WPC q6%=uK.\a16+͉$ ܴm\Φ:X$qH,m+,o7#6@J֗]QM580jV\(|?ne􈆵$&ȵ@JuրDٺ3PʃBhC.ZՈduN[~LP 30@Юr|)_6} 0Pvih/(GZӞV~_MIۊD˾ulA.tύ/rX|ܻF5R</ݩ!Ux̕GNqСziUl%=xUgۨG/:2:i+cǩP00=?cZ(B{5-s`1S&ٛ'(YI7ksN&)اU(R&:Y N+U>z 0 0<9 0Yu 0_ 0i- 0P 0 0( D+ AM - 0= # UN %M(ND^ FwR4Vj ml\  `&Times New Roman' R. L. [name deleted] v. Canada, Communication No. 342/1988 (7 April 1989), U.N. Doc. Supp.4989), U.N. Doc. Supp."Angie Dituri"0Angie Dituri .   6F , 4Heading 3 S p^S   XXX p^S<:Default Para64Hyperlink    <:FollowedHype    < :Normal (Web) S =jS =jS0.Strong     ԁ Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5(2?$ @!..      X{XXXX{XXX{  ($'dxd A<< c#|x(@$..      XkXXXXkXXXkHP LaserJet 6P/6MP - Standard,,,,,,0(hH  Z6Times New Roman RegularX8m* p*:i+00U @!..      X{XXXX{XXX{  _ HUMANRIGHTSCOMMITTEE  R.L.v.Canada | CommunicationNo.342/1988 H 7April1989  d ADMISSIBILITY     Submittedby:R.L.[namedeleted] x  Allegedvictims:Theauthor D  Statepartyconcerned:Canada ` Dateofcommunication:1June1988 ,   TheHumanRightsCommittee,establishedunderarticle28oftheInternationalCovenant  onCivilandPoliticalRights, t Meetingon7April1989, @ Adoptsthefollowing:  \   Decisiononadmissibility     1.Theauthorofthecommunication,dated1June1988,isR.L.,aCanadiancitizencurrently p!  residingintheprovinceofQuebec.Heclaimstobeavictimofviolationsofhishuman V"! rightsbytheCanadiancourts,allegingthatduringbankruptcyproceedingshisrightsto <#" equalitybeforethelawandtoafairtrialweredenied.Inparticular,heallegesthatthejudges "$r# inboththetrialandtheappellatecourtsreliedonfalseevidenceandclearlyfavouredthe %X $ otherparty,alawyerofaprestigiouslawfirminbothprocedureandsubstance.Hefurther %>!% claimsthatalldecisionsrenderedweretheproductofbadfaithandbiasonthepartofthe &$"& judges. ' #' 2.Withregardtotheissueofexhaustionofdomesticremedies,theauthorclaimsthatit )$) wouldbefutiletofilefurtherappealsonthegroundoftheunfairattitudeallegedlyexhibited l*%* bytheJudges.Heencloses,however,acopyofapetitionforadeclaratoryjudgement,dated R+&+ 31May1988,inwhichheaskstheSuperiorCourtoftheDistrictofMontrealtodeclarethat 8,', therightstoequalitybeforethelawandtoafairtrialasenshrinedintheCanadianand -n(- QuebecChartersofRightsandLiberties,applytohim.  3.Beforeconsideringanyclaimscontainedinacommunication,theCommitteemust | ascertainwhetheritfulfilsthebasicconditionsofadmissibilityundertheOptionalProtocol. b 4.Athoroughexaminationofthematerialsubmittedbytheauthordoesnotrevealany . ~ substantiationoftheclaim,forpurposesofadmissibility,thatheisavictimofviolationsby  d theStatepartyofanyoftherightssetforthintheInternationalCovenantonCiviland  J PoliticalRights.Furthermore,theauthorhasacknowledgedthathehasnotexhaustedall  0 domesticremedies,whichheisrequiredtodounderarticle5,paragraph2(b),ofthe    OptionalProtocol.Thecommunicationdoesnotdisclosetheexistenceofanyspecial    circumstanceswhichmighthaveabsolvedtheauthorfromexhaustingthedomesticremedies   athisdisposal.TheCommitteeconcludesthattherequirementsfordeclaringthe x  communicationadmissibleundertheOptionalProtocolhavenotbeenmet. ^  5.TheHumanRightsCommitteethereforedecides: *z  (a)Thatthecommunicationisinadmissible; F (b)Thatthisdecisionbecommunicatedtotheauthorand,forinformation,totheStateparty.