|
|
Jurisprudence
CEDAW
List of all final views
|
Case Name |
Comm Number |
Date |
Articles |
Outcome |
| A. T. v. Hungary |
2/2003 |
26 January 2005 |
2(a,b,e), 5(a), 16 |
Violation |
| Szijjarto v. Hungary |
4/2004 |
14 August 2006 |
10(h), 12, 16(1e) |
Violation |
| Nguyen v. The Netherlands |
3/2004 |
14 August 2006 |
11(2, 2b) |
No Violation |
| Goekce v. Austria |
5/2005 |
06 August 2007 |
1, 2(a,c-f), 3 |
Violation |
| Yildirim v. Austria |
6/2005 |
06 August 2007 |
1, 2(a,c-f), 3 |
Violation |
| Vertido v. The Philippines |
18/2008 |
16 July 2010 |
1, 2 (c,f), 5(a) |
Violation |
| Teixeira v. Brazil |
17/2008 |
25 July 2011 |
1, 2(c, e), 12(1, 2) |
Violation |
| V. K. v. Bulgaria |
20/2008 |
25 July 2011 |
1, 2(c, d, e,f), 5(a), 16 (1) |
Violation |
| Abramova v. Belarus |
23/2009 |
25 July 2011 |
1, 2(a, b, d, e, f), 3, 5(a) |
Violation |
| L. C. v. Peru |
22/2009 |
17 October 2011 |
1, 2(c, f), 3, 5, 12 |
Violation |
| R. K. B. v. Turkey |
28/2010 |
24 February 2012 |
1, 2 (a, c), 5(a), 11 (1 a,d) |
Violation |
| Kell v. Canada |
19/2008 |
28 February 2012 |
1, 2 (d, e), 16 (1h) |
Violation |
| S.V.P. v. Bulgaria |
31/2011 |
12 October 2012 |
1, 2(a, b, c, e, f, g), 3, 5(a, b), 12, 15(1) |
Violation |
| De Blok et al v. Netherlands |
36/2012 |
17 February 2014 |
11 (2)(b) |
Violation |
| R.P.B. v. Philippines |
34/2011 |
21 February 2014 |
1, 2(c)(d)(f) |
Violation |
| Carreno v. Spain |
47/2012 |
16 July 2014 |
1, 2(a-f), 5(a), 16(1)(d) |
Violation |
| E.S. and S.C. v. Tanzania |
48/2013 |
02 March 2015 |
2(c), 2(f), 5(a), 15, 16 |
Violation |
| X. & Y. v. Georgia |
24/2009 |
13 July 2015 |
1, 2(a-f), 5(a) |
Violation |
| Belousova v. Kazakhstan |
45/2012 |
13 July 2015 |
2(e), 5(a), 11, 14 |
Violation |
| A. v. Denmark |
53/2013 |
19 November 2015 |
2 (c),(d) |
Violation |
| M.W. v. Denmark |
46/2012 |
22 February 2016 |
1, 16 (1), 2, 5 (a)(b) |
Violation |
| Medvedeva v. Russian Federation |
60/2013 |
25 February 2016 |
2 (c), (d), (e), (f), 11 (1) (b), (c), (f) |
Violation |
| N.Q. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland |
62/2013 |
25 February 2016 |
1, 2 (c), (d),(e), 3, 5, 16 |
No Violation |
| F.F.M. v. Denmark |
070/2014 |
21 July 2017 |
1, 16, 2, 3, 5 |
No Violation |
| A.M. v. Denmark |
077/2014 |
21 July 2017 |
1, 2, 5, 16 |
No Violation |
| N.M. v. Denmark |
078/2014 |
21 July 2017 |
3, 5, 7 |
No Violation |
| Reyna Trujillo Reyes and Pedro Arguello Morales v. Mexico |
075/2014 |
21 July 2017 |
1, 2, 5, 15 |
Violation |
| O.G. v. Russian Federation |
091/2015 |
06 November 2017 |
1, 2 (b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g), 3, 5 (a) |
Violation |
| X. v. Timor-Leste |
088/2015 |
26 February 2018 |
15, 16, 2(c),(d),(f) |
Violation |
| J.I. v. Finland |
103/2016 |
05 March 2018 |
1, 15, 16(1)(d), 16(1)(e), 16(1)(f), 2(a),(c), (d), (f) |
Violation |
Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.
CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.
Included in this section are:
- requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
- decisions to deal jointly with cases
- admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
- final views.
Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".
|
