WPC  qI`X]-fI0D4mw-־[p5B#b ,!5ӊvU{Ň/%pcIO@$+qV@dWR:N!.  s!W]G^L#q+\(A)֛>)VQԅh{ $#V%qܾz%k%4 Ɓ|/`$pS_)`-ۼH|TѮ%7y\!ufhMa:V39uOa_r BS_PWLx}O& 9@|/RuE3|iEU\hHvUF~HIV -fd<"@M'ѐL0t2O TJǻ/N,(:? Υbh, ?REӦSTSn<ԍ%@sU>l 0v 0<+ 0Yg 0_ 0i 0N 0( D+G AMr  0 # UNF % M ( N ^ w 4  m \  `&Times New Roman' C. E. v. Canada, Communication No. 13/1977 (25 August 1977), U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/1 at 16 (4. CCPR/C/OP/1 at 16 ("Angie Dituri"0Angie Dituri .   6F , 4Heading 3 S p^S   XXX p^S<:Default Para64Hyperlink    <:FollowedHype    < :Normal (Web) S =jS =jSӁ Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5(20D$ !..      X-XXXX-XXX-  ($'dxd A<< c#|x($..      X/XXXX/XXX/HP LaserJet 4000 Series PS0(hH  Z6Times New Roman RegularX<) .):i+00U !..      X-XXXX-XXX-  _ HUMANRIGHTSCOMMITTEE  C.E.v.Canada | CommunicationNo.13/1977 H 25August1977  d ADMISSIBILITY     Submittedby:C.E.on20June1977 x  Allegedvictim:Theauthor D  Stateparty:Canada ` Dateofdecisiononinadmissibility:25August1977(secondsession) ,   DecisiononAdmissibility   Thefactsofthecaseareasfollows: @   Theauthorofthiscommunication,dated20June1977,isa51yearold,unemployed  \ CanadiancitizenresidinginSurrey,BritishColumbia,marriedandfatherofsixchildren. B AlthoughnotexplicitlyaddressedtotheHumanRightsCommittee,thecommunication  appearstobesubmittedforconsiderationbytheCommitteeundertheOptionalProtocolto  theInternationalCovenantonCivilandPoliticalRights.   Theauthorstatesthathehasformanyyearsbeensubjectedtodiscriminationbythe V"! Workman'sCompensationBoard,Canada,inasmuchasduecompensationandmedicalcare <#" havebeendeniedhiminconnectionwithfivesuccessiveworkrelatedaccidentsin1964, "$r# 1970and1971,andthatthisdiscriminationhasbroughtgreathardshipstohimselfandhis %X $ family. %>!% Specifically,thecommunicationdealsonlywiththelastaccidentwhichhappenedwhilethe ' #' authorwasworkinginaschoolworkshop.Heclaimsthathewasdeniedthestudents' (#( accidentinsurancewithmedicalcoverage.Itappearsthattheauthorinitiatedacourtcasein )$) connectionwiththisaccident,claimingdamagesforinjuriessufferedinafallfromafaulty l*%* ladder.Hemaintainsthathewasdenieddueprocessbyahandpickedjudgeandthathis R+&+ effortstoappealthecourtdecisionhavebeeninvain,becauseofhislackoffinancialmeans 8,', andbecausetheLegalAidSocietyhasrefusedhimanyassistance. -n(- ЇTheauthordoesnotspecifywhichprovisionoftheInternationalCovenantonCiviland  PoliticalRightshasallegedlybeenviolated.  Themaincommunicationandtheenclosuresrevealthattheauthorbroughtacourtcase b againsttheBoardofSchoolTrusteesofSchoolDistrictNo.39,Vancouver,etal.,claiming H damagesforinjurysufferedinafallfromaladderinFebruary1971,whileworkingina . ~ schoolworkshop.HisclaimwasdismissedbytheSupremeCourtofBritishColumbiaon  d 29May1975onthegroundthattheaccidentwastheauthor'sownresponsibility.Anotice  J ofappealwasissuedonbehalfoftheauthoron18August1975.Thereisnoinformation  0 concerningfurtherdevelopmentsofthecourtcase,exceptanindicationbytheauthorthat    hedoesnothavethefinancialmeanstopursuethematterbeforethecourtsandthathehas    beendeniedlegalaidbytheLegalAidSocietyofBritishColumbia,whichtheauthor   describesasadenialoftherightofappeal. x  Beforeconsideringanyclaimscontainedinacommunication,theHumanRightsCommittee D  shall,inaccordancewithrule87ofitsprovisionalrulesofprocedure,decidewhetherornot *z  itisadmissibleundertheOptionalProtocoltotheCovenant. ` TheHumanRightsCommitteeconsiders: , Thatasfarasanyquestionofadenialofjusticemightberaisedbythecommunication,such  claimwouldrelatetoeventspriorto19August1976,thedateofentryintoforceofthe  CovenantandtheProtocolforCanada;andThatasfarastheremainingclaimspresentedin t thecommunicationareconcerned,theylikewiserelatetosucheventsandmoreoverdonot Z concernanyofthecivilandpoliticalrightsreferredtointheCovenant. @ TheCommitteetherefore,inaccordancewitharticle3oftheProtocol,decides:  \ Thecommunicationisinadmissible. ( 7