The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Case Name	Comm Number	Date	Outcome
Diop v. France	2/1989	22 August 1990	Admissible
Narrainen v. Norway	3/1991	16 March 1993	Admissible
C.P. and M.P. v. Denmark	5/1994	15 March 1995	Inadmissible
Barbaro v. Australia	7/1995	14 August 1997	Inadmissible
Z.U.B.S. v. Australia	6/1995	19 August 1997	Admissible
B.M.S. v. Australia	8/1996	19 August 1997	Admissible
D. S. v. Sweden	9/1997	17 August 1998	Inadmissible
Barbaro v. Australia	12/1998	08 August 2000	Inadmissible
F. A. v. Norway	18/2000	21 March 2001	Inadmissible
D. S. v. Sweden	14/1998	10 August 2001	Inadmissible
D. S. v. Sweden	21/2001	10 August 2001	Inadmissible
Mostafa v. Denmark	19/2000	10 August 2001	Inadmissible
K.R.C. v. Denmark	23/2002	13 August 2002	Inadmissible
P.O.E.M. and F.A.S.M. v. Denmark	22/2002	19 March 2003	Inadmissible
Sadic v. Denmark	25/2002	21 March 2003	Inadmissible
Regerat et al. v. France	24/2002	21 March 2003	Inadmissible
Documentary and Advisory Centre on Racial Discrimination v. Denmark	28/2003	19 August 2003	Inadmissible
P.S.N. v. Denmark	36/2006	08 August 2007	Inadmissible
A.W.R.A.P. v. Denmark	37/2006	08 August 2007	Inadmissible

Information is as of 6 June 2008.

CERD, CCPR, CAT, CEDAW, CMW, Disability Convention and Enforced disappearances Convention have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW and Enforced disappearances Convention complaint mechanisms are not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
decisions to deal jointly with cases
admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
final views.

The Human Rights Committee (under CCPR), the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (under CERD), the Committee Against Torture (under CAT) and the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (under CEDAW) also formally follow up on final Views where a violation has been found. This information is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".