Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CRPD

List of all admissibility decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Outcome
McAlpine v. U.K. 6/2011 28 September 2012 Inadmissible
S.C. v. Brazil 10/2013 14 October 2014 Inadmissible
A.M. v. Australia 12/2013 27 March 2015 Inadmissible
D.R. v. Australia 14/2013 24 March 2017 Inadmissible
L.M.L. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 27/2015 24 March 2017 Inadmissible
D.L v. Sweden 31/2015 24 March 2017 Inadmissible
D.R. v. Australia 14/2013 24 March 2017 Inadmissible
L.M.L v. United Kingdom 27/2015 24 March 2017 Inadmissible
O.O.J. v. Sweden 28/2015 18 August 2017 Inadmissible

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".