WPC ץ?>}K3a Q2ؿ%E7 %G˜  *IW*J/C14%q0[:UMPehVnɣA,!i, L4J)ߛr|&O]zu@Ҩڅ60J4/3"Krʂߝ7՜o;a L巓ث"(y.OWxoH*GG]#qMqcꢟ{h=꫻p\r8 wg8ΕHЗ0~oۛzޭ05YYP٠)@h"|΋M)>We7Iy3 t\̫hV &}ҧ9> QF ;,l 0v 0<+ 0Yg 0_ 0i 0N 0( D+G AMr  0 # UNF % M ( N ^ w 4  m \  `&Times New Roman' D. B. v. Canada, Communication No. 15/1977 (24 April 1979), U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/OP/1 at 20 (14 CCPR/C/OP/1 at 20 (1"Angie Dituri"0Angie Dituri .   6F , 4Heading 3 S p^S   XXX p^S<:Default Para64Hyperlink    <:FollowedHype    < :Normal (Web) S =jS =jSӁ Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5(2A$ U\!..      X=_XXXX=_XXX=_  ($'dxd A<< c#|x(U\$..      X XXXX XXX HP LaserJet 4000 Series PS0(hH  Z6Times New Roman RegularXU<) 7):i+00U U\!..      X=_XXXX=_XXX=_  _ HUMANRIGHTSCOMMITTEE  D.B.v.Canada | CommunicationNo.15/1977 H 24April1979  d ADMISSIBILITY     Submittedby:D.B.on8August1977 x  Ѐ Allegedvictim:Theauthor D  Stateparty:Canada ` Dateofdecisiononinadmissibility:24April1979(sixthsession) ,   DecisiononAdmissibility     Thecommunication,comprisingtheinitialletterdated8August1977andsubsequentletters @ dated21Marchand25December1978,issubmittedbyD.B.,aCanadiancitizenwho &v appearsalsotoholdBritishandFrenchnationality.Fromthematerialsubmittedbythe  \ author,itappearsthathehad,priortotheentryintoforceoftheInternationalCovenanton B CivilandPoliticalRightsforCanada,accumulatedanumberoftines,imposedforbreaches ( ofparkingregulations,whichherefusedtopay.Asaconsequence,itappears,theauthorwas  repeatedlyarrested,from1975to1977,underwarrantsofarrestissuedbytheMunicipal  CourtofMontreal,whichmetedoutseveralsentencesofpaymentoffinesorimprisonment   inlieuofpaymentoffinesorforcontemptofcourt.Itfurtherappearsfromthematerial p!  submittedbytheauthorthathehasalsobeensentencedtoimprisonmentforrefusaltopay V"! alimonytohisexwife. <#" TheauthorclaimsthattheMunicipalCourtofMontrealdidnothavecompetencetoactin %X $ hiscase,thatthenentirejudicialsystemofCanadaiscorruptandthatthejudges,the %>!% membersofthelegalprofessionandthemunicipalauthoritiesofMontrealhaveconsistently &$"& floutedhisrightsunderthelaw,inviolationofseveralarticlesoftheCovenant. ' #' Beforeconsideringacommunicationonthemerits,theCommitteemustascertainwhether )$) itfulfilsthebasicconditionsrelatingtoitsadmissibilityundertheOptionalProtocol.Inthis l*%* connection,theCommitteehas_endeavoured_Ԁtoelicitfromtheauthorclarificationsregarding R+&+ questionsofadmissibilityofthecommunicationandthefactscomplainedof. 8,',  -n(- AthoroughexaminationbytheCommitteeofallthematerialsubmittedbytheauthor,  includinghislastsubmission,dated25December1978,inresponsetotheCommittee's  requestforclarifications,hasnotrevealedanypreciseallegationsoffactinsubstantiation | oftheclaimthatheisavictimofviolationsbytheStatepartyofanyoftherightssetforth b intheCovenant. H TheHumanRightsCommitteethereforedecides:  d Thecommunicationisinadmissible.  0