|
Jurisprudence
CCPR - Colombia
List of all final views
Case Name |
Comm Number |
Date |
Articles |
Outcome |
de Montejo v. Colombia |
64/1979 (R.15/64) |
24 March 1982 |
14(5) |
Violation |
de Guerrero v. Colombia |
45/1979 (R.11/45) |
31 March 1982 |
6(1) |
Violation |
Borda et al. v. Colombia |
46/1979 (R.11/46) |
27 July 1982 |
9 (2,3,4), 14 |
Violation |
Herrera v. Colombia |
161/1983 |
02 November 1987 |
6, 7, 10(1) |
Violation |
Arévalo v. Colombia |
181/1984 |
03 November 1989 |
6, 9 |
Violation |
Delgado Páez v. Colombia |
195/1985 |
12 July 1990 |
9(1), 18, 19, 25(c), 26 |
Violation |
Fei v. Colombia |
514/1992 |
04 April 1995 |
14(1), 17, 23(4) |
Violation |
Bautista v. Colombia |
563/1993 |
27 October 1995 |
2(3), 6(1), 7, 9(1), 14(3c) |
Violation |
Arhuaco v. Colombia |
612/1995 |
29 July 1997 |
2(3), 6(1), 7, 9, 14 |
Violation |
Rojas García v. Colombia |
687/1996 |
03 April 2001 |
7, 17 |
Violation |
Jiménez Vaca v. Colombia |
859/1999 |
25 March 2002 |
6(1), 9(1), 12(1,4) |
Violation |
Rodríguez Orejuela v. Colombia |
848/1999 |
23 July 2002 |
14(1),(3)(d,e) |
Violation |
Coronel et al. v. Colombia |
778/1997 |
24 October 2002 |
6(1), 7, 9, 17(1) |
Violation |
Becerra v. Colombia |
1298/2004 |
11 July 2006 |
14 |
Violation |
X v. Colombia |
1361/2005 |
30 March 2007 |
26 |
Violation |
Guerra de la Espriella v. Colombia |
1623/2007 |
18 March 2010 |
2(3)(a), 14, 14(3) |
Violation |
Bonilla Lerma v. Colombia |
1611/2007 |
26 July 2011 |
14(1) |
Violation |
Bruges v. Colombia |
1641/2007 |
23 March 2012 |
14(5) |
Violation |
Serna et al v. Colombia |
2134/2012 |
09 July 2015 |
2 (3), 6 (1), 7, 9, 10, 16, 17, 23 (1) |
Violation |
I.D.M. v. Colombia |
2414/2014 |
25 July 2018 |
2, 3, 9 (1), (4) and (5), 14 (1)–(3) and (5), and 26 |
Violation |
Andrés Felipe Arias Leiva v. Colombia |
2537/2015 |
27 July 2018 |
10(1), 11, 14(1)(2)(3)(5)(6)(7), 7, 9(1), 9(4), 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 25, 26 |
Violation |
Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.
CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.
Included in this section are:
- requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
- decisions to deal jointly with cases
- admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
- final views.
Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".
|