Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CRC

Complete list of decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
Abdul-Hamid Aziz v. Spain 1/2014 04 June 2015 3, 8, 18, 20, 27, 29 Inadmissible
A.A.A. v. Spain 2/2015 30 September 2016 3, 13, 14, 16, 39 Inadmissible
A.B.H and M.B.H. v. Costa Rica 5/2016 17 January 2017 8 Inadmissible
M.E.B. v. Spain 9/2017 01 February 2017 3 Admissable (discontinued)
I.A.M. v. Denmark 003/2016 25 January 2018 1, 2, 3, 19 Violation
S.C.S. v. France 010/2017 25 January 2018 2, 3, 4, 27 (3), 28, 37 (a) Inadmissible
R.L. v. Spain 018/2017 25 January 2018 N/A Admissable (discontinued)
Z.Y. and J.Y. v. Denmark 007/2016 31 May 2018 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 19 Inadmissible
Y.M. v. Spain 008/2016 31 May 2018 3, 8, 12, 18 (2), 20, 27, 29 Inadmissible
K.A.B. v. Germany 035/2017 31 May 2018 N/A Admissable (discontinued)
M.B. v. Spain 039/2017 31 May 2018 N/A Admissable (discontinued)

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".