WPC] ~!H?"=ғʆ{ZS, @e~ۍosM`13`iC@qs'ڣZd `yAXYړ)kW3cm0F9*cOK;K3R5AamwovJ 礸}C4U;ļkP $mXA'\&` wp_?$қ^xN"/Dv I' j[s3L,ɲTV}ʌ*IS^:?c /Z^.w<.Z^M#X뚰Ԣ}j/SC.RjOZ_߅i#'3^y ;B<-` )cb^?>ŲQѬz ax<3.%1VBZ92G0qA s-u"W I"kzQ3Owm\kjU>z 0Z 0< 0YK 0_ 0i 0Tl 0 0(g D+ AM  0 # UN % M ( N^ w,40D mF\  `&Times New Roman'  "Angie Dituri"0Angie Dituri .   6F , 4Heading 3 S p^S   XXX p^S<:Default Para64Hyperlink    <:FollowedHype    < :Normal (Web) S =jS =jS42Emphasis    ԁ Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5(2:M$ !..      X{XXXX{XXX{  ($'dxd A<< c#|x($..      Xz7XXXXz7XXXz7HP LaserJet 4000 Series PS0(hH  Z6Times New Roman RegularXvw) Kk):i+00U !..      X{XXXX{XXX{  _ HUMANRIGHTSCOMMITTEE  _R.T.Z._Ԁv.TheNetherlands | CommunicationNo.245/1987 H 5November1987  d ADMISSIBILITY     Submittedby:R.T.Z.(namedeleted)on1October1987 x  Allegedvictim:Theauthor D  Stateparty:TheNetherlands ` Declaredinadmissible:5November1987(thirtyfirstsession)* ,    DecisiononAdmissibility     1.TheauthorofthecommunicationdatedIOctober1987(2pageletterand22pagesof @ enclosures,allinDutch)isacitizenoftheNetherlands,bornin1960.residinginHaarlem. &v theNetherlands.HeclaimstobethevictimofaviolationbytheGovernmentofthe  \ Netherlandsofarticle26oftheInternationalCovenantonCivilandPoliticalRights.Heis B representedbycounsel. ( 2.1.Theauthorstatesthathewassummonedtoappearbeforeamilitarycourtbecauseofhis  refusaltoobeyordersinthecourseofhismilitaryservice.IntheNetherlands,itispossible   forcitizenstoobjecttoasummons.Iftheydoso,thejudgeisrequiredtodecideonthe p!  objectionbeforethecourtproceedingsbegin.Apersonwhoissubjecttomilitaryjurisdiction V"! duringtheperiodofcompulsorymilitaryservicedoesnothavethisright.becausemilitary <#" penalproceduresdonotenvisagethepossibilityofanappealagainstasummons.Thus,the "$r# authorisunabletoappealagainstthesummonsbeforethemilitarycourt. %X $ 2.2.Theauthorclaimsthatthisconstitutesaviolationofarticle26oftheCovenantsincehe &$"& isbeingtreateddifferentlyfromcivilianswhoaregiventhepossibilitytoappealagainsta ' #' summonsbeforethestartofcourtproceedings. (#( 2.3.Withrespecttotherequirementofexhaustionofdomesticremedies,theauthorstates l*%* thathetookhiscasetothehighestadministrativeorganintheNetherlands,the R+&+ AdministrativeRechtspraakOverheidsbeschikkingen(AROB),whichdeclaredhisappeal 8,', inadmissible. -n(- Ї2.4.TheCommitteehasascertainedthattheauthor'scasehasnotbeensubmittedtoanother  procedureofinternationalinvestigationorsettlement.  3.1.Beforeconsideringanyclaimscontainedinacommunication,theHumanRights b Committeeshall,inaccordancewithrule87ofitsprovisionalrulesofprocedure,decide H whetherornotitisadmissibleundertheOptionalProtocoltotheCovenant. . ~ 3.2.TheCommitteeobservesthat,inthecaseaissue,theauthorhasnotclaimedtobethe  J victimofdiscriminationonanygroundsprohibitedunderarticle26oftheCovenant.He  0 merelyallegesthatheisbeingsubjectedtodifferenttreatmentduringtheperiodofhis    militaryservicebecausehecannotappealagainstasummonslikeacivilian.TheCommittee    observesthattheCovenantdoesnotprecludetheinstitutionofcompulsorymilitaryservice   byStatesparties,eventhoughthismeansthattherightsofindividualsmayberestricted x  duringmilitaryservice,withintheexigenciesofsuchservice.TheCommitteenotes,inthis ^  connection,thattheauthorhasnotclaimedthattheNetherlandsmilitarypenalprocedures D  arenotbeingappliedequallytoallNetherlandscitizensservingintheNetherlandsarmed *z  forces.Itthereforeconcludesthattheauthorhasnoclaimunderarticle2oftheOptional ` Protocol. F 4.TheHumanRightsCommitteethereforedecides:  (a)Thatthecommunicationisinadmissible;  (b)Thatthisdecisionshallbecommunicatedtotheauthorand,forinformation,totheState Z party. @ ____________ B */Pursuanttorule85oftheprovisionalrulesofprocedure.CommitteememberMr,Joseph  Mommersteegdidnottakepartintheadoptionofthedecision.