WPC e#&/}9j'-$ xs[bgnD.[6QO$ta$ߑ67]SSCўDKֳ֥Vk_UD?=H[EB͢9 \W0;еIb ;o"Ҕj 72W<]54}k='.SK~*l!豶i޴^ÀvNe06|@Yaq pTK ]0xp/NT5<஝pR&r<|Qy3B`TWYj~J44k_ᑕEޙկh <kH 6ĂQ0O(4sS I΂"`*~-Y&1Cw`O&PZ,kį$#ѫq 2ⱌs0pWSTjAZϞơzŲU>l 0v 0<+ 0Yg 0_ 0i 0N 0( D+G AMr  0 # UNF % M ( N ^ w 4  m \  `&Times New Roman' N. S. v. Canada, Communication No. 26/1978 (28 July 1978), U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/1 at 19 (194CCPR/C/OP/1 at 19 (19"Angie Dituri"0Angie Dituri .   6F , 4Heading 3 S p^S   XXX p^S<:Default Para64Hyperlink    <:FollowedHype    < :Normal (Web) S =jS =jSӁ Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5(22A$ 5n!..      X)XXXX)XXX)  ($'dxd A<< c#|x(5n$..      X-XXXX-XXX-HP LaserJet 4000 Series PS0(hH  Z6Times New Roman RegularXj<) .):i+00U 5n!..      X)XXXX)XXX)  _ HUMANRIGHTSCOMMITTEE  N.S.v.Canada | CommunicationNo.26/1978 H 28July1978  d ADMISSIBILITY     Submittedby:N.S.on19January1978 x  Allegedvictim:Theauthor D  Stateparty:Canada ` Dateofdecisiononinadmissibility:28July1978(fourthsession) ,  4     DecisiononAdmissibility     Theauthorofthecommunication(initialletterdated19January1978withenclosuresand @ furtherletterdated25April1978)isa45yearoldIndiancitizenresidinginCanada,who &v workedfortheDepartmentofIndianAffairsandNorthernDevelopment,Governmentof  \ Canada,from19March1973untilhewasdismissedfromhispostasateacherinapublic B schoolon10December1976.Heclaimsthathewasdismissedbecauseofhisraceand ( religionandthathefailedinhisrecoursetothePublicServiceStaffRelationsBoardbecause  theAdjudicatorwasbiased,ignoredevidenceandrenderedadecisionbasedonpreconceived  views.AftertheexpiryofthetimelimitforappealtheauthorappliedtotheFederalCourt   ofAppealforanextensionofthetimetoappeal.Extensionoftimetoappealwasnotgranted p!  andhisapplicationwasdismissedon14November1977.Theauthorconcludesthat, V"! accordingly,hehasexhausteddomesticremedies. <#" Theauthorcallsforassistancetoobtainjusticeandhisreinstatement.Heallegesthatheis %X $ avictimofviolationsofarticles2,7,14,17and26oftheCovenant. %>!% Beforeconsideringacommunicationfromanindividualwhoclaimstobeavictimofa ' #' violationoftheCovenant,theCommitteeshallascertain,underarticle5(2)(b)ofthe (#( OptionalProtocolthathehasexhaustedallavailabledomesticremedies. )$) Inthepresentcasetheauthorfailedtoavailhimselfintimeoftheremedyofappeal.Further, R+&+ thecommunicationdoesnotdisclosetheexistenceofanyspecialcircumstanceswhichmight 8,', haveabsolvedtheauthor,accordingtothegenerallyrecognizedrulesofinternationallaw, -n(- fromexhaustingthedomesticremediesathisdisposal.Hecannot,therefore,beconsidered  tohaveexhaustedtheremediesavailabletohimunderCanadianlaw.  TheHumanRightsCommitteethereforedecides: b Thecommunicationisinadmissible. . ~