WPCt  M6G"5yWdDp<RbB œ})ҽˣ\ey\1C9gUi^Eqk/FNؔ퉣`g,īSkHh1<{'41RI0VT @ݕ0u/ qTxUDKe^ϧF0D.K"'1Kژ8;ED} ]@dPWE(0bc%)'񕵽!5@&c|% 8PӸl支^ 0nh 0Y 0_/ 0i 0 0( D+ AM . 0> # UN % M ( N5 ^ 7 wC 4G [ m] \  `&Times New Roman' D.F. et al. v. Sweden, Communication No. 183/1984 (26 March 1985), U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/14U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/1"Angie Dituri"0Angie Dituri .   <:Default ParaXXX64Hyperlink    <:FollowedHype    < :Normal (Web) S =jS =jSӁ Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5(2$  !..      XXXXXXXX  ($'dxd A<< c#|x($..      X@XXXX@XXX@HP LaserJet 4000 Series PS0(hH  Z6Times New Roman RegularXҥ) Kk)U  !..      XXXXXXXX  _ HUMANRIGHTSCOMMITTEE  D.F.etal.v.Sweden | CommunicationNo.183/1984 H 26March1985  d ADMISSIBILITY     Submittedby:D.F.(namedeleted)on9April1984 x  Allegedvictim:Theauthoretal. D  Stateparty:Sweden ` Declaredinadmissible:26March1985(twentyfourthsession) ,    DecisiononAdmissibility     1.1.Theauthorofthecommunicationdated9April1984,D.F.,isaSwedishcitizen,born @ inAustriaon23 &v April1942.Heclaimstosubmitthecommunicationonhisownbehalfand,itappears,on B behalfofArabsandMuslims(notfurtherspecified)whoallegedlyhaveconstantlybeenthe ( targetsofdiscriminationandabuseinSweden.Theauthorsubmitsthathiscommunication  revealsbreachesbySwedenofthefollowingarticlesoftheInternationalCovenantonCivil  andPoliticalRights:article2,paragraph1,article5,paragraph1,article7,article14,   paragraphs1,2,3(d),(e)and(g),article15,paragraph1,article17,article25(a),andarticle p!  26. V"! 1.2.Astostepstakentoexhaustdomesticremedies,theauthorsubmitsthetextofareply "$r# addressedtohimon12July1983bytheOfficeoftheAttorneyGeneral,inresponsetohis %X $ requestthattheAttorneyGeneralbringtotrialthoseresponsibleforacartoonwhich %>!% appearedinaStockholmnewspaperandwhichtheauthorconsideredtorevealracialhatred &$"& againstArabs.ThereplyinformedD.F.thattheAttorneyGeneraldidnotintendtotakeany ' #' actiononthebasisofhiscomplaint. (#( 2.Asitisobligedtodo,underarticle5,paragraph2(a),oftheOptionalProtocol,the l*%* HumanRightsCommitteehasascertainedthatD.F.hasalsofiledanapplicationwiththe R+&+ EuropeanCommissionofHumanRights,whichispendingforconsiderationbeforethat 8,', body. -n(- Ї3.TheHumanRightsCommitteehascarefullyreviewedthecommunicationsubmittedby  D.F.,includingadossierofvariousenclosurespurportingtosubstantiatehisclaims.Apart  frombeingbarredfromconsideringacommunication,ifthesamematterisbe | _ing_Ԁexaminedunderanotherprocedureofinternationalinvestigationorsettlement(art.5, H para.2(a),or'theOptionalProtocol),suchastheprocedureimplementedbytheEuropean . ~ CommissionofHumanRights,theHumanRightsCommitteehasreachedtheconclusion  d thatthecommunicationdoesnotinanymannersubstantiatetheauthor'sclaimthatheis  J personallyavictimofanyallegedviolationoftheInternationalCovenantonCiviland  0 PoliticalRights.Inaddition,thecommunicationdoesnotrevealthattheauthorhasany    authoritytospeakonbehalfofotherpersons,whoserightshepurportstoprotect.    4.Asthecommunicationfailstofulfiltherequirementsofarticles2and5,paragraph2(a), x  oftheOptionalProtocol,theHumanRightsCommitteedecides: ^  Thecommunicationisinadmissible.