WPC F/X#$jT -oY)όrmh}mg|GV-!#/Kf 4ɡo'A+[ nIYc 0QC >kckA8֟rv7\d]o ɺO=D@NursTbQ ^Ko0uOcyƫC MN> ɐfjJ> z4_%QJ]B{t\gN5ONZOh{ZG~.]AWvSneI߬C&znJob)clJépe6`1+ s]aY\s4#UN %  0:^ KwW4[o~ m$ 1 72B 1ut 72 0cN~HP LaserJet 6P/6MP - Standard0&d9 Z6Times New Roman RegularX($UKUS.,r(, tQ+0Gd:3|xU Refik Gul(5hCEKQW]cioAutoList11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1. 1.3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)i)(;3$2#  0  .3  0  !UKUS.,  _ COMMITTEEAGAINSTTORTURE  R.E.G.v.Turkey  CommunicationNo.4/1990 p 29April1991 P  CAT/C/6/D/4/1990* 0  ADMISSIBILITY  P  Submittedby:Mr.R.E.G.(namedeleted)(representedbycounsel)   Allegedvictim:Theauthor  Statepartyconcerned:Turkey  Dateofcommunication:20August1990 p Documentationreference:PriorDecisionsnone P Dateofpresentdecision:29April1991 0   TheCommitteeagainstTorture,establishedunderarticle17oftheConventionagainstTortureand P otherCruel,InhumanorDegradingTreatmentorPunishment, @ Meetingon29April1991,   Adoptsthefollowing: "     Decisiononadmissibility  % # 6 (5h831.TheauthorofthecommunicationisaTurkishcitizenofKurdishethnicorigin,currentlyresiding P(#& inFrance,whereheisapplyingforpoliticalasylum.Heclaimstobeavictimoftortureallegedly @)$' perpetratedbyTurkishpoliceinMay1989.Turkeymadethedeclarationprovidedforinarticle22 0*%( oftheConventionon2August1988.  +p&) 2.Beforeconsideringanyclaimscontainedinacommunication,theCommitteeagainstTorture -P(+ mustdecidewhetherornotitisadmissibleunderarticle22oftheConvention. -@), Ї3.Article22,paragraph5(b),oftheConventionprecludestheCommitteefromconsideringany  communicationfromanindividual,unlessithasascertainedthattheindividualhasexhaustedall  availabledomesticremedies;thisruledoesnotapplyifitisestablishedthattheapplicationof  domesticremedieshasbeenorwouldbeunreasonablyprolongedorwouldbeunlikelytobring  effectiverelief.Theauthorhasinvokedthisexception,generallyclaimingthatremediesinTurkey p wouldnotbeeffective;thushehasnotfiledanycomplaintwiththecompetentauthoritiesinTurkey `  withaviewtoinitiatinganinvestigationunderTurkishlawintohisallegationthathewassubjected P  totorture.However,onthebasisoftheinformationbeforeit,theCommitteecannotconcludethat @  suchacomplaintwouldbeaprioriineffectiveand,assuch,wouldnotprovidearemedythatthe 0  authorneedexhaustbeforeaddressingacommunicationtotheCommittee.Accordingly,the  p  Committeefindsthattherequirementsofarticle22,paragraph5(b),oftheConventionhavenot `  beenmet. P  4.TheCommitteethereforedecides; 0  0  (a)Thatthecommunicationisinadmissible;(#(# 0  (b)Thatthisdecisionmaybereviewedunderrule109oftheCommitteesrulesofprocedure  uponreceiptofawrittenrequestbyoronbehalfoftheauthorcontaininginformationtothe  effectthatthereasonsforinadmissibilitynolongerapply;(#(# 0  (c)Thatthisdecisionshallbecommunicatedtotheauthorand,forinformation,totheState ` party.P(#(# [DoneinEnglish,French,RussianandSpanish,theEnglishtextbeingtheoriginalversion] 0 _______ P */MadepublicbydecisionoftheCommitteeagainstTorture @ */Allpersonshandlingthisdocumentarerequestedtorespectandobserveitsconfidentialnature