|
|
Jurisprudence
CERD
List of all final views
|
Case Name |
Comm Number |
Date |
Articles |
Outcome |
| Yilmaz-Dogan v. The Netherlands |
1/1984 |
10 August 1988 |
4, 5(e(i)), 6 |
Violation |
| Diop v. France |
2/1989 |
18 March 1991 |
1(1,2), 5(e) |
No Violation |
| L. K. v. The Netherlands |
4/1991 |
16 March 1993 |
4(a), 6 |
Violation |
| Habassi v. Denmark |
10/1997 |
17 March 1999 |
2(1d), 6 |
Violation |
| Ahmad v. Denmark |
16/1999 |
13 March 2000 |
2(1d), 6 |
Violation |
| B.J. v. Denmark |
17/1999 |
17 March 2000 |
6 |
No Violation |
| Koptova v. Slovakia |
13/1998 |
08 August 2000 |
5(d(i)) |
Violation |
| E.I.F. v. The Netherlands |
15/1999 |
21 March 2001 |
2, 5, 6, 7 |
No Violation |
| Lacko v. Slovakia |
11/1998 |
09 August 2001 |
2, 3, 4, 5, 6 |
No Violation |
| M.B. v. Denmark |
20/2000 |
13 March 2002 |
2 (1d) |
No Violation |
| Hagan v. Australia |
26/2002 |
20 March 2003 |
2(1c), 5, 6, 7 |
Violation |
| Kamal Quereshi v. Denmark |
27/2002 |
19 August 2003 |
4(b), 6 |
No Violation |
| L. R. et al. v. Slovakia |
31/2003 |
07 March 2005 |
1, 2(1a), 5(d)(iii), 6 |
Violation |
| Sefic v. Denmark |
32/2003 |
07 March 2005 |
2(1d), 5, 6 |
No Violation |
| Quereshi v. Denmark |
33/2003 |
09 March 2005 |
2(1d), 4, 6 |
No Violation |
| The Jewish community of Oslo et al. v. Norway |
30/2003 |
15 August 2005 |
4, 5, 6 |
Violation |
| Gelle v. Denmark |
34/2004 |
06 March 2006 |
2(1d), 4, 6 |
Violation |
| Durmic v. Serbia and Montenegro |
29/2003 |
06 March 2006 |
5(f), 6 |
Violation |
| Er v. Denmark |
40/2007 |
08 August 2007 |
2(1d), 5(ev), 6 |
Violation |
| Zentralrat Deutscher Sinti und Roma et al. v. Germany |
38/2006 |
22 February 2008 |
4(a) , 6 |
No Violation |
| D.F. v. Australia |
39/2006 |
22 February 2008 |
5(e)(iv), 2(1)(a) |
No Violation |
| D.R. v. Australia |
42/2008 |
14 August 2009 |
2(1)(a), 5(d)(iii), 5(e)(iv), 5(e)(v) |
No Violation |
| Adan v. Denmark |
43/2008 |
13 August 2010 |
2(1d), 4, 6 |
Violation |
| Dawas and Shava v. Denmark |
46/2009 |
06 March 2012 |
2 (1d), 6 |
Violation |
| TBB v. Germany |
48/2010 |
26 February 2013 |
4 |
Violation |
| A.M.M. v. Switzerland |
50/2012 |
18 February 2014 |
1(1,2,3,4), 2(2), 4(c), 5(a,b,d), 6, 7 |
No Violation |
| V.S. v. Slovakia |
56/2014 |
04 December 2014 |
2(1)(a,c,d,e), 2(2), 5(e)(1), 6 |
Violation |
| Laurent Gabre Gabaroum v. France |
052/2012 |
10 May 2016 |
2(6) |
Violation |
| Benon Pjetri v. Switzerland |
053/2013 |
05 December 2016 |
2(1)(a), 2(1)(c), 5(a), 5(d)(iii), 6 |
No Violation |
Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.
CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.
Included in this section are:
- requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
- decisions to deal jointly with cases
- admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
- final views.
Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".
|
