyne, Davidson and McIntyre v. Canada 359/1989 & 385/1989 31 March 1993 19, 26, 27 Violation
Kindler v. Canada 470/1991 30 July 1993 6, 7 No Violation
Ng v. Canada 469/1991 05 November 1993 6(1, 2), 7, 10 Violation
Singer v. Canada 455/1991 26 July 1994 19(2) Violation
Cox v. Canada 539/1993 31 October 1994 6, 7,14, 26 No Violation
Stewart v. Canada 538/1993 01 November 1996 12(4), 17, 23 No Violation
Canepa v. Canada 558/1993 03 April 1997 7, 12(4), 17 No Violation
Gauthier v. Canada 633/1995 07 April 1999 19(2,3) Violation
Waldman v. Canada 694/1996 03 November 1999 26 Violation
Ross v. Canada 736/1997 18 October 2000 18, 19 No Violation
Judge v. Canada 829/1998 05 August 2003 2(3), 6, 6(1, 2) Violation
Ahani v. Canada 1051/2002 29 March 2004 7, 9(1, 4), 13 Violation
Howard v. Canada 879/1999 26 July 2005 27 No Violation
Obodzinsky v. Canada 1124/2002 19 March 2007 7 No Violation
J. T. v. Canada 1052/2002 20 March 2007 2, 2(3a),14(1), 17, 23, 24 Violation
Dauphin v. Canada 1792/2008 28 July 2009 17, 23(1) Violation
Dumont v. Canada 1467/2006 16 March 2010 2(3), 14(6) Violation
Hamida v. Canada 1544/2007 18 March 2010 2(1), 2(3)(a), 7 Violation
Kaba v. Canada 1465/2006 25 March 2010 7, 24(1) Violation
Pillai et al. v. Canada 1763/2008 25 March 2011 7 Violation
Warsame v. Canada 1959/2010 21 July 2011 2(3), 6(1), 7, 12(4), 17, 23(1) Violation
Thuraisamy v. Canada 1912/2009 31 October 2012 6(1), 7, 9(1) Violation
Shakeel v. Canada 1881/2009 24 July 2013 2, 6, 7, 9, 14 Violation
Choudhary v. Canada 1898/2009 28 October 2013 2, 6, 7, 9, 13, 14, 17, 23, 24 Violation
A.H.G. v. Canada 2091/2011 25 March 2015 2, 6, 17, 21, 23 Violation
Y. v. Canada, Sri Lanka 2280/2013 22 July 2015 6, 7, 9 (1) No Violation
F.M. v. Canada 2284/2013 05 November 2015 2, 6(1), 7, 13 No Violation
X v. Canada 2366/2014 05 November 2015 6, 7, 9, 19 26 No Violation
Y v. Canada 2327/2014 10 March 2016 26, 3, 5(2(b), 6(1), 7, 9(1) No Violation
Y. v. Canada 2314/2013 22 March 2016 6 (1), 7, 9 (1) No Violation
D.T. and A.A. v. Canada 2081/2011 15 July 2016 17, 23, 24 Violation
A.B. v. Canada 2387/2014 15 July 2016 17, 2(3), 23(1), 6(1), 7 No Violation
Ch.H.O. v. Canada 2195/2012 03 November 2016 2 (1) (3), 18 (2) Inadmissible
Saxena v. Canada 2118/2011 03 November 2016 9, 13 Violation
Contreras v. Canada 2613/2015 27 March 2017 2(3), 6, 7, 9, 17, 23 Violation
N.D.J.M.D. v. Canada 2487/2014 08 November 2017 6 (1), 7, 9 (1) No Violation
W.K. v. Canada 2292/2013 27 March 2018 6 (1), 7, 9 (1), 17, 18, 27 No Violation
Deepan Budlakoti v. Canada 2264/2013 18 April 2018 2 (3), 3, 4, 9, 12 (4), 14, 17, 23 (1) and 24 (3) Violation

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".