WPC  =j$4{ =U'w@ֹccɧ 75ƞ>Ѐ,n`8 uvV. 0ܠiaF]ZR8ZlyN8^@|ngs#\rs~Icšb7ND-okL1L [H]qrRUἉB|S潹`V2|S7b G4Z;yuK?29gYMYCXHijܶ|Vj9^"x<ئ` d#0G ̯ؕR$.(e,b!^6s} 8yƯ8[-ja@+ Z~&u>i YEb~PTk1qk[!̡F&0Cu>ky uC0{ k<9˕oNrrH鄐(R/:-!cU>l 0v 0<+ 0Yg 0_ 0i 0N 0( D+G AMr  0 # UNF % M ( N ^ w 4  m \  `&Times New Roman' K. B. v. Norway, Communication No. 53/1979 (14 August 1979), U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/1 at 24 (4. CCPR/C/OP/1 at 24 ("Angie Dituri"0Angie Dituri .   6F , 4Heading 3 S p^S   XXX p^S<:Default Para64Hyperlink    <:FollowedHype    < :Normal (Web) S =jS =jSӁ Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5(2"C$ d!..      X1XXXX1XXX1  ($'dxd A<< c#|x(d$..      X*XXXX*XXX*HP LaserJet 4000 Series PS0(hH  Z6Times New Roman RegularX{) Kk):i+00U d!..      X1XXXX1XXX1  _ HUMANRIGHTSCOMMITTEE  K.B.v.Norway | CommunicationNo.53/1979 H 14August1979  d ADMISSIBILITY     Submittedby:K.B.on16June1979 x  Allegedvictim.'Theauthor D  Stateparty:Norway ` Dateofdecisiononinadmissibility:14August1979(seventhsession) ,    DecisiononAdmissibility     Theauthorofthecommunication,dated16June1979,isaNorwegiancitizenlivingin @ Norway,whoinheritedafiatinOsloin1964,closetoherhome.Shewasseparatedfromher &v husbandin1975after26yearsofmarriage.InDecember1976,hesoughtbyproceedings  \ beforetheOsloTownCourttoobtaintheright,againsttheauthor'swill,tomoveintoher B fiat,asatenant.Thefiathadbeenrentedtounrelatedpersonssinceitcameintothe ( ownershipoftheauthor.InajudgementdeliveredinDecember1977,theOsloTownCourt  rejectedhisclaim.  ThemarriagewasdissolvedbydivorceinFebruary1978,andbywayofanadministrative p!  settlementbythespecialcourtformatrimonialestates,thefiatinheritedbytheauthorwas V"! assignedtoherasherproperty. <#" TheexhusbandappealedagainstthejudgmentoftheOsloTownCourttotheCourtof %X $ Appeals,whichinNovember1978grantedhimtherighttomoveintothefiatand,forthat %>!% purpose,todealdirectlywiththepresenttenants.Theauthor'sapplicationtoappealtothe &$"& SupremeCourtwasrejectedbytheJudicialSelectAppealsCommitteeon20March1979. ' #' ApetitionforareviewofthedecisionoftheJudicialSelectAppealsCommitteewas (#( dismissed. )$) TheauthorallegesthatthedecisionoftheCourtofAppeals,havingtheeffectofdepriving R+&+ heroftherighttodisposeofherproperty,constitutesabreachofarticles2(1),3and26of 8,', theInternationalCovenantonCivilandPoliticalRights. -n(- ЇTheHumanRightsCommitteeobservesthattherighttodisposeofproperty,assuch,isnot  protectedbyanyprovisionoftheInternationalCovenantonCivilandPoliticalRights.  Athoroughexaminationofthecommunicationhasnotrevealedanyfactsinsubstantiation b oftheauthor'sclaimthatsheisavictimofabreachbytheStatepartyofarticles2(1),3or H 26oftheCovenantorofanyotherrightsprotectedbytheCovenant. . ~ TheHumanRightsCommitteethereforedecides:Thecommunicationis_inadmissible._____