Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - Colombia

List of all final views

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
de Montejo v. Colombia 64/1979 (R.15/64) 24 March 1982 14(5) Violation
de Guerrero v. Colombia 45/1979 (R.11/45) 31 March 1982 6(1) Violation
Borda et al. v. Colombia 46/1979 (R.11/46) 27 July 1982 9 (2,3,4), 14 Violation
Herrera v. Colombia 161/1983 02 November 1987 6, 7, 10(1) Violation
Arévalo v. Colombia 181/1984 03 November 1989 6, 9 Violation
Delgado Páez v. Colombia 195/1985 12 July 1990 9(1), 18, 19, 25(c), 26 Violation
Fei v. Colombia 514/1992 04 April 1995 14(1), 17, 23(4) Violation
Bautista v. Colombia 563/1993 27 October 1995 2(3), 6(1), 7, 9(1), 14(3c) Violation
Arhuaco v. Colombia 612/1995 29 July 1997 2(3), 6(1), 7, 9, 14 Violation
Rojas García v. Colombia 687/1996 03 April 2001 7, 17 Violation
Jiménez Vaca v. Colombia 859/1999 25 March 2002 6(1), 9(1), 12(1,4) Violation
Rodríguez Orejuela v. Colombia 848/1999 23 July 2002 14(1),(3)(d,e) Violation
Coronel et al. v. Colombia 778/1997 24 October 2002 6(1), 7, 9, 17(1) Violation
Becerra v. Colombia 1298/2004 11 July 2006 14 Violation
X v. Colombia 1361/2005 30 March 2007 26 Violation
Guerra de la Espriella v. Colombia 1623/2007 18 March 2010 2(3)(a), 14, 14(3) Violation
Bonilla Lerma v. Colombia 1611/2007 26 July 2011 14(1) Violation
Bruges v. Colombia 1641/2007 23 March 2012 14(5) Violation
Serna et al v. Colombia 2134/2012 09 July 2015 2 (3), 6 (1), 7, 9, 10, 16, 17, 23 (1) Violation
I.D.M. v. Colombia 2414/2014 25 July 2018 2, 3, 9 (1), (4) and (5), 14 (1)–(3) and (5), and 26 Violation
Andrés Felipe Arias Leiva v. Colombia 2537/2015 27 July 2018 10(1), 11, 14(1)(2)(3)(5)(6)(7), 7, 9(1), 9(4), 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 25, 26 Violation

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".