WPC )(9hQ'y ׋9l2w629ߣփ7%@`W"oԩӣD)69eY J+jTzug>.% 7Nw3BSiDYzq~66M%Q[Lm]֤`c4ӾҙhȽ(f끫N\a҄M'9FGu8!pm[Dl"%[ w;Y8`D Ƭ&wyqj*wϓf4i$lثl|VenI8þ1*BrEUppŃ?! k0gnF ajSDbFSNmR9k.U>l 0v 0<+ 0Yg 0_ 0i 0N 0( D+G AMr  0 # UNF % M ( N ^ w 4  m \  `&Times New Roman' J. J. v. Denmark, Communication No. 60/1979 (26 March 1980), U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/1 at 26 (4. CCPR/C/OP/1 at 26 ("Angie Dituri"0Angie Dituri .   6F , 4Heading 3 S p^S   XXX p^S<:Default Para64Hyperlink    <:FollowedHype    < :Normal (Web) S =jS =jSӁ Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5(2@$ !..      X3OXXXX3OXXX3O  ($'dxd A<< c#|x($..      X.'XXXX.'XXX.'HP LaserJet 4000 Series PS0(hH  Z6Times New Roman RegularXD) <):i+00U !..      X3OXXXX3OXXX3O  _ HUMANRIGHTSCOMMITTEE  J.J.v._Denmar_ | CommunicationNo.60/1979 H 26March1980  d ADMISSIBILITY     Submittedby:J.J.on14July1979 x  Allegedvictim:Theauthor D  Stateparty:Denmark ` Dateofdecisiononinadmissibility:26March1980(ninthsession) ,   DecisiononAdmissibility     Theauthorofthecommunication(dated14July1979)isaDanishcitizenresidingin @ Denmark.Hestatesthaton1November1970hecontractedtobuyanelevenyearoldcar &v for_DKr_Ԁ500.Hesubsequentlysoughttoinvalidatethepurchaseandappliedforleavetofile  \ acivilsuitfleeofcosts.HisapplicationwasrefusedbythedistrictauthorityandtheMinistry B ofJusticealsorejectedanapplicationtoreversethedecisionofthedistrictauthority.Hethen ( submittedthemattertotheParliamentaryOmbudsman.Thelatterfoundnocircumstances  meritingcensureofthedecisionsoftheDanishauthoritiesconcernedinthecase.The  author'scomplaintisdirectedagainsttherefusaloftheOmbudsmantocensurethedecision   oftheMinistryofJustice. p!  TheHumanRightsCommittee,aftercarefulexaminationofthecommunication,isofthe <#" opinionthatthecommunicationdoesnotrevealanyevidenceofviolationoftheCovenant "$r# bytheDanishauthorities. %X $ TheHumanRightsCommitteethereforedecides: &$"& Thecommunicationisinadmissible. (#(