|
|
Jurisprudence
CCPR - Colombia
Complete list of decisions
|
Case Name |
Comm Number |
Date |
Articles |
Outcome |
| de Montejo v. Colombia |
64/1979 (R.15/64) |
24 March 1982 |
14(5) |
Violation |
| de Guerrero v. Colombia |
45/1979 (R.11/45) |
31 March 1982 |
6(1) |
Violation |
| Borda et al. v. Colombia |
46/1979 (R.11/46) |
27 July 1982 |
9 (2,3,4), 14 |
Violation |
| Herrera v. Colombia |
161/1983 |
02 November 1987 |
6, 7, 10(1) |
Violation |
| Arévalo v. Colombia |
181/1984 |
03 November 1989 |
6, 9 |
Violation |
| A.Z. v. Colombia |
244/1987 |
03 November 1989 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Delgado Páez v. Colombia |
195/1985 |
12 July 1990 |
9(1), 18, 19, 25(c), 26 |
Violation |
| E.P. et al. v. Colombia |
318/1988 |
25 July 1990 |
1 |
Inadmissible |
| E.M. v. Colombia |
214/1986 |
21 March 1991 |
|
Admissible |
| O.H.C. v. Colombia |
287/1988 |
01 November 1991 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Fei v. Colombia |
514/1992 |
18 March 1994 |
|
Admissible |
| Fei v. Colombia |
514/1992 |
04 April 1995 |
14(1), 17, 23(4) |
Violation |
| Bautista v. Colombia |
563/1993 |
27 October 1995 |
2(3), 6(1), 7, 9(1), 14(3c) |
Violation |
| Arhuaco v. Colombia |
612/1995 |
14 March 1996 |
|
Admissible |
| Arhuaco v. Colombia |
612/1995 |
29 July 1997 |
2(3), 6(1), 7, 9, 14 |
Violation |
| A.A.G. v. Colombia |
697/1996 |
18 March 1998 |
|
Admissible |
| Rojas García v. Colombia |
687/1996 |
03 April 2001 |
7, 17 |
Violation |
| Jiménez Vaca v. Colombia |
859/1999 |
25 March 2002 |
6(1), 9(1), 12(1,4) |
Violation |
| Rodríguez Orejuela v. Colombia |
848/1999 |
23 July 2002 |
14(1),(3)(d,e) |
Violation |
| Coronel et al. v. Colombia |
778/1997 |
24 October 2002 |
6(1), 7, 9, 17(1) |
Violation |
|
Aponte Guzmán v. Colombia |
697/1996 |
05 July 2004 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Castro v. Colombia |
1103/2002 |
28 October 2005 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Becerra v. Colombia |
1298/2004 |
11 July 2006 |
14 |
Violation |
| Arboleda v. Colombia |
1120/2002 |
25 July 2006 |
|
Inadmissible |
| X v. Colombia |
1361/2005 |
30 March 2007 |
26 |
Violation |
| Gaviria Lucas v. Colombia |
1541/2007
|
27 October 2009 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Guerra de la Espriella v. Colombia |
1623/2007 |
18 March 2010 |
2(3)(a), 14, 14(3) |
Violation |
| Manzano et al. v. Colombia |
1616/2007 |
19 March 2010 |
14(1) |
Inadmissible |
| Bonilla Lerma v. Colombia |
1611/2007 |
26 July 2011 |
14(1) |
Violation |
| R. A. D. B. v. Colombia |
1800/2008 |
31 October 2011 |
|
Inadmissible |
| Bruges v. Colombia |
1641/2007 |
23 March 2012 |
14(5) |
Violation |
| J. B. R. et al. v. Colombia |
1822-1826/2008 |
23 July 2012 |
2(2, 3), 14(1), 22(1), 26 |
Inadmissible |
| D.T.T. v. Colombia |
1904/2009 |
25 March 2013 |
14, 15 |
Inadmissible |
| Serna et al v. Colombia |
2134/2012 |
09 July 2015 |
2 (3), 6 (1), 7, 9, 10, 16, 17, 23 (1) |
Violation |
| C.L.C.D., V.F.C. and A.F.C. v. Colombia |
2399/2014 |
30 March 2016 |
2 (3), 6 (1), 7, 9 (1), 12 (1), 17, 24 |
Inadmissible |
| F. A. H. v. Colombia |
2121/2011 |
28 March 2017 |
2(2)(3), 14(1), 22, 26 |
Inadmissible |
| I.D.M. v. Colombia |
2414/2014 |
25 July 2018 |
2, 3, 9 (1), (4) and (5), 14 (1)–(3) and (5), and 26 |
Violation |
| Andrés Felipe Arias Leiva v. Colombia |
2537/2015 |
27 July 2018 |
10(1), 11, 14(1)(2)(3)(5)(6)(7), 7, 9(1), 9(4), 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 25, 26 |
Violation |
Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.
CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.
Included in this section are:
- requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
- decisions to deal jointly with cases
- admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
- final views.
Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".
|
