WPC" :21zRGa}A4TT.aF*{]>M;nLv]LX2,MDY?Vk5/[\'祤7K7 ^ 1/"Bįיx"IuUkF56dI8G;/?r^ XFgs!*9Aw1*NQ1H !]tf R,;"nLܵjcԓJ \ 0U9 0 0k 0* 0 0 0C 0 0 0& 0 0 0] 0 0 0@ 0 0d 0 0 0o 0 0 0[ 0 0 0 02 0< 0f f a a3 fG aI B-] f a f a f a f a f a f B8 a!f+!a-!-!^A!Brother MFC-490CW Printer0&d9 Z6Times New Roman RegularX($UKUS.,ԩn;5 1h;՞k1 3|xU\  `*Times New RomanTT(5hCEKQW]cioAutoList11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1. 1.3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)i)(;3$2#  0  .3  0  88889Hairline!dxdx\  `&Times New Roman*+ (_2623  ..*D+D (_25   ," <DL,23  ..," <DL,   *5+5 (_24  ) <DL)23  ..) <DL)  *2+2 (_23 ` &<<DL&23  ..&<<DL& ` */+/ (_22  #DL#23  ..#DL#  *,+, (_21   DL 23  .. DL  *)+) (_20 h DDL23  ..DDL h *&+& (_19  L23  ..L  *#+# (_18   L23  .. L  *>> (_17  2( 4 <DL223  Ԁ2( 4 <DL2  *DD (_16   ," <DL,23  Ԁ," <DL,   *55 (_15  ) <DL)23  Ԁ) <DL)  *22 (_14 ` &<<DL&23  Ԁ&<<DL& ` *// (_13  #DL#23  Ԁ#DL#  *,, (_12   DL 23  Ԁ DL  *)) (_11 h DDL23  ԀDDL h *&& (_10  L23  ԀL  (## &_9   L23  Ԁ L  (>> &_8  2( 4 <DL223  2( 4 <DL2  (DD &_7   ," <DL,23  ," <DL,   (55 &_6  ) <DL)23  ) <DL)  (22 &_5 ` &<<DL&23  &<<DL& ` (// &_4  #DL#23  #DL#  (,, &_3   DL 23   DL  ()) &_2 h DDL23  DDL h (&& &_1  L23  L  &## $_   L23   L  6~ q4heading 3   2( 4 <DL2  UK XXX     US   2( 4 <DL2  <:Default Para<nn:footnote tex   2( 4 <DL2 UK XXX US   2( 4 <DL2  Table_ATable_ATABLE A)Hairline dTable_AhTABLE ATable_ATable_ATABLE B dTABLE ATABLE C TTRX3'LetterO'3Letter Landscape3'Letterter Landscape'3Letter Landscape 1July2005  -\(  aT !UKUS.,  _ XX    ANGOLA#XX@#   k FollowupJurisprudence    ActionbyTreatyBodies    _CCPR_ԀA/56/40,volI(2001)  t   XXXXChapterIV.FollowupActivitiesundertheOptionalProtocol L    ... $ t  180.TheCommitteespreviousannualreport(A/55/40,vol.I,chap.VI)containedadetailed L  countrybycountrysurveyonfollowuprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstandingasof30June 8  2000.Thelistthatfollowsupdatesthatsurvey,indicatingthosecasesinwhichrepliesare $  outstanding,butdoesnottakeintoaccounttheCommitteesViewsadoptedduringtheseventy   secondsession,forwhichfollowuprepliesarenotyetdue.Inmanycasestherehasbeennochange   sincethepreviousreport.#XXX X#  Angola: p ViewsinonecasefindingviolationsoftheCovenant: H 711/1996Dias(A/55/40);nofollowupreply.On21January2001theauthorvisited_OHCHR_Ԁand  p informedthattheStatepartyhadnotimplementedtheCommitteesrecommendations.  \   4 _ _CCPR_ԀA/57/40,vol.I(2002)   ChapterVI.Followupactivitiesundertheoptionalprotocol  ... ` 228.ThepreviousannualreportoftheCommittee(A/56/40,vol.I,chap.VI)containedadetailed 8  countrybycountrysurveyoffollowuprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstandingasof30June $ t 2001.Thelistthatfollowsupdatesthatsurvey,indicatingthosecasesinwhichrepliesare  ` outstanding,butdoesnotincluderesponsesconcerningtheCommitteesViewsadoptedduringthe  L  seventyfourthandseventyfifthsessions,forwhichfollowuprepliesarenotyetdue.Inmanycases  8  therehasbeennochangesincethepreviousreport. $  Angola:Viewsinonecasewithfindingsofviolations:   711/1996Dias(A/55/40);nofollowupreply.On21January2001theauthorvisited_OHCHR_Ԁand   informedthattheStatepartyhadnotimplementedtheCommitteesrecommendations.See p paragraph[231]below. \ ... 4 229.ForfurtherinformationonthestatusofalltheViewsinwhichfollowupinformationremains  \ outstandingorinrespectofwhichfollowupconsultationshavebeenorwillbescheduled,reference H ismadetothefollowupprogressreportpreparedfortheseventy-fourthsessionoftheCommittee 4 (_CCPR_/C/74/R.7/Rev.1,dated28March2002),discussedinpublicsessionattheCommittees   2009thmeetingon4April2002(_CCPR_/C/SR.2009).ReferenceisalsomadetotheCommittees   previousreports,inparticularA/56/40,paragraphs182to200.  Overviewoffollowuprepliesreceivedduringthereportingperiod,SpecialRapporteursfollowup  consultationsandotherdevelopments l 230.TheCommitteewelcomesthefollowuprepliesthathavebeenreceivedduringthereporting D! periodandexpressesitsappreciationforallthemeasurestakenorenvisagedtoprovidevictimsof 0"  violationsoftheCovenantwithaneffectiveremedy.ItencouragesallStatespartieswhichhave #l! addressedpreliminaryfollowuprepliestotheSpecialRapporteurtoconcludetheirinvestigations $X" inasexpeditiousamanneraspossibleandtoinformtheSpecialRapporteuroftheirresults.The $D # followuprepliesreceivedduringtheperiodunderreviewandotherdevelopmentsaresummarized %0!$ below. &"% 231.Angola:WithregardtocaseNo.711/1996,Dias(A/55/40),theSpecialRapporteurmetwith (#' representativesoftheStatepartyattheCommitteesseventyfourthsessioninMarch2002,the )$( delegationinformedtheSpecialRapporteurthatinformationwouldbesupplied.Todatethishas |*%) notbeenreceived. h+&* ... T,'+  @-(,  CEUK.,_CCPR_ԀA/58/40,vol.I(2003)   CHAPTERVI.FollowupactivitiesundertheOptionalProtocol  ... ` 223.ThepreviousannualreportoftheCommittee1containedadetailedcountrybycountrysurvey 8  offollowuprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstandingasof30June2002.Thelistthatfollows $ t updatesthatsurvey,indicatingthosecasesinwhichrepliesareoutstanding,butdoesnotinclude  ` responsesconcerningtheCommitteesViewsadoptedduringtheseventyseventhandseventyeighth  L  sessions,forwhichfollowuprepliesarenotyetdueinthemajorityofcases.Inmanycasesthere  8  hasbeennochangesincethepreviousreport.* $  Angola:0 ` 0 ` (#` (#Viewsinonecasewithfindingsofviolations:  (# (# 0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#711/1996Dias(A/55/40);nofollowupreply.SeealsoA/57/40, p paragraphs228and231.\ (# (# Notes  p 1.[OfficialRecordsoftheGeneralAssembly],FiftyseventhSession,SupplementNo.40(A/57/40), H vol.I,chap.VI. 4 *ThedocumentsymbolA/[SessionNo.]/40referstotheOfficialRecordoftheGeneralAssembly   inwhichthecaseappears;annexVIreferstothepresentreport,vol.II.      _CCPR_Ԁ_CCPR_/C/80/FU/1(2004)    Follow-UpProgressReportsubmittedbyTheSpecialRapporteurforFollow-UponViews  t Follow-upprogressreport L  1.ThecurrentreportupdatesthepreviousFollow-upProgressReport,(_CCPR_/C/71/R.13)[Ed.Note: $ t _CCPR_/C/71/R.13isnotpubliclyavailable]which_focused_Ԁoncasesinwhich,bytheendofFebruary  ` 2001,nooronlyincompletefollow-upinformationhadbeenreceivedfromStatesparties,orwhere  L  follow-upinformationchallengedthefindingsandrecommendationsoftheCommittee.Inaneffort  8  toreducethesizeofthefollow-upreport,thiscurrentreportonlyreflectscasesinwhichinformation $  wasreceivedfromeithertheauthorortheStatepartyfrom1March2001to2April2004.Itisthe   intentionoftheSpecialRapporteurtoupdatethisreportonanannualbasis.   Angola:   Dias,Carlosv.Angola,Caseno.711/1996,Viewsadoptedon18April2000 \ Violationfound:Article9,paragraph1 4 Issuesofcase:Failuretoinvestigatecrimescommittedbypersonsinauthority;harassmentofthe  \ authorandimpossibilitytoreturntoAngola. H Remedyrecommended:Adequatemeasurestoprotecttheauthor'spersonalsecurityfromthreatsof   anykind.   DeadlineforStatepartyfollow-upinformation:17July2000  Follow-upinformationfromStateParty:None l Follow-upinformationreceivedfromauthor:Seepreviousfollow-upreport(_CCPR_/C/71/R.13)or D! theCommitteesAnnualReport(A/57/40,Vol.1,ChapterVI). 0"  ConsultationswithStateparty:InMarch2002,duringthe74thsession,theSpecialRapporteurmet $X" withrepresentativesoftheStateparty,whoinformedtheSpecialRapporteurthatinformationwould $D # besupplied.Nonehasbeenreceived. %0!$ SpecialRapporteur'srecommendations:FurtherremindertobeaddressedtoStateparty. '#& ... (#' UK.,CE.,CEUK.,  )$(  _CCPR_ԀA/59/40vol.I(2004)   CHAPTERVI.FOLLOWUPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL  ... ` 230.ThepreviousannualreportoftheCommittee1containedadetailedcountry-by-countrysurvey L  offollowuprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstandingasof30June2003.Thelistthatfollows 8  updatesthatsurvey,indicatingthosecasesinwhichrepliesareoutstanding,butdoesnotinclude $ t responsesconcerningtheCommitteesViewsadoptedduringtheeightiethandeightyfirstsessions,  ` forwhichfollowuprepliesarenotyetdueinthemajorityofcases.Inmanycasestherehasbeen  L  nochangesincethepreviousreport.*  8  *34 ddd Xdd Xdd X(#(#,UU,UU+  1'   1Angola:UK.,CE.,R$USUK.,    Viewsinonecasewithfindingsofviolations: 6,   6  t  711/1996Dias(A/55/40);nofollowupreplyreceiveddespite t  consultationswiththeSpecialRapporteurduringtheseventy-fourth `  session.SeealsoA/57/40,paragraphs228and231.Inthefollowup L report(_CCPR_/C/80/FU1),adoptedbytheCommitteeduringitseightieth 8 session,theSpecialRapporteurrecommendedthatafurtherreminderfor $t informationonfollowupbesenttotheState ` party.UK.,US.,(CEUK.,$L   $_______________ t Notes ` 1/.Ibid.,FiftyeighthSession,SupplementNo.40(A/58/40),vol.I,chap.VI. 8 *ThedocumentsymbolA/[sessionNo.]/40referstotheOfficialRecordsoftheGeneralAssembly  ` inwhichthecaseappears;annexIXreferstothepresentreport,volumeII.  L UK.,CE.,+CEUK.,UK.,CE.,-  "$! CEUK., _CCPR_,A/60/40vol.I(2005)   CHAPTERVI.FOLLOWUPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL t 224.InJuly1990,theCommitteeestablishedaprocedureforthemonitoringoffollowuptoits L  Viewsunderarticle5,paragraph4,oftheOptionalProtocol,andcreatedthemandateoftheSpecial 8  RapporteurforthefollowuponViewstothiseffect.Mr.AndohasbeentheSpecialRapporteur $ t sinceMarch2001(seventyfirstsession).  ` 225.In1991,theSpecialRapporteurbegantorequestfollowupinformationfromStatesparties.  8  SuchinformationhasbeensystematicallyrequestedinrespectofallViewswithafindingofa $  violationofCovenantrights.Atotalof391Viewsoutofthe503Viewsadoptedsince1979   concludedthattherehadbeenaviolationoftheCovenant.   228.Inmanycases,theSecretariathasalsoreceivedinformationfromcomplainantstotheeffect   thattheCommitteesViewshavenotbeenimplemented.Conversely,inrareinstances,thepetitioner p hasinformedtheCommitteethattheStatepartyhasinfactgiveneffecttotheCommittees \ recommendations,eventhoughtheStatepartydidnotitselfprovidethatinformation. H 229.Thepresentannualreportadoptsadifferentformatforthepresentationoffollowup  p informationcomparedtopreviousannualreports.Thetablebelowdisplaysacompletepictureof  \ followuprepliesfromStatespartiesreceivedasof28July2005,inrelationtoViewsinwhichthe H CommitteefoundviolationsoftheCovenant.Whereverpossible,itindicateswhetherfollowup 4 repliesareorhavebeenconsideredassatisfactoryorunsatisfactory,intermsofcomplyingwiththe   CommitteesViews,orwhetherthedialoguebetweentheStatepartyandtheSpecialRapporteurfor   followuponViewscontinues.Thenotesfollowinganumberofcaseentriesconveyanideaofthe  difficultiesincategorizingfollowupreplies.  230.FollowupinformationprovidedbyStatespartiesandbypetitionersortheirrepresentatives l sincethelastannualreportissetoutinanewannexVII,c_ontained_ԀinVolumeIIofthepresent X  annualreport.This,moredetailed,followupinformationalsoindicatesactionstilloutstandingin D! thosecasesthatremainunderreview. 0"    $D # TRO'3#Avery 12-294/295 Laser Ta LandscapeX3' Letter'3Letter LandscapeLaser Ta Landscape3'LetterT   FOLLOWUPRECEIVEDTODATEFORALLCASESOFVIOLATIONSOFTHECOVENANT   :*6D7ed dUUUU34..,'bZ,4bZ, bZ,'bZ,bZ,bZ,bb+  6DD'zz @6XXXXT XXUK.,CE.,.Statepartyand  numberofcases J withviolation#T  T<##XX T<#CEUK., ;DD,! b@DD @;XXXXT XXUK.,CE.,=Communicationnumber,  authorand_locationa_#T  T=##XX T=#CEUK., ;DD,!J@DD @;  XXXXT XXFollowupresponsereceivedfrom   Statepartyandlocation#T  T4?##XX TS?# ;DD,!J @DD @;Satisfactory   response ;DD,!p @DD @;Unsatisfactor   yresponse ;DD,!p@DD @;Nofollow  upresponse ?DDD,!p@DD @?Followup  dialogue p ongoing NDD?'^ @  DDD @NAngola(2) ;DD,!\ @DD @;711/1996,Dias \  A/55/40 ;DD,!J @DD @;  ;DD,!\ @DD @; ;DD,!\ @DD @; ;DD,!\ @DD @;X ?DDD,!\ @DD @?X NDD?'\ @  DDD @N ;DD,!H @DD @;1128/2002,Marques H  A/60/40 ;DD,!6 @DD @;  ;DD,!H @DD @; ;DD,!H  @DD @; ;DD,!H !@DD @;X ?DDD,!H "@DD @?  X KDDD:'H #@  DDD @K... =DDD,!4 $@DDD @= =DDD,!4 %@DDD @= =DDD,!4 &@DDD @= =DDD,!4 '@DDD @= =DDD,!4 (@DDD @= ?DDDD,!4 )@DDD @?7-+4 *@   DDDD 7aThelocationreferstothedocumentsymboloftheOfficialRecordsoftheGeneralAssembly,SupplementNo.40,whichistheannual h + reportoftheCommitteetotherespectivesessionsoftheAssembly. V ,   0 TRX3'Avery 12-294/295 Laser TaO'3#Avery 12-294/295 Laser Ta Landscape3'Letter2-294/295 Laser Ta@# '3Letter LandscapeLaser Ta LandscapeT _CCPR_,A/60/40vol.II(2005)   ... t AnnexVII ` FOLLOW-UPOFTHEHUMANRIGHTSCOMMITTEEONINDIVIDUAL 8  COMMUNICATIONSUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOLTOTHEINTERNATIONAL $ t COVENANTONCIVILANDPOLITICALRIGHTS  ` ThisreportsetsoutallinformationprovidedbyStatespartiesandauthorsortheircounselsincethe  8  lastAnnualReport(A/59/40). $  *9:ded'bZ'4bZ4 bZ 'bZ'bZbZbb6D7(#(#,UU,UU+  1'   1 Stateparty UK.,CE.,>     ANGOLA 6,   6 Case USUK.,  `  UK.,US.,NCarlosDiaz,711/1996 6,`   6 Viewsadoptedon  d 20March2000 6,d  6 Issuesandviolations  found     Noseriousinvestigationofcrimescommittedbypersoninhighposition,  harassmentoftheauthorandwitnessessothattheycannotreturntoAngola,  lossofproperty-article9,paragraph1. ?5  ? Remedy T recommended  @   Aneffectiveremedyandtotakeadequatemeasurestoprotecthispersonal T securityfromthreatsofanykind. ?5@  ? DuedateforState D partyresponse  0 17July2000 6,D  6 Statepartyresponse    None 6,!  6 Furtheraction H " taken/required USUK.,  4!#   Duringtheeighty-secondsession,on1November2004,theSpecial H $ RapporteurmetwitharepresentativeoftheStateparty.Therepresentative 4!% arguedthattheauthorhadnotexhausteddomesticremediesandthatthe  "p& allegedincidenthadtakenplacebeforetheOptionalProtocolcameinto  #\' force.Thus,inhisview,theCommitteeshouldhaveconsideredthecase #H( inadmissible.TheSpecialRapporteurexplainedthefollow-upprocedure, $4 ) theissueof continuingeffectsunderwhichtheCommitteehadconsidered % !* itwithinitscompetencetoconsiderthecaseandthefailureoftheState & "+ partytorespondtorequestsforinformationpriortoandfollowingthe '", CommitteesViews.Therepresentativestatedthathewouldrelaythe (#- outcomeofthismeetingtohiscapitalandrequestawrittenresponsetothe )$. CommitteesViews.Noinformationwasreceived. ?5l*%/  ?UK.,US.,RUSUK.,     AfurthermeetingwiththesamerepresentativeoftheStatepartytookplace  duringtheeighty-fourthsession.Therepresentativereiteratedhisviewthat   theauthorhadnotexhausteddomesticremediesandthattheCommittee  shouldnothavedeclaredthecaseadmissible.Furthermore,itwasnottrue t thattheAngolanauthoritieswereunabletoguaranteetheauthorssecurity ` shouldhereturntoAngolaandfileaclaim.UK.,US.,W(L   (CEUK.,UK.,CE.,jZ*25d dUUUU9:(#(#,UU,UU+  1' (  ( 1 Stateparty   (   ANGOLA 1' (  1 Case    RafaelMarquesde_Morais_Ԁ1128/2002 6,   6 Viewsadoptedon  @  29March2005 6,@   6 Issuesandviolations D  found  0    Theauthorsarrestanddetentionwereneitherreasonablenornecessarybut, D  atleastinpart,ofapunitivecharacterandthusarbitrary;hewasnot 0 informedofthereasonsforhisarrest;hewasbroughtbeforeajudgeonly  40daysafterhisarrestandremainedincommunicadofor10days.The  severityofthesanctionsimposedontheauthorcannotbeconsideredasa  proportionatemeasuretoprotectpublicorderorthehonourandthe  reputationofthePresidentand,therefore,therehadbeenaviolationof | article19.Theauthorspreventionfromleavingthecountryand h confiscationofhispassportwereinviolationofarticle12. ?5T  ? Remedy X recommended  D Aneffectiveremedy,includingcompensation. 6,X  6 DuedateforState  partyresponse   1July2005 6,   6 Statepartyresponse  H ! None 6,H "  6 Furtheraction  !L#   Duringtheeighty-fourthsessiontheSpecialRapporteurmetwitha !L$ representativeoftheStateparty,whoindicatedthattheStatehadlimited "8% capacitytodealwithallhumanrightsissuesbeforeit.Thatwasthereason #$& fornotreplyingtothecasesunderconsiderationbytheCommittee.He $ ' statedthathewouldrelaytheoutcomeofthismeetingtohiscapitaland % ( requestawrittenresponsetotheCommitteesViews.-#!&!)   -  $*t%+ USUK.,TRX3'LetterX3'Avery 12-294/295 Laser Ta3'LetterscapeX3'3'Letter2-294/295 Laser Ta@# T _CCPR_,A/61/40vol.I(2006)   ... t L  M  CHAPTERVIFOLLOW-UPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL L  227.InJuly1990,theCommitteeestablishedaprocedureforthemonitoringoffollow-uptoits $ t Viewsunderarticle5,paragraph4,oftheOptionalProtocol,andcreatedthemandateoftheSpecial  ` Rapporteurforfollow-uptoViewstothiseffect.Mr._Ando_ԀhasbeentheSpecialRapporteursince  L  March2001(seventy-firstsession).  8  228.In1991,theSpecialRapporteurbegantorequestfollow-upinformationfromStatesparties.   SuchinformationhasbeensystematicallyrequestedinrespectofallViewswithafindingofa   violationofCovenantrights;429Viewsoutofthe547Viewsadoptedsince1979concludedthat   therehadbeenaviolationoftheCovenant.   229.Allattemptstocategorizefollow-uprepliesbyStatespartiesareinherentlyimpreciseand \ subjective:itaccordinglyisnotpossibletoprovideaneatstatisticalbreakdownoffollow-upreplies. H Manyfollow-uprepliesreceivedmaybeconsideredsatisfactory,inthattheydisplaythewillingness 4 oftheStatepartytoimplementtheCommitteesrecommendationsortoofferthecomplainantan  p appropriateremedy.Otherrepliescannotbeconsideredsatisfactorybecausetheyeitherdonot  \ addresstheCommitteesViewsatalloronlyrelatetocertainaspectsofthem.Somerepliessimply H notethatthevictimhasfiledaclaimforcompensationoutsidestatutorydeadlinesandthatno 4 compensationcanthereforebepaid.Stillotherrepliesindicatethatthereisnolegalobligationon   theStatepartytoprovidearemedy,butthataremedywillbeaffordedtothecomplainantonanL  M  ex   gratiaL  M  Ԁbasis.  230.Theremainingfollow-upreplieschallengetheCommitteesViewsandfindingsonfactualor  legalgrounds,constitutemuch-belatedsubmissionsonthemeritsofthecomplaint,promisean l investigationofthematterconsideredbytheCommitteeorindicatethattheStatepartywillnot,for X  onereasonoranother,giveeffecttotheCommitteesViews. D! 231.Inmanycases,theSecretariathasalsoreceivedinformationfromcomplainantstotheeffect #l! thattheCommitteesViewshavenotbeenimplemented.Conversely,inrareinstances,thepetitioner $X" hasinformedtheCommitteethattheStatepartyhadinfactgiveneffecttotheCommittees $D # recommendations,eventhoughtheStatepartyhadnotitselfprovidedthatinformation. %0!$ 232.Thepresentannualreportadoptsthesameformatforthepresentationoffollow-upinformation '#& asthelastannualreport.Thetablebelowdisplaysacompletepictureoffollow-uprepliesfrom (#' Statespartiesreceivedupto7July2006,inrelationtoViewsinwhichtheCommitteefound )$( violationsoftheCovenant.Whereverpossible,itindicateswhetherfollow-uprepliesareorhave |*%) beenconsideredassatisfactoryorunsatisfactory,intermsoftheircompliancewiththeCommittees h+&* Views,orwhetherthedialoguebetweentheStatepartyandtheSpecialRapporteurforfollow-upto T,'+ Viewscontinues.TheNotesfollowinganumberofcaseentriesconveyanideaofthedifficulties @-(, incategorizingfollow-upreplies.  233.  Follow-upinformationprovidedbyStatespartiesandbypetitionersortheirrepresentatives  subsequenttothelastannualreport(A/60/40,vol.I,chap.VI)issetoutinannexVIItovolumeII t ofthepresentannualreport.  ` TRO'3Letter LandscapeX3'Letter'3Letter LandscapeX3'3'LetterscapeX3'TL  M  L  M  FOLLOW-UPRECEIVEDTODATEFORALLCASESOFVIOLATIONSOFTHECOVENANT   *;D<ddUUUU25..,dd ,dd , dd ,dd ,dd ,edd ,dd +  $hh $Stateparty  andnumber   ofcases   with   violation '   'L  M  L  M  Communication   number,authorand    location '   'L  M  L  M  Follow-upresponse   receivedfromStateparty   andlocation '  'L  M  L  M  Satisfactory  response '  'L  M  L  M  Unsatisfactory  response '  'L  M  L  M  No  follow-up   response   received '  'L  M  L  M  Follow-up  dialogue   ongoing '  '... 'V  ' 'V  ' 'V  ' 'V  ' 'V  ' 'V  ' "V ! "Angola(2) & " &L  M  L  M  711/1996,L  M  DiasL  M  Ԁ  # A/55/40L  M  L  M  L  M   v $ X  % A/61/40  v &    ' X  ( A/61/40  v )    * X   +    + 1128/2002,L  M  MarquesL  M   H , A/60/40  6- X H . A/61/40  6/   H 0 X H 1 A/61/40  62   H 3 X  H 4 ...  h5   h6   h7   h8   h9   h:  h;  UK.,US.,e  ; TRX3'LetterO'3Letter Landscape3'LetterH Remedyrecommended:Adequatemeasurestop'3Letter LandscapeX3'TCEUK., _CCPR_,A/61/40vol.II(2006)   ...  AnnexVII ` FOLLOW-UPOFTHEHUMANRIGHTSCOMMITTEEONINDIVIDUAL 8  COMMUNICATIONSUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOLTOTHEINTERNATIONAL $ t COVENANTONCIVILANDPOLITICALRIGHTS  ` ThisreportsetsoutallinformationprovidedbyStatespartiesandauthorsortheircounselsincethe  8  lastAnnualReport(A/60/40).  $   *=> dddd dd  dd dd dd edd edd ;D<(#(#,bUU,UU+  1'   1 Stateparty     ANGOLA 6,   6 Case  L  CarlosDiaz,711/1996 6,L  6 Viewsadoptedon  P  20March2000 6,P  6 Issuesand  violationsfound    Noseriousinvestigationofcrimescommittedbypersoninhighposition,  harassmentoftheauthorandwitnessessothattheycannotreturnto  Angola,lossofpropertyArticle9,paragraph1. ?5  ? Remedy @ recommended  ,|  Aneffectiveremedyandtotakeadequatemeasurestoprotecthispersonal @ securityfromthreatsofanykind. ?5,|  ? DuedateforState 0 partyresponse    17July2000 ?50   ? DateofState ! partysresponse  l "  12January2006 ?5#  ? Stateparty  "p$ response   #\%  TheCommitteewillrecallthattheStatepartyprovidednoinformationto  "p& theCommitteepriortoconsiderationofthiscase.  #\' TheStatepartysubmitsthattheOptionalProtocolcameintoforceon10 $4 ) April1992ratherthan9February1992asstatedinthecommunication. % !* Itprovidesdetailed_ratione_Ԁ_temporis_Ԁargumentsontheinadmissibilityof & "+ theclaimrelatingtothemurderofMs.Carolinade_Ftima_ԀdaSilva '", Francisco.TheCommitteewillrecallthatthisclaimwasfoundtobe (#- inadmissible. )$. AstotheclaimonthebasisofwhichtheCommitteefoundaviolationof X+&0 article9,theStatepartysubmitsthattheauthordidnotexhaustdomestic D,'1 remediesandthatthereforethisclaimshouldhavebeenconsidered  inadmissible.Itsubmitsthatitisnotclearfromtheauthorwhoisalleged  tohavethreatenedhim!thegovernmentofAngolaortheperpetratorsof  thecrimeandiftheauthor,whenfacedwithsaidthreatsorfear, t requestedtheprotectionofthecompetentgovernmentauthoritiesand ` personalsafetypursuanttolegalrequirements. ?5L   ?   P  Accordingtoarticles20and22oftheAngolanConstitutionallaw,the  P personalandphysicalintegrityofanycitizen,includingforeigners,is  <  protectedbylaw.TheStatepartyhasstructuresinplacetoprovidethese  (  services,makepoliceavailableifitisconsideredappropriate,orplace    underpolicecustodyindividualswhothreatenorintimidateothers.   AstotheprohibitionoftheauthortoenterAngola,theStatepartysubmits   thatMr.Diaslikeanyotherforeigncitizenmaypresenthimselftoany t  ConsularrepresentativeofAngola,presentthedocumentsrequiredbylaw `  andapplyforanentryvisa,whichwillthenbeconsideredwithinthe L requirementsofthelaw.TheStatepartyrequeststheCommitteeto 8 reconsiderthiscase. ?5$t  ? Authorsresponse  ( TheStatepartysresponsewasforwardedon1March2006totheauthor ( forcommentbutwasreturnedunopened. ?5  ? Committees x Decision  d  TheCommitteerecallsthatduringtheeightysecondand x eighty-fourthsessions,theSpecialRapporteurmetwithrepresentativesof d theStateparty,whoprovidedthesameargumentschallengingthe P Committeesdecisionsasthoseabove. < TheCommitteeregardstheStatepartysresponseasunsatisfactoryand d considersthefollowupdialogueongoing. ?5P  ? Case      RafaelMarquesde_Morais_Ԁ1128/2002 ?5 !  ? Viewsadoptedon  h""  29March2005 ?5h"#  ? Issuesand $l$ violationsfound  %X %  Arbitraryarrestanddetention,travelconstraintsandrestrictedrightto $l& freedomofexpressionwithrespecttocommentsmadeagainstthe %X ' PresidentArticles9,paragraphs1,2,3,4,andarticles12,and19. ?5%D!(  ? Remedy '") recommended  (#*  Inaccordancewitharticle2,paragraph3,oftheCovenant,theauthoris '"+ entitledtoaneffectiveremedy,includingcompensationforhisarbitrary (#, arrestanddetention,aswellasfortheviolationsofhisrightsunder )$- articles12and19oftheCovenant.TheStatepartyisunderanobligation l*%. totakemeasurestopreventsimilarviolationsinthefuture. ?5X+&/  ? DuedateforState  -\(0 partyresponse A7  @38533@A 1July2005  -\(  aW? @38533  @ a DateofState d partysresponse A7 P @38736@AUK.,CE.,ۄ20January2006 d CEUK.,OECP @38736   @ O *p?@ ddbUUbUU=>(#(#p,bUU,UU+  1' T T 1UK.,CE., Stateparty  T response   @    TheStatepartyrefersonlytotheauthorsargumentinparagraph2.14of  T theViewsontheissueoftheAmnestyLaw7/00,of15December2000.  @  Theauthorhadcomplainedthatregardlessofthisamnesty,hewas  ,  summonedtotheProvincialCourtandorderedtopaycompensationof    _Nkz_.30,000tothePresident,whichherefusedtopay,andlegalcosts,for    whichhepaid.TheStatepartyarguesthatthelawdoesnotcovercivil    liabilityresultingfromamnestiedcrimesandthattheauthoristhus   obligedtopaycompensationtothePresidentassetoutintheSupreme x  CourtAppeal.AccordingtotheStateparty, thebasisofthecase d  presentedtotheHighCommissionerforHumanRightsoftheUnited P  Nationswasthereforeunfounded. <  TheStatepartyalsotranscribesthejudgementoftheSupremeCourtin d thiscaseandrequeststheCommitteetoreviseitsdecision. ?5P  ? Authorsresponse    On1May2006,theauthorscounselcommentedontotheStatepartys  response.TheysubmitthattheStatepartyessentiallyreproducesthe  decisionoftheSupremeCourt(whichwasalreadyincludedinthefile  consideredbytheCommittee)andthensummarilyrequeststhe x Committeetoconsiderthecaseinadmissible.Inlightofthefactthatthe d Statepartyfailedtorespondtoanyrequestsforinformationfromthe P Committeepriortoconsiderationofthiscase,sucharequestatthisstage < isconsidereddisrespectful.TheStatepartyfailstoaddressthe (x Committeesconclusionsandshouldberemindedofitsobligationsto d cooperatewiththeCommittee.TheyrequesttheCommitteetocontinue P  torequestinformationfromtheStatepartyandsuggestthefollowing <! possibleremedies:thepublicationofanapology;quashingofhiscriminal  (" convictionandlegaleffects;adequatemonetarycompensation;the !# adoptionofaseriesoflegislativeandadministrativemeasurestobringits "$ lawandpracticesrelevanttofreedomofexpressionanddueprocessrights #% inlinewiththerequirementsofinternationallaw. ?5$&  ? Committees <&!' Decision  ('x"(  TheStatepartyhasfailedtoaddresstheviolationsfoundorevento <&!) acknowledgetheCommitteesfindings.Itmerelyreferstotheauthors ('x"* obligationunderdomesticlegislationwithoutacknowledgingthatthe (d#+ Committeefound,interalia,aviolationofarticle19inthiscaseforthe )P$, restrictionoftheauthorsfreedomofexpressionwithrespecttohis )<%- criticismofthePresident.CEUK.,-#!*(&.   -UK.,CE.,t  ,'.  _CCPR_,A/62/40vol.I(2007)   ... t CHAPTERVI.FOLLOW-UPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL L  213.  InJuly1990,theCommitteeestablishedaprocedureforthemonitoringoffollow-uptoits $ t Viewsunderarticle5,paragraph4,oftheOptionalProtocol,andcreatedthemandateoftheSpecial  ` Rapporteurforfollow-uptoViewstothiseffect.Mr.AndohasbeentheSpecialRapporteursince  L  March2001(seventy-firstsession).  8  214.  In1991,theSpecialRapporteurbegantorequestfollow-upinformationfromStatesparties.   SuchinformationhasbeensystematicallyrequestedinrespectofallViewswithafindingofa   violationofCovenantrights;452Viewsoutofthe570Viewsadoptedsince1979concludedthat   therehadbeenaviolationoftheCovenant.   215.  Allattemptstocategorizefollow-uprepliesbyStatespartiesareinherentlyimpreciseand \ subjective:itaccordinglyisnotpossibletoprovideaneatstatisticalbreakdownoffollow-upreplies. H Manyfollow-uprepliesreceivedmaybeconsideredsatisfactory,inthattheydisplaythewillingness 4 oftheStatepartytoimplementtheCommitteesrecommendationsortoofferthecomplainantan  p appropriateremedy.Otherrepliescannotbeconsideredsatisfactorybecausetheyeitherdonot  \ addresstheCommitteesViewsatalloronlyrelatetocertainaspectsofthem.Somerepliessimply H notethatthevictimhasfiledaclaimforcompensationoutsidestatutorydeadlinesandthatno 4 compensationcanthereforebepaid.Stillotherrepliesindicatethatthereisnolegalobligationon   theStatepartytoprovidearemedy,butthataremedywillbeaffordedtothecomplainantonanex   gratiabasis.  216.  Theremainingfollow-upreplieschallengetheCommitteesViewsandfindingsonfactual  orlegalgrounds,constitutemuch-belatedsubmissionsonthemeritsofthecomplaint,promisean l investigationofthematterconsideredbytheCommitteeorindicatethattheStatepartywillnot,for X  onereasonoranother,giveeffecttotheCommitteesViews. D! 217.  Inmanycases,theCommitteesecretariathasalsoreceivedinformationfromcomplainants #l! totheeffectthattheCommitteesViewshavenotbeenimplemented.Conversely,inrareinstances, $X" thepetitionerhasinformedtheCommitteethattheStatepartyhadinfactgiveneffecttothe $D # Committeesrecommendations,eventhoughtheStatepartyhadnotitselfprovidedthatinformation. %0!$ 218.  Thepresentannualreportadoptsthesameformatforthepresentationoffollow-up '#& informationasthelastannualreport.Thetablebelowdisplaysacompletepictureoffollow-up (#' repliesfromStatespartiesreceivedupto7July2007,inrelationtoViewsinwhichtheCommittee )$( foundviolationsoftheCovenant.Whereverpossible,itindicateswhetherfollow-uprepliesareor |*%) havebeenconsideredassatisfactoryorunsatisfactory,intermsoftheircompliancewiththe h+&* CommitteesViews,orwhetherthedialoguebetweentheStatepartyandtheSpecialRapporteurfor T,'+ follow-uptoViewscontinues.TheNotesfollowinganumberofcaseentriesconveyanideaofthe @-(, difficultiesincategorizingfollow-upreplies.  219.  Follow-upinformationprovidedbyStatespartiesandbypetitionersortheirrepresentatives  subsequenttothelastannualreport(A/61/40,vol.I,chap.VI)issetoutinannexVIItovolumeII t ofthepresentannualreport. `   8  TRO'3Letter LandscapeX3'Letter'3Letter Landscape   CHAPTERVI. 3'LetterH Remedyrecommended:AdequatemeasurestopT  FOLLOW-UPRECEIVEDTODATEFORALLCASESOFVIOLATIONSOFTHECOVENANT   *ABddbUUbUU?@..,/\R,\R,\R,\R,\R,f\R,\\+  8DDD'  8Statepartyand  numberofcases  withviolation =DDD,!rDDD =Communication  number,  authorandlocation =DDD,!rDDD =Follow-upresponse   receivedfromState   partyandlocation =DDD,!r DDD =Satisfactory   response =DDD,! DDD =Unsatisfactory  response =DDD,!DDD =Nofollow-up  response  received ?DDDD,!rDDD ?Follow-up  dialogue  ongoing XDDG,r  DDDD  X... @DD/!t DD @ @DD/!t DD @ @DD/!t DD @ @DD/!t DD @ @DD/!t DD @ BDDD/!t DD B YDDH,t   DDD YAngola(2) EDD4)l ||PDD E711/1996,Dias l  A/55/40 4DD#Z DD 4X l   A/61/40 4DD#Z !DD 4 4DD#l "DD 4X l # A/61/40 4DD#Z $DD 4 6DDD#l %DD 6X ;1l & DDD ; (DD R & (1128/2002,Marques R ' A/60/40 4DD#@ (DD 4X R ) A/61/40 4DD#@ *DD 4 4DD#R +DD 4X R , A/61/40 4DD#@ -DD 4 6DDD#R .DD 6X 9DD(R / DDD 9... +DD8 0DD + +DD8 1DD + +DD8 2DD + +DD8 3DD + +DD8 4DD + -DDD8 5DD -.$"8 6  DDD .  0 6 TRX3'LetterO'3Letter Landscape3'Letter  M  Ԁ  # A/55/40L  '3Letter Landscape   CHAPTERVI. T _CCPR_,A/63/40vol.I(2008)    VI.  FOLLOW-UPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL  t 187.  InJuly1990,theCommitteeestablishedaprocedureforthemonitoringoffollow-uptoits L  Viewsunderarticle5,paragraph4,oftheOptionalProtocol,andcreatedthemandateoftheSpecial 8  Rapporteurforfollow-uptoViewstothiseffect.Mr.AndohasbeentheSpecialRapporteursince $ t March2001(seventy-firstsession).  ` 188.  In1991,theSpecialRapporteurbegantorequestfollow-upinformationfromStatesparties.  8  SuchinformationhadbeensystematicallyrequestedinrespectofallViewswithafindingofa $  violationofCovenantrights;429Viewsoutofthe547Viewsadoptedsince1979concludedthat   therehadbeenaviolationoftheCovenant.   189.  Allattemptstocategorizefollow-uprepliesbyStatespartiesareinherentlyimpreciseand   subjective:itaccordinglyisnotpossibletoprovideaneatstatisticalbreakdownoffollow-upreplies. p Manyfollow-uprepliesreceivedmaybeconsideredsatisfactory,inthattheydisplaythewillingness \ oftheStatepartytoimplementtheCommittee'srecommendationsortoofferthecomplainantan H appropriateremedy.Otherrepliescannotbeconsideredsatisfactorybecausetheyeitherdonot 4 addresstheCommittee'sViewsatallorrelateonlytocertainaspectsofthem.Somerepliessimply  p notethatthevictimhasfiledaclaimforcompensationoutsidestatutorydeadlinesandthatno  \ compensationcanthereforebepaid.Stillotherrepliesindicatethatthereisnolegalobligationon H theStatepartytoprovidearemedy,butthataremedywillbeaffordedtothecomplainantonanex 4 gratiabasis.   190.  Theremainingfollow-upreplieschallengetheCommittee'sViewsandfindingsonfactual  orlegalgrounds,constitutemuch-belatedsubmissionsonthemeritsofthecomplaint,promisean  investigationofthematterconsideredbytheCommitteeorindicatethattheStatepartywillnot,for  onereasonoranother,giveeffecttotheCommittee'srecommendations. l 191.  Inmanycases,theSecretariathasalsoreceivedinformationfromcomplainantstotheeffect D! thattheCommittee'sViewshavenotbeenimplemented.Conversely,inrareinstances,thepetitioner 0"  hasinformedtheCommitteethattheStatepartyhadinfactgiveneffecttotheCommittee's #l! recommendations,eventhoughtheStatepartyhadnotitselfprovidedthatinformation. $X" 192.  Thepresentannualreportadoptsthesameformatforthepresentationoffollow-up %0!$ informationasthelastannualreport.Thetablebelowdisplaysacompletepictureoffollow-up &"% repliesfromStatespartiesreceivedupto7July2008,inrelationtoViewsinwhichtheCommittee '#& foundviolationsoftheCovenant.Whereverpossible,itindicateswhetherfollow-uprepliesareor (#' havebeenconsideredassatisfactoryorunsatisfactory,intermsoftheircompliancewiththe )$( Committee'sViews,orwhetherthedialoguebetweentheStatepartyandtheSpecialRapporteurfor |*%) follow-uptoViewscontinues.Thenotesfollowinganumberofcaseentriesconveyanideaofthe h+&* difficultiesincategorizingfollow-upreplies. T,'+ _ @-(, 193.  Follow-upinformationprovidedbyStatespartiesandbypetitionersortheirrepresentatives  subsequenttothelastannualreport(A/62/40)issetoutinannexVIItovolumeIIofthepresent  annualreport.    t _TRO'3Letter LandscapeX3'Letter'3Letter LandscapeL  M  Issuesandviol3'Letter  M  Ԁ  # A/55/40L  T*FGVdd/\R/\R\R\R\Rf\Rf\\AB..,vv, vv,Svv,vv,vv,vv,:vv+  /DDD GG/L  M  L  M  Statepartyandnumber G ofcaseswithviolation +DDD5DDD +Communicationnumber, G authorandrelevant 5 Committeereport +DDD#DDD +Followupresponse G receivedfromState 5 party +DDD#DDD +Satisfactory G  response +DDD5 DDD +Unsatisfactory G  response +DDD5 DDD +No G  response -DDDD5DDD -Followup G dialogue 5 ongoingL  M  AD2## GG  DDDD GGA... +DDOD + +DDODD + +DDODD + +DDODD + +DDODD + -DDDODD - ADD2#O GG  DDD GGAL  M  Angola(2) +DD DD +711/1996,L  M  DiasL  M     A/55/40L  M  +DD DD +X   A/61/40 +DD DD + +DD DD +X   A/61/40 +DD  DD + -DDD !DD -L  M  XL  M  L  M  CDD2# " GG  DDD GGCL  M  +DD5 #DD +1128/2002,L  M  MarquesL  M   5 $ A/60/40L  M  +DD# s%DD +X 5 & A/61/40 +DD# s'DD + +DD5 (DD +X 5 ) A/61/40 +DD# s*DD + -DDD5 +DD -L  M  XL  M  L  M  CDD2#5 , GG  DDD GGC... +DD -DD + +DD .DD + +DD /DD + +DD 0DD + +DD 1DD + -DDD 2DD -3)' 3 GG   DDD 3  $ 3 TRX3'LetterO'3Letter Landscape3'Letter@A 1July2005  -\(  a'3Letter LandscapeL  M  IssuesandviolT _CCPR_,A/64/40,vol.I(2009)    VI.  FOLLOWUPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL  t 230.  InJuly1990,theCommitteeestablishedaprocedureforthemonitoringoffollow-uptoits L  Viewsunderarticle5,paragraph4,oftheOptionalProtocol,andcreatedthemandateoftheSpecial 8  Rapporteurforfollow-uponViewstothiseffect.Ms.RuthWedgwoodhasbeentheSpecial $ t RapporteursinceJuly2009(ninety-sixthsession).  ` 231.  In1991,theSpecialRapporteurbegantorequestfollow-upinformationfromStatesparties.  8  SuchinformationhadbeensystematicallyrequestedinrespectofallViewswithafindingofa $  violationofCovenantrights;543Viewsoutofthe681Viewsadoptedsince1979concludedthat   therehadbeenaviolationoftheCovenant.   232.  Allattemptstocategorizefollow-uprepliesbyStatespartiesareinherentlyimpreciseand   subjective:itaccordinglyisnotpossibletoprovideaneatstatisticalbreakdownoffollow-upreplies. p Manyfollow-uprepliesreceivedmaybeconsideredsatisfactory,inthattheydisplaythewillingness \ oftheStatepartytoimplementtheCommittee'srecommendationsortoofferthecomplainantan H appropriateremedy.Otherrepliescannotbeconsideredsatisfactorybecausetheyeitherdonot 4 addresstheCommittee'sViewsatallorrelateonlytocertainaspectsofthem.Somerepliessimply  p notethatthevictimhasfiledaclaimforcompensationoutsidestatutorydeadlinesandthatno  \ compensationcanthereforebepaid.Stillotherrepliesindicatethatthereisnolegalobligationon H theStatepartytoprovidearemedy,butthataremedywillbeaffordedtothecomplainantonanex 4 gratiabasis.   233.  Theremainingfollow-upreplieschallengetheCommittee'sViewsandfindingsonfactual  orlegalgrounds,constitutemuchbelatedsubmissionsonthemeritsofthecomplaint,promisean  investigationofthematterconsideredbytheCommitteeorindicatethattheStatepartywillnot,for  onereasonoranother,giveeffecttotheCommittee'srecommendations. l 234.  Inmanycases,theSecretariathasalsoreceivedinformationfromcomplainantstotheeffect D! thattheCommittee'sViewshavenotbeenimplemented.Conversely,inrareinstances,thepetitioner 0"  hasinformedtheCommitteethattheStatepartyhadinfactgiveneffecttotheCommittee's #l! recommendations,eventhoughtheStatepartyhadnotitselfprovidedthatinformation. $X" 235.  Thepresentannualreportadoptsthesameformatforthepresentationoffollow-up %0!$ informationasthelastannualreport.Thetablebelowdisplaysacompletepictureoffollow-up &"% repliesfromStatespartiesreceiveduptotheninety-sixthsession(13-31July2009),inrelationto '#& ViewsinwhichtheCommitteefoundviolationsoftheCovenant.Whereverpossible,itindicates (#' whetherfollow-uprepliesareorhavebeenconsideredassatisfactoryorunsatisfactory,intermsof )$( theircompliancewiththeCommittee'sViews,orwhetherthedialoguebetweentheStatepartyand |*%) theSpecialRapporteurforfollow-uponViewscontinues.Thenotesfollowinganumberofcase h+&* entriesconveyanideaofthedifficultiesincategorizingfollow-upreplies. T,'+ _ @-(, 236.  Follow-upinformationprovidedbyStatespartiesandbypetitionersortheirrepresentatives  subsequenttothelastannualreport(A/63/40)issetoutinannexIXtovolumeIIofthepresent  annualreport.    L  TRO'3Letter LandscapeX3'Letter'3Letter Landscape 1July2005  -\(  a3'Letter@A 1July2005  -\(  aTIX*CE[dVdvv vv SvvSvvvvvv:vv:FG..,vv,) vv,vv,vv,vv,#vv,vv+  /DDD vv/L  M  L  M  Statepartyandnumber d ofcaseswithviolation +DDDRDDD +CommunicationnumberL  M  ,L  M   d authorandrelevant R Committeereport +DDD@DDD +Followup d responsereceived R fromStateparty +DDD@ DDD +Satisfactory d  response +DDDR DDD +Unsatisfactory d  response +DDDR DDD +No d response -DDDDRDDD -Follow d up R dialogue @ ongoingL  M  CDD2#. vv  DDDD vvCL  M  ... +DD DD + +DD DD + +DD DD + +DD DD + +DD DD + -DDD DD - AD2#  vv  DDD vvAL  M  Angola(2) +DD D +711/1996L  M  ,L  M  Dias   L  M  A/55/40L  M  +DD DD +X   A/61/40 +DD DD + +DD  DD +X  ! A/61/40 +DD "DD + -DDD #DD -L  M  XL  M  L  M  CDD2# $ vv  DDD vvCL  M  +DDZ %DD +1128/2002L  M  ,L  M  Marques Z & L  M  A/60/40L  M  +DDH 'DD +X Z ( A/61/40 +DDH )DD + +DDZ *DD +X Z + A/61/40 +DDH ,DD + -DDDZ -DD -L  M  XL  M  L  M  CDD2#Z . vv  DDD vvC... +DD"r /DD + +DD"r 0DD + +DD"r 1DD + +DD"r 2DD + +DD"r 3DD + -DDD"r 4DD -3)'"r 5 vv   DDD 3