Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - Australia

List of all final views

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
Toonen v. Australia 488/1992 30 March 1994 2(1), 17(1), 26 Violation
A. v. Australia 560/1993 03 April 1997 9(1, 4, 5), 14(1) Violation
A.R.J. v. Australia 692/1996 28 July 1997 6(1,2), 7, 14(1, 3) No Violation
G.T. v. Australia 706/1996 04 November 1997 2(1), 6, 7, 9 No Violation
Winata v. Australia 930/2000 26 July 2001 17, 23(1), 24(1) Violation
Rogerson v. Australia 802/1998 03 April 2002 14 (3a,b,c,g), 15(1) Violation
C. v. Australia 900/1999 28 October 2002 7,9(1),(4) Violation
Young v. Australia 941/2000 06 August 2003 26 Violation
Baban et al. v. Australia 1014/2001 06 August 2003 9(1, 4), 19(3) Violation
Cabal and Pasini v. Australia 1020/2001 07 August 2003 7, 10(1, 2a) Violation
Bakhtiyari v. Australia 1069/2002 29 October 2003 7, 9(1, 4), 17(1), 23(1), 24(1) Violation
Nicholas v. Australia 1080/2002 19 March 2004 15(1) No Violation
Lovell v. Australia 920/2000 24 March 2004 14(5), 19(2, 3) No Violation
Madafferi v. Australia 1011/2001 26 July 2004 7, 9, 9(1), 10(1), 12(4), 17, 17(1), 23, 24(1) Violation
Faure v. Australia 1036/2001 31 October 2005 2(3), 8 Violation
Brough v. Australia 1184/2003 17 March 2006 7, 10, 10(1, 2b, 3), 24(1) Violation
D. and E. v. Australia 1050/2002 11 July 2006 9(1) Violation
Coleman v. Australia 1157/2003 17 July 2006 19(2, 3) Violation
Dranichnikov v. Australia 1291/2004 20 October 2006 14(1) No Violation
Shafiq v. Australia 1324/2004 31 October 2006 9, 9(1, 4) Violation
Shams et al. v. Australia 1255, 1256, 1259,1260, 1266, 1268, 1270,1288/2004 20 July 2007 2(3), 9(1,4) Violation
Dudko v. Australia 1347/2005 23 July 2007 14(1) Violation
Kwok v. Australia 1442/2005 23 October 2009 6, 7, 9(1) Violation
Fardon v. Australia 1629/2007 18 March 2010 9(1), 15(1) Violation
Tillman v. Australia 1635/2007 18 March 2010 2(3)(a), 9(1), 14(7) Violation
Nystrom et. al v. Australia 1557/2007 18 July 2011 9(1), 12(4), 17, 23(1) Violation
Lin v. Australia 1957/2010 21 March 2013 6, 7, 9, 17 No Violation
M.M.M. et al. v. Australia 2136/2012 25 July 2013 7, 10 (1), 9 (1,2,4) Violation
F.K.A.G. v. Australia 2094/2011 26 July 2013 7, 9, 17, 24 Violation
Horvath v. Australia 1885/2009 27 March 2014 2, 7, 9, 17 Violation
Z. v. Australia 2049/2011 18 July 2014 7, 18, 19 Violation
B.L. v. Australia 2053/2011 16 October 2014 6, 7, 18 No Violation
Griffiths v. Australia 1973/2010 21 October 2014 2, 9, 13, 14 Violation
Blessington and Elliot v. Australia 1968/2010 22 October 2014 7, 10, 15, 24 Violation
Leghaei v. Australia 1937/2010 26 March 2015 2, 13, 17, 23, 24, 26 Violation
M.G.C. v. Australia 1875/2009 26 March 2015 9, 13, 14, 17, 23, 24 Violation
Hicks v. Australia 2005/2010 05 November 2015 2, 7, 9, 10, 12, 14, 15, 17, 19, 22 Violation
Z v. Australia 2279/2013 05 November 2015 14, 17, 23, 24, 26 Violation
F.J. et al. v. Australia 2233/2013 22 March 2016 7, 9 (1), (2), (4), 10 (1) Violation
Nasir v. Australia 2229/2012 29 March 2016 9 (1), (3), (4), 10 (1), 14 (1), (3) (c), (5), 17 (1), 23 (1) Violation
G. v. Australia 2172/2012 17 March 2017 17, 2(1), 2(3), 26 Violation
Alger v. Australia 2237/2013 13 July 2017 17, 18, 19, 2, 25, 26, 50 Violation

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".