 |
Jurisprudence
CCPR - Canada
List of all final views
| Case Name | Comm Number | Date | Articles | Outcome |
|---|
| Lovelace v. Canada | 24/1977 (R.6/24) | 30 July 1981 | 2, 3, 12, 23, 26 27 | Violation |
| Pinkney v. Canada | 27/1977 (R.7/27) | 29 October 1981 | 10(1, 2), 14(3c, 5), 17(1) | Violation |
| Van Duzen v. Canada | 50/1979 (R.12/50) | 07 April 1982 | 15(1) | No Violation |
| MacIsaac v. Canada | 55/1979 | 14 October 1982 | 15(1) | No Violation |
| Bhinder v. Canada | 208/1986 | 09 November 1989 | 18, 26 | No Violation |
| Lubicon Lake Band v. Canada | 167/1984 | 26 March 1990 | 27, 1 | Violation |
| Marshall et al. v. Canada | 205/1986 | 04 November 1991 | 25(a) | No Violation |
| Ballantyne, Davidson and McIntyre v. Canada | 359/1989 & 385/1989 | 31 March 1993 | 19, 26, 27 | Violation |
| Kindler v. Canada | 470/1991 | 30 July 1993 | 6, 7 | No Violation |
| Ng v. Canada | 469/1991 | 05 November 1993 | 6(1, 2), 7, 10 | Violation |
| Singer v. Canada | 455/1991 | 26 July 1994 | 19(2) | Violation |
| Cox v. Canada | 539/1993 | 31 October 1994 | 6, 7,14, 26 | No Violation |
| Stewart v. Canada | 538/1993 | 01 November 1996 | 12(4), 17, 23 | No Violation |
| Canepa v. Canada | 558/1993 | 03 April 1997 | 7, 12(4), 17 | No Violation |
| Gauthier v. Canada | 633/1995 | 07 April 1999 | 19(2,3) | Violation |
| Waldman v. Canada | 694/1996 | 03 November 1999 | 26 | Violation |
| Ross v. Canada | 736/1997 | 18 October 2000 | 18, 19 | No Violation |
| Judge v. Canada | 829/1998 | 05 August 2003 | 2(3), 6, 6(1, 2) | Violation |
| Ahani v. Canada | 1051/2002 | 29 March 2004 | 7, 9(1, 4), 13 | Violation |
| Howard v. Canada | 879/1999 | 26 July 2005 | 27 | No Violation |
| Obodzinsky v. Canada | 1124/2002 | 19 March 2007 | 7 | No Violation |
| N.T. v. Canada | 1052/2002 | 20 March 2007 | 2, 2(3a),14(1), 17, 23, 24 | Violation |
Information is as of 18 July 2008.
CERD, CCPR, CAT, CEDAW, CMW, Disability Convention and Enforced disappearances Convention have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW and Enforced disappearances Convention complaint mechanisms are not yet in force.
Included in this section are:
- requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
- decisions to deal jointly with cases
- admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
- final views.
The Human Rights Committee (under CCPR), the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (under CERD), the Committee Against Torture (under CAT) and the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (under CEDAW) also formally follow up on final Views where a violation has been found. This information is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".
|
|
