Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CERD

List of all admissibility decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Outcome
Diop v. France 2/1989 22 August 1990 Admissible
Narrainen v. Norway 3/1991 16 March 1993 Admissible
C.P. and M.P. v. Denmark 5/1994 15 March 1995 Inadmissible
Barbaro v. Australia 7/1995 14 August 1997 Inadmissible
Z.U.B.S. v. Australia 6/1995 19 August 1997 Admissible
B.M.S. v. Australia 8/1996 19 August 1997 Admissible
D. S. v. Sweden 9/1997 17 August 1998 Inadmissible
Barbaro v. Australia 12/1998 08 August 2000 Inadmissible
F. A. v. Norway 18/2000 21 March 2001 Inadmissible
D. S. v. Sweden 14/1998 10 August 2001 Inadmissible
D. S. v. Sweden 21/2001 10 August 2001 Inadmissible
Mostafa v. Denmark 19/2000 10 August 2001 Inadmissible
K.R.C. v. Denmark 23/2002 13 August 2002 Inadmissible
P.O.E.M. and F.A.S.M. v. Denmark 22/2002 19 March 2003 Inadmissible
Sadic v. Denmark 25/2002 21 March 2003 Inadmissible
Regerat et al. v. France 24/2002 21 March 2003 Inadmissible
Documentary and Advisory Centre on Racial Discrimination v. Denmark 28/2003 19 August 2003 Inadmissible
P.S.N. v. Denmark 36/2006 08 August 2007 Inadmissible
A.W.R.A.P. v. Denmark 37/2006 08 August 2007 Inadmissible
Hermansen et al. v. Denmark 44/2009 13 August 2010 Inadmissible
A. S. v. Russian Federation 45/2009 26 August 2011 Inadmissible
M. v. Russian Federation 55/2014 07 August 2015 Inadmissible

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".