WPC 1noFHu/§̹[3__,{*.J'zO)ݏgTj#tgMٻ;-wRӦP<[qK]}K䜿} Ҧͬ[Zv2= [%, LheX}ѻVTk*.Kqft)L)PHC|0wOgϰY){2[_)h)[OIo3u+DeJ36^~n4hs]Bun28Zjwe3>:Z-k׉W2o"lhS48W?Pw ydS)wae]PjqaEwd$tkD5͐XZɬF@ng`'ij|gTՋj0@L YMWg*5(' V[8YcO$d&3 )xFfojK4l# UNw % 0:^ w4)8 m:NQfSaU 1ui 72 B7f-a/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// DEC B- 0c 0w 0 0 0 0m 04 0 0D 1uBHP Officejet 6500 E710n-z (Network)0(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularX(\$CEUS.,.> >ntFold3|xU Table_L3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)i)  d Table_L9Hairline!dxdx)Hairline d(;3$2#  0  .3  0  (O;$0  2#  a  .3  0` (#(#(b$0  0` (#(#2#   .3  0 ` (#` (#(xir$0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#2#(  0  )3  0 (# (#($0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#2#(  a  )3  0h(#(#(F$0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#0h(#(#2#(   )3  0h(#h(#($0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#0h(#(#0h(#h(#2#  0  )3  0(#(#({$0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#0h(#(#0h(#h(#0(#(#2#  a  )3  0p(#(#(F$0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#0h(#(#0h(#h(#0(#(#0p(#(#2#     )3  0p(#p(# y13MQUY]aeiBullets List \!CEUS.,  _  pXXUSCE.,BELGIUM#XdXpL#  =Follow-up-StateReporting  Ѐ_i_)ActionbyTreatyBodies   CE.,US.,k CAT,A/64/44(2009)  t     IV.  FOLLOWUPONCONCLUDINGOBSERVATIONSONSTATESPARTIES L  REPORTS  8  53.  Inthischapter,theCommitteeupdatesitsfindingsandactivitiesthatfollow-uptoconcluding `  observationsadoptedunderarticle19oftheConvention,inaccordancewiththerecommendations L  ofitsRapporteuronfollow-uptoconcludingobservations.TheRapporteur'sactivities,responses 8  byStatesparties,andtheRapporteur'sviewsonrecurringconcernsencounteredthroughthis $  procedurearepresentedbelow,andupdatedthrough15May2009,followingtheCommittee's   forty-secondsession.   54.  InchapterIVofitsannualreportfor2005-2006(A/61/44),theCommitteedescribedthe  frameworkthatithaddevelopedtoprovideforfollow-upsubsequenttotheadoptionofthe p concludingobservationsonStatespartiesreportssubmittedunderarticle19oftheConvention.It \ alsopresentedinformationontheCommittee'sexperienceinreceivinginformationfromStates H partiesfromtheinitiationoftheprocedureinMay2003throughMay2009. 4 55.  Inaccordancewithrule68,paragraph2,oftherulesofprocedure,theCommitteeestablished  \ thepostofRapporteurforfollowuptoconcludingobservationsunderarticle19oftheConvention H andappointedMs.Felice_Gaer_Ԁtothatposition.Asinthepast,Ms._Gaer_Ԁpresentedaprogressreport 4 totheCommitteeinMay2009ontheresultsoftheprocedure.   56.  TheRapporteurhasemphasizedthatthefollowupprocedureaims"tomakemoreeffective  thestruggleagainsttortureandothercruel,inhumananddegradingtreatmentorpunishment",as  articulatedinthepreambletotheConvention.AttheconclusionoftheCommittee'sreviewofeach   Statepartyreport,theCommitteeidentifiesconcernsandrecommendsspecificactionsdesignedto l! enhanceeachStateparty'sabilitytoimplementthemeasuresnecessaryandappropriatetoprevent X"  actsoftortureandill-treatment,andtherebyassistsStatespartiesinbringingtheirlawandpractice D#! intofullcompliancewiththeobligationssetforthintheConvention. 0$" 57.  Initsfollow-upprocedure,theCommitteehasidentifiedanumberoftheserecommendations &X!$ asrequiringadditionalinformationspecificallyforthisprocedure.Suchfollow-uprecommendations &D"% areidentifiedbecausetheyareserious,protective,andareconsideredabletobeaccomplishedwithin '0#& oneyear.TheStatespartiesareaskedtoprovidewithinoneyearinformationonthemeasurestaken ($' togiveeffecttoitsfollow-uprecommendationswhicharespecificallynotedinaparagraphnearthe )%( endoftheconclusionsandrecommendationsonthereviewoftheStatesparties'reportsunderarticle *%) 19. +&* 58.  SincetheprocedurewasestablishedatthethirtiethsessioninMay2003,throughtheendof h-(, _theforty-secondsessioninMay2009,theCommitteehasreviewed81Statesforwhichithas  identifiedfollowuprecommendations.Ofthe67Statespartiesthatwereduetohavesubmittedtheir  followupreportstotheCommitteeby15May2009,44hadcompletedthisrequirement.Asof15  May2009,23Stateshadnotyetsuppliedfollowupinformationthathadfallendue.TheRapporteur t sendsremindersrequestingtheoutstandinginformationtoeachoftheStateswhosefollowup ` informationwasdue,buthadnotyetbeensubmitted,andwhohadnotpreviouslybeensenta L  reminder.Thestatusofthefollow-uptoconcludingobservationsmaybefoundinthewebpagesof 8  theCommittee(http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cat/sessions.htm). $ t 59.  TheRapporteurnotedthat14followupreportshadfallenduesincethepreviousannual  L  report.However,only4(Algeria,Estonia,PortugalandUzbekistan)ofthese14Stateshadsubmitted  8  thefollowupinformationinatimelymanner.Despitethis,sheexpressedtheviewthatthefollow $  upprocedurehadbeenremarkablysuccessfulinelicitingvaluableadditionalinformationfromStates   onprotectivemeasurestakenduringtheimmediatefollowuptothereviewoftheperiodicreports.   OneStateparty(Montenegro)hadalreadysubmittedinformationwhichwasdueonlyinNovember   2009.WhilecomparativelyfewStateshadrepliedpreciselyontime,34ofthe44respondentshad   submittedtheinformationontimeorwithinamatterofonetofourmonthsfollowingtheduedate. p Remindersseemedtohelpelicitmanyoftheseresponses.TheRapporteuralsoexpressed \ appreciationtonongovernmentalorganizations,manyofwhomhadalsoencouragedStatesparties H tosubmitfollowupinformationinatimelyway. 4 60.  Throughthisprocedure,theCommitteeseekstoadvancetheConvention'srequirementthat  \ "eachStatepartyshalltakeeffectivelegislative,administrative,judicialorothermeasurestoprevent H actsoftorture8"(art.2,para.1)andtheundertaking"toprevent8otheractsofcruel,inhuman 4 anddegradingtreatmentorpunishment8"(art.16).   61.  TheRapporteurexpressedappreciationfortheinformationprovidedbyStatesparties  regardingthosemeasurestakentoimplementtheirobligationsundertheConvention.Inaddition,  shehasassessedtheresponsesreceivedastowhetheralltheitemsdesignatedbytheCommitteefor  followup(normallybetweenthreeandsixrecommendations)havebeenaddressed,whetherthe l informationprovidedrespondstotheCommittee'sconcern,andwhetherfurtherinformationis X  required.EachletterrespondsspecificallyandindetailtotheinformationpresentedbytheState D! party.Wherefurtherinformationhasbeenneeded,shehaswrittentotheconcernedStatepartywith 0"  specificrequestsforfurtherclarification.WithregardtoStatesthathavenotsuppliedthefollowup #l! informationatall,sherequeststheoutstandinginformation. $X" 62.  AtitsthirtyeighthsessioninMay2007,theCommitteedecidedtomakepublicthe %0!$ Rapporteur'sletterstotheStatesparties.ThesewouldbeplacedonthewebpageoftheCommittee. &"% TheCommitteefurtherdecidedtoassignaUnitedNationsdocumentsymbolnumbertoallStates '#& parties'repliestothefollowupandalsoplacethemonitswebsite (#' (http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cat/sessions.htm). )$( 63.  SincetherecommendationstoeachStatepartyarecraftedtoreflectthespecificsituationin h+&* thatcountry,thefollowupresponsesfromtheStatespartiesandlettersfromtheRapporteur T,'+ requestingfurtherclarificationaddressawidearrayoftopics.Amongthoseaddressedinthe_letters @-(, senttoStatespartiesrequestingfurtherinformationhavebeenanumberofprecisemattersseenas  essentialtotheimplementationoftherecommendationinquestion.Anumberofissueshavebeen  highlightedtoreflectnotonlytheinformationprovided,butalsotheissuesthathavenotbeen  addressedbutwhicharedeemedessentialtotheCommittee'songoingwork,inordertobeeffective t intakingpreventiveandprotectivemeasurestoeliminatetortureandilltreatment. ` ... L  65.  Thechartbelowdetails,asof15May2009,theendoftheCommittee'sforty-secondsession, 8  thestateofthereplieswithrespecttofollowup. $ t  Follow-upproceduretoconclusionsandrecommendationsfromMay2003toMay2009   L   ...  $   Fortyfirstsession(November2008)    *PQ Vddd Xdd Xdd X(#(#,vv,vv,` vv,vv+  8***'   vv8L  M  L  M  Stateparty =***,!^ "*** =Information ^  duein =***,!J"*** =Informationreceived ?****,!^ "*** ?Actiontaken L  M  J*;,^ " vv  **** vvJL  M  Belgium )*"* )November2009 2*#"* 2L  M  Ԅ 6**#!""* 6L  M  L  M  C**2#" vv  ** vvC... +**** + 4**#** 4 6***#!"** 63)' vv   *** 3L  M  L  ... H M     _USCE.,  CAT,A/65/44(2010)    ChapterIV.FollowuptoconcludingobservationsL  M  ԀonStatespartiesreports L  M   t L  M  L  M  65.Inthischapter,theCommitteeupdatesitsfindingsandactivitiesthatconstitutefollowupto L  concludingobservationsadoptedunderarticle19oftheConvention,inaccordancewiththe 8  procedureestablishedonfollowuptoconcludingobservations.ThefollowupresponsesbyStates $ t parties,andtheactivitiesoftheRapporteurforfollowuptoconcludingobservationsunderarticle  ` 19oftheConvention,includingtheRapporteursviewsontheresultsofthisprocedure,are  L  presentedbelow.Thisinformationisupdatedthrough14May2010,theendoftheCommittees  8  fortyfourthsession. $  66.InchapterIVofitsannualreportfor20052006(A/61/44),theCommitteedescribedthe   frameworkthatithaddevelopedtoprovideforfollowupsubsequenttotheadoptionofthe   concludingobservationsonStatespartiesreportssubmittedunderarticle19oftheConvention.In   thatreportandeachyearthereafter,theCommitteehaspresentedinformationonitsexperiencein p receivinginformationonfollowupmeasurestakenbyStatespartiessincetheinitiationofthe \ procedureinMay2003. H 67.Inaccordancewithrule68,paragraph2,oftherulesofprocedure,theCommitteeestablished  p thepostofRapporteurforfollowuptoconcludingobservationsunderarticle19oftheConvention  \ andappointedMs.FeliceGaertothatposition.InNovember2009andMay2010,theRapporteur H presentedaprogressreporttotheCommitteeontheresultsoftheprocedure. 4 68.AttheconclusionoftheCommitteesreviewofeachStatepartyreport,theCommitteeidentifies   concernsandrecommendsspecificmeasurestopreventactsoftortureandilltreatment.Thereby,  theCommitteeassistsStatespartiesinidentifyingeffectivelegislative,judicial,administrativeand  othermeasurestobringtheirlawsandpracticeintofullcompliancewiththeobligationssetforthin  theConvention. l 69.Initsfollowupprocedure,theCommitteehasidentifiedanumberoftheserecommendations D! asrequiringadditionalinformationwithinoneyear.Suchfollowuprecommendationsareidentified 0"  becausetheyareserious,protectiveandareconsideredabletobeaccomplishedwithinoneyear.The #l! Statespartiesareaskedtoprovideinformationwithinoneyearonthemeasurestakentogiveeffect $X" tothefollowuprecommendations.IntheconcludingobservationsoneachStatepartyreport,the $D # recommendationsrequiringfollowupwithinoneyeararespecificallyidentifiedinaparagraphat %0!$ theendoftheconcludingobservations. &"% 70.SincetheprocedurewasestablishedatthethirtiethsessioninMay2003,throughtheendofthe (#' fortyfourthsessioninMay2010,theCommitteehasreviewed95reportsfromStatespartiesfor )$( whichithasidentifiedfollowuprecommendations.ItmustbenotedthatperiodicreportsofChile, |*%) Latvia,LithuaniaandNewZealandhavebeenexaminedtwicebytheCommitteesincethe h+&* establishmentofthefollowupprocedure.Ofthe81Statespartiesthatwereduetohavesubmitted T,'+ theirfollowupreportstotheCommitteeby14May2010,57hadcompletedthisrequirement.As @-(, of14May2010,24Stateshadnotyetsuppliedfollowupinformationthathadfallendue:Republic  ofMoldova,Cambodia,Cameroon,Bulgaria,Uganda,DemocraticRepublicoftheCongo,Peru,  Togo,Burundi,SouthAfrica,Tajikistan,Luxembourg,Benin,CostaRica,Indonesia,Zambia,  Lithuania(tothe2009concludingobservations),Chad,Chile,Honduras,Israel,NewZealand, t NicaraguaandthePhilippines. ` 71.TheRapporteursendsremindersrequestingtheoutstandinginformationtoeachoftheStates 8  forwhichfollowupinformationisdue,butnotyetsubmitted.Thestatusofthefollowupto $ t concludingobservationsmaybefoundinthewebpagesoftheCommitteeateachoftherespective  ` sessions.Asof2010,theCommitteehasestablishedaseparatewebpageforfollowup  L  (http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cat/followprocedure.htm).  8  72.  Ofthe24Statespartiesthatdidnotsubmitanyinformationunderthefollowupprocedure   asof14May2010,nonrespondentscamefromallworldregions.Whileaboutonethirdhad   reportedforthefirsttime,twothirdswerereportingforasecond,thirdorevenfourthtime.   73.TheRapporteurexpressesappreciationfortheinformationprovidedbyStatespartiesregarding p thosemeasurestakentoimplementtheirobligationsundertheConvention.Inaddition,shehas \ assessedtheresponsesreceivedastowhetheralltheitemsdesignatedbytheCommitteeforfollow H up(normallybetweenthreeandsixrecommendations)havebeenaddressed,whethertheinformation 4 providedrespondstotheCommitteesconcern,andwhetherfurtherinformationisrequired.Each  p letterrespondsspecificallyandindetailtotheinformationpresentedbytheStateparty.Where  \ furtherinformationhasbeenneeded,shehaswrittentotheconcernedStatepartywithspecific H requestsforfurtherclarification.WithregardtoStatesthathavenotsuppliedthefollowup 4 informationatall,sherequeststheoutstandinginformation.   74.AtitsthirtyeighthsessioninMay2007,theCommitteedecidedtomakepublictheRapporteurs  letterstotheStatespartieswhicharepostedonthewebpageoftheCommittee.TheCommittee  furtherdecidedtoassignaUnitedNationsdocumentsymbolnumbertoallStatespartiesrepliesto  thefollowupandalsoplacethemonitswebsite. l 75.SincetherecommendationstoeachStatepartyarecraftedtoreflectthespecificsituationinthat D! country,thefollowupresponsesfromtheStatespartiesandlettersfromtheRapporteurrequesting 0"  furtherclarificationaddressawidearrayoftopics.Amongthoseaddressedintheletterssentto #l! Statespartiesrequestingfurtherinformationhavebeenanumberofprecisemattersseenasessential $X" totheimplementationoftherecommendationinquestion.Anumberofissueshavebeenhighlighted $D # toreflectnotonlytheinformationprovided,butalsotheissuesthathavenotbeenaddressedbut %0!$ whicharedeemedessentialtotheCommitteesongoingwork,inordertobeeffectiveintaking &"% preventiveandprotectivemeasurestoeliminatetortureandilltreatment. '#& 76.AmongtheRapporteursactivitiesinthepastyear,havebeenthefollowing:attendingtheinter )$( committeemeetingsinGenevawherefollowupprocedureswerediscussedwithmembersfrom |*%) othertreatybodies,anditwasdecidedtoestablishaworkinggrouponfollowup;addressingthe h+&* CommitteeontheEliminationofDiscriminationagainstWomenatitsAugust2009meetinginNew T,'+ Yorkconcerningaspectsofthefollowupprocedure;assessingresponsesfromStatespartiesand @-(, preparingfollowupletterstocountriesaswarrantedandupdatingtheinformationcollectedfrom  thefollowupprocedure.  77.Additionally,theRapporteurinitiatedastudyoftheCommitteesfollowupprocedure, t beginningwithanexaminationofthenumberandnatureoftopicsidentifiedbytheCommitteein ` itsrequeststoStatespartiesforfollowupinformation.ShereportedtotheCommitteeonsome L  preliminaryfindings,inNovember2009andlaterinMay2010,andspecificallypresentedcharts 8  showingthatthenumberoftopicsdesignatedforfollowuphassubstantiallyincreasedsincethe $ t thirtyfifthsession.Ofthe87countriesexaminedasofthefortythirdsession(November2009),one  ` tothreeparagraphsweredesignatedforfollowupfor14Statesparties,fourorfivesuchtopicswere  L  designatedfor38Statesparties,andsixormoreparagraphsweredesignatedfor35Statesparties.  8  TheRapporteurdrewthistrendtotheattentionofthemembersoftheCommitteeanditwasagreed $  inMay2010that,wheneverpossible,effortswouldhenceforthbemadetolimitthenumberof   followupitemstoamaximumoffiveparagraphs.   78.TheRapporteuralsofoundthatcertaintopicsweremorecommonlyraisedasapartofthefollow   upprocedurethanothers.Specifically,forallStatepartiesreviewedsincethefollowupprocedure p began,thefollowingtopicsweremostfrequentlydesignated: \ L  M  Ensureprompt,impartialandeffectiveinvestigation(s) p     76percent 4 Prosecuteandsanctionpersonsresponsibleforabuses p     61percent  p Guaranteelegalsafeguards   h      p     57percent  \ Enablerighttocomplainandhavecasesexamined  0 p     43percentHp(#p(# Conducttraining,awarenessraising0 h      p     43percent4h(#h(# EnsureinterrogationtechniquesinlinewiththeConvention    39percent   Provideredressandrehabilitation h      p     38percent   Endgenderbasedviolence,ensureprotectionofwomen p 0    34percent(#(# Ensuremonitoringofdetentionfacilities/visitbyindependentbody  32percent  Carryoutdatacollectionontortureandilltreatment p     30percent  L  M  Improveconditionofdetention,includingovercrowding p 0    28percentL  M  l(#(# L  M  79.  InthecorrespondencewithStatesparties,theRapporteurhasnotedrecurringconcernswhich D! arenotfullyaddressedinthefollowuprepliesandherconcerns(illustrative,notcomprehensive) 0"  havebeenincludedinpriorannualreports.Tosummarizethem,shefindsthereisconsiderablevalue #l! inhavingmorepreciseinformationbeingprovided,e.g.listsofprisoners,detailsondeathsin $X" detentionandforensicinvestigations.L  M   $D # L  M  80.AsaresultofnumerousexchangeswithStatesparties,theRapporteurhasobservedthatthere &"% isneedformorevigorousfactfindingandmonitoringinmanyStatesparties.Inaddition,thereis '#& ofteninadequategatheringandanalysingofpoliceandcriminaljusticestatistics.Whenthe (#' Committeerequestssuchinformation,Statespartiesfrequentlydonotprovideit.TheRapporteur )$( furtherconsidersthatconductingprompt,thoroughandimpartialinvestigationsintoallegationsof |*%) abuseisofgreatprotectivevalue.Thisisoftenbestundertakenthroughunannouncedinspections h+&* byindependentbodies.TheCommitteehasreceiveddocuments,informationandcomplaintsabout T,'+ theabsenceofsuchmonitoringbodies,thefailureofsuchbodiestoexerciseindependence_in @-(, carryingouttheirworkortoimplementrecommendationsforimprovement.  81.TheRapporteurhasalsopointedtotheimportanceofStatespartiesprovidingclearcut  instructionsontheabsoluteprohibitionoftortureaspartofthetrainingoflawenforcementandother t relevantpersonnel.Statespartiesneedtoprovideinformationontheresultsofmedicalexaminations ` andautopsies,andtodocumentsignsoftorture,especiallyincludingsexualviolence.Statesparties L  alsoneedtoinstructpersonnelontheneedtosecureandpreserveevidence.TheRapporteurhas 8  foundmanylacunaeinnationalstatistics,includingonpenalanddisciplinaryactionagainstlaw $ t enforcementpersonnel.Accuraterecordkeeping,coveringtheregistrationofallproceduralstepsof  ` detainedpersons,isessentialandrequiresgreaterattention.Allsuchmeasurescontributeto  L  safeguardtheindividualagainsttortureorotherformsofilltreatment,assetforthintheConvention.  8  82.Thechartbelowdetails,asof14May2010,theendoftheCommitteesfortyfourthsession,the   replieswithrespecttofollowup.ThischartalsoincludesStatespartiescommentstoconcluding   observations,ifany.    FollowupproceduretoconcludingobservationsfromMay2003toMay2010  p ... H CE.,US.,v* Fortyfirstsession(November2008)   p * VdVdvvvv` vv` vvPQ(#(#,vv,vv,` vv,vv+  8***'HH vv8L  M  L  M  Stateparty =***,!n"*** =Information n duein =***,!Z"*** =Informationreceived ?****,!n"*** ?Actiontaken L  M  J*;,n" vv  **** vvJL  M  Belgium )*2* )November2009 2*#2* 2L  M    17March2010 2 CAT/C/BEL/CO/2/Add.1 6**#!n* 6Informationunder 2  _reviewL  M  L  M  _ C**2#n! vv  ** vvC... +**F"** + 4**#F#** 4 6***#!F$"** 63)'F% vv   *** 3L  M  L  ... D!& __M   $X) _USCE., FollowupStateReporting    (i)ActionbyStateParty  CAT,CATL  M  /C/BEL/CO/2/Add.L  M  1(2010)[French]  ` L  M  -  RponsesdesuividelaBelgiqueauxobservationsfinalesduComitcontrelatorture 8  (CAT/C/BEL/CO/2)  $ t L  M  L  M  [Re uesle17mars2010]  L  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  I.Introduction  $  L  M  L  M  1.L  M  ԀL  M  LeL  M  ԀComitcontrelatortureaexaminledeuximerapportpriodiquedelaBelgique   (CAT/C/BEL/2)ses850L  M  eL  M  Ԁet853L  M  eL  M  Ԁsances,les12et13novembre2008(CAT/C/SR.850et853),   etadoptsesL  M  observationsfinalesL  M  Ԁ(CAT/C/BEL/CO/2)le19novembre2008.Danscedocument(par.   31),L  M  leComitL  M  ԀademandlaBelgiquedeluiprsenter,dansundlaidunan,desinformationssur p lasuitedonneauxrecommandationsL  M  ԀnoncesauxL  M  paragraphes6,7,11,16,20et27L  M  Ԁdeses \ observationsfinalesL  M  .Lesrenseignementsdemandssontfournisciaprs.L  M   H L  M  Rponseauparagraphe6desobservationsfinales(CAT/C/BEL/CO/2)   p L  M  A.Contr=leexternedesrapatriements L  M  ԀL  M   H L  M  L  M  2.L  M  ԀL  M  Lecontr=lesurlloignementdestrangersestassurparL  M  :L  M  Ԁlapolicearonautiquedelapolice $ fdrale(LPA/BRUNAT),chargedelencadrementdesoprationsdloignementL  M  ;L  M  ԀlInspection  gnraledelapolicefdraleetdelapolicelocale(AIG),chargeducontr=leprventifetdu  traitementdeL  M  sL  M  ԀplaintesventuellesL  M  ;L  M  ԀetleComitP,chargducontr=leexternedanssesaspects  judiciairesetnonjudiciaires,L  M  sonL  M  initiativeoulasuiteduneplainteouL  M  ԀduneL  M  dnonciation.  L  M  3L  M  .L  M  LecommandementdeLPA/BRUNATadveloppdesprocdures,dunepart,pourlimiterau \  maximumlerisquededrapageindividueldanslechefdesfonctionnairesdepoliceaffectsune H! missiondloignementet,dautrepart,L  M  pourL  M  garderL  M  sousL  M  contr=lepermanentlexcutiondeces 4"  missionsL  M  1.  #p! L  M  4.L  M  LesdirectivesrelativeslencadrementdesvolsonttdfiniesparLPA/BRUNATdansune $H # notecadre.FairepreuvedhumanitlorsdesloignementstoutenobservantstrictL  M  ementL  M  ԀL  M  lL  M  es %4!$ prescriptionsenlamatireestunevritablegageurL  M  eL  M  ԀpourlesmembresdeLPA/BRUNAT.Lobjectif & "% initialestdeconvaincrelapersonnerapatrierdequitterleterritoiresansopposerdersistancepour ' #& viterlerecourslacontraintedanslechefdesfonctionnairesdepolice.LamiseenL  M  L  M  uvrede (#' lquipedesoutiensocialetpsychologique(ESSP)deLPA/BRUNATpermetdatteindrecetobjectif )$( enlimitantlenombredeL  M  sL  M  personnesquinesouhaitentpaspartir.QuandbienmmeilfaL  M  udraitL  M  malgr *%) toutrecourirlacontraintepourprocderaurapatriementdunepersonnenesouhaitantpasquitter l+&* volontairementleterritoire,celL  M  leL  M  ԄcidoittoujourstrelgalL  M  eL  M  ,proportionnelL  M  leL  M  ԀetopportunL  M  e X,'+ L  M  conformmentauxdirectivesenusageauseindelapolicefdrale. D-(, ЇL  M  5.L  M  ԀL  M  Lorsdunemissionavecescorte,onprvoit,enplusdesdeuxescorteurs(auminimum),des  personneschargesdutransfrement,unmembredelquipedesoutiensocialetpsychologique  (ESSP)ainsiquunmembreducadrequiaccompagneL  M  lescorteL  M  aumoinsjusqu'larrivedelavion.  Lescadressontchargsdvaluer(surlabasedecertainscritres)lesmoyensdecontrainteL  M  quil t convientdL  M  appliquerousilescortedoittreintL  M  erL  M  rompue.IlscompltentlenumrodenotificationL  M  2L  M  , ` fontremplirceformulaireparL  M  BACL  M  ԄL  M  SecurityL  M  ԀetparlecommandantdebordL  M  ,L  M  ԀetL  M  pourfinirL  M  Ԁprennent L  L  M  toutesL  M  ԀL  M  dispositionsL  M  pratiquesaveccedernieretsonquipage.Lescadressoccupentgalementdu 8  L  M  L  M  briefingL  M  L  M  ԀpralableainsiqueduL  M  L  M  dbriefingL  M  L  M  Ԁencasdchecdelatentativedloignement.Une $ t L  M  checklistL  M  ԀattabliespcialeL  M  mentL  M  Ԁpourlesescortes.L  M  UL  M  nmdecinL  M  ԀesttoujoursL  M  Ԁprsentlaroport,  ` L  M  auquelonpeutfaireappelL  M  toutL  M  momentaucoursdeL  M  Ԁlaprocduredembarquement.  L  L  M  6L  M  .L  M  LInspectiongnraledelapolicefdraleetdelapolicelocale(AIG),chargeducontr=le $  prventifetventuellementdelinspectionoudutraitementdeL  M  sL  M  Ԁdossiersdeplainte,remetchaque   anneunrapportL  M  aL  M  uL  M  ML  M  inistredelL  M  iL  M  ntrieurL  M  surL  M  Ԁlecontr=ledesloignements.Enmoyenne,lAIG   contr=leunpourcentdesvolsdeligne.LesvolsscurissfontL  M  pratiquementL  M  Ԁtouslobjetdun   contr=le.LAIGnaconstatquepeudoppositionaumomentdelextractiondescellulesde   LPA/BRUNAT,pendantlaccompagnementjusqulavionL  M  ,L  M  Ԁetunefoisquelavionadcoll.En p casdemanquements,lAIGmneuneenquteapprofondie. \ L  M  7L  M  .L  M  LeComitPL  M  prendlL  M  initiativeL  M  deffectuerL  M  descontr=lesspcifiquesdesinstallationsdelapolice 4 laroportdeBruxellesL  M  ԄL  M  NationalouL  M  aumomentL  M  Ԁdelembarquementdepersonnesrapatrier.L  M  Au  p dL  M  butL  M  deL  M  2009,leComitPaprocduncontr=ledeslieuxdenfermementL  M  situsdanslaroport  \ L  M  etutilissavantlesrapatriements.AfindemieuxL  M  valuerL  M  Ԁlesmissionsmaisaussilescontraintesde H ceservicedelapolicefdrale,leComitPeffectuedesvisitesdetravaillaroportdeBruxelles 4 NationalL  M  ;L  M  Ԁunevisiteaeulieudanslecourantdelanne2005etuneautreL  M  auL  M  dbutL  M  deL  M  2009.   L  M  8L  M  .L  M  LeComitPeffectuegalementuncontr=lemarginalsurlamaniredontlInspectiongnrale  contr=leetinspectelesoprationsderapatriement.L  M  LeL  M  ԀComitPL  M  enrendL  M  comptesystmatiqueL  M  ment  L  M  danssesrapportsannuelsdactivitL  M  sL  M  .Unenotedesynthsesurlensembledelaquestiondevraittre  renduepubliquesouspeu. l L  M  9.L  M  ԀL  M  LorsdelexamendesplaintesintroduitesauprsduComitPet/ouconfiesauComitPparles D! autoritsjudiciairespourdesfaitsventuelsdecoupsetblessuresoudecomportementsinadquats 0"  danslechefdesfonctionnairesdepoliceenchargedesmissionsdloignement,unprocsverbal #l! judiciaireestsystmatiquementrdiglattentionduparquet,etcelaavanttoutdp=tdeplainte $X" parlavictime.CeprocsverbalestL  M  ,L  M  ԀenrglegnraleL  M  ,L  M  Ԁrdiglejourdelatentativedloignement $D # parledtachementpolicierdelaroport.Dslors,cestauparquetouaujugedinstructionquil %0!$ appartientdedsignerleservicequiserachargdemenerlenqute.L  M   &"% L  M  B.AccsauxcellulesetzonesdembarquementL  M  ԀetL  M  Ԁcontr=leL  M  dL  M  esONG  (#' L  M  L  M  10L  M  .L  M  PlusieursinstancesontaccstantauxcellulesquauxzonesdembarquementL  M  :L  M  Ԁdesorganesde |*%) contr=ledesservicesdepolicetantinternesquexternes(leComitP,lInspectiongnraledela h+&* policefdraleetdelapolicelocalainsiqueleservicedecontr=leinternedelapolicefdrale),L  M  leL  M   T,'+ parquet,L  M  lL  M  escommissionsparlementairesdanslecadredeleurscomptences,ainsiqueL  M  leL  M  ԀComit @-(, europenpourlaprventiondelatortureetdespeinesoutraitementsinhumainsoudgradants  (CPT)L  M  pourlexcutionL  M  Ԁdesesvisitesdecontr=le.  L  M  11L  M  .L  M  LesdispositionsrglementairesactuellesneprvoientpaslaccsdesONGauxzones t dembarquementlorsdelloignementparvoiedairdestrangers.Commeindiqucidessus,lL  M  ԀL  M  tat ` belgeaeneffetsespropresorganesdecontr=leL  M  ԀquisontL  M  ,dunepart,lInspectiongnraledela L  policefdraleetlocale(AIG),quiestplacesouslautoritduL  M  ML  M  inistredelL  M  iL  M  ntrieuretL  M  ,L  M  Ԁdautre 8  part,leComitPL  M  ,L  M  ԀL  M  cederniertantL  M  Ԁlorganedecontr=leduparlementfdral.Cesorganesdecontr=le $ t L  M  sontL  M  indpendantsL  M  etL  M  veillentaurespectdesrecommandationsenmatiredloignementmisespar  ` uneL  M  cL  M  ommissionL  M  dL  M  thique,laL  M  CommissionVermeersch L  M  .Laprparationetlexcutiondune  L  oprationL  M  dloignementL  M  demandebeaucoupdeconcentration,delarigueuretdeladiscrtiondela  <  partdespoliciersquidoivententouttempsobserverscrupuleusementlesrecommandationsdela (  CommissionVermeersch.Iladonctjugprfrabledenepascompromettrelebondroulement   detellesoprationscartouteperturbationextrieurepeutavoirdesconsquencessurlascuritet   provoquerlchecdelopration.   L  M  12L  M  .L  M  Cependant,laquestiondL  M  elexerciceparlL  M  esONGL  M  ԀdunL  M  contr=lesurlesoprationsdloignement t atsoulevelorsdelvaluationdesprocduresdloignementparlaL  M  CommissionVermeersch ` II L  M  3L  M  Ԁen2005.L  M  ToutenL  M  plaidantL  M  enfaveurdL  M  uncontr=ledesorganisationsnongouvernementales,en P susdescontr=lesexternesexercsparleComitPetlInspectiongnrale,cesorganisationstaient @ toutefoisbienconscienteL  M  sL  M  Ԁdufaitquellesnedisposaientnidutempsnidesmoyensncessairespour ,| organiseruneformeefficientedecontr=leexternesurlesloignements. h L  M  13.L  M  ԀL  M  LeL  M  GL  M  ouvernementbelgesepencheactuellementsurlamiseenuvre(L  M  prvueL  M  Ԁfin2010)dela @ directive2008/115/L  M  CL  M  EL  M  ԀL  M  duParlementL  M  europenL  M  etduConseildu16dcembre2008relativeaux , normesetprocdurescommunesapplicablesdanslestatsmembresauretourdesressortissantsde  paystiersensjourirrgulier,quiprvoitensonarticle8.6(relatiflloignement)queL  M  Lestats  membresprvoientunsystmeefficacedecontr=leduretourforc .L  M  4L  M  Ԁ  L  M  14L  M  .L  M  CettedirectiveafaitlobjetdunediscussionL  M  L  M  Ԁla8L  M  meL  M  Ԁruniondes DirectContactPointsin x ReturnMatters quisesttenuePrague,L  M  laL  M  finL  M  deL  M  mai2009.Ilatobservqueniladirective d  europennenilesprincipesdirecteursneprcisentlaporteduL  M  monitoringL  M  Ԁattendu.LaCommission P! europenneaindiququelentiretdelaprocdurederetourforcdoittrecouverte.LeL  M  monitoringL  M   <"  doitincluredespartiestierces(indpendantes)diffrentesdesautoritsquiontexcutleretourL  M  ;L  M  Ԁce (#x! quinimpliquepasncessairementquildoivesagirdONG. $d" L  M  15.L  M  ԀL  M  IlesttoutefoisprvudassocierL  M  dunecertainemanireL  M  lesONGL  M  auL  M  contr=ledesprocdures %