Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CESCR

List of all final views

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
Rodriguez v. Spain 01/2013 06 November 2013 2(2), 9 No Violation
I.D.G. v. Spain 02/2014 17 June 2015 2(1), 11(1) Violation
Ben Djazia et al v. Spain 005/2015 20 June 2017 11 (1) Violation
Trujillo Calero v. Ecuador 010/2015 26 March 2018 2 (2), 3, 9 Violation

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".