WPC pA@V:V:C_E1WSl_6q:=-^}5P\>NIHi`FXB\4}seQtFٜ 8g[w}|^nN>'ORmё|53A>Y>dp]צ:Шk*&שOqc]O޼=k-!r3Nm:j?O˶SlJ3DLD6zU n p+m݄d@eo99ӟa\phfnry]oA0!Qjc,$e܄5A"uLt d|bƺ#' g[f չƹļUsKӯ)mڝ)ӚRFD+$ @Ju o~ \Dݿ9Œkbq.KQTg槬4!P5q_?Nٙ+/W Q> (_17  2( 4 <DL223  Ԁ2( 4 <DL2  *DD (_16   ," <DL,23  Ԁ," <DL,   *55 (_15  ) <DL)23  Ԁ) <DL)  *22 (_14 ` &<<DL&23  Ԁ&<<DL& ` *// (_13  #DL#23  Ԁ#DL#  *,, (_12   DL 23  Ԁ DL  *)) (_11 h DDL23  ԀDDL h *&& (_10  L23  ԀL  (## &_9   L23  Ԁ L  (>> &_8  2( 4 <DL223  2( 4 <DL2  (DD &_7   ," <DL,23  ," <DL,   (55 &_6  ) <DL)23  ) <DL)  (22 &_5 ` &<<DL&23  &<<DL& ` (// &_4  #DL#23  #DL#  (,, &_3   DL 23   DL  ()) &_2 h DDL23  DDL h (&& &_1  L23  L  &## $_   L23   L  6 4heading 1     2( 4 <DL2  UK XXX       US   2( 4 <DL2  <:Default ParaD -6 2qq0ParaNo.   5+ B <DL5 UK XXX US   5+ B <DL5  <g5] :Outline001_1  5+ 4 <DL5B  23  C  ..5+ 4 <DL5  %%%%%%%%(35;AGMSY_11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.&%1.3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)(i)_5:i+003|xU&%1.  d[ [d>TABLE A(;3$2#  0  .3  0  TABLE A \!CEUS.,  _XX    BELGIUM #X X=#  h Follow-up-StateReporting  ЀActionbyTreatyBodies   _CCPR_,A/60/40vol.I(2005)  t  CHAPTERVII.FOLLOWUPTOCONCLUDINGOBSERVATIONS 8    ... `    233.ForallreportsofStatespartiesexaminedbytheCommitteeunderarticle40oftheCovenant 8  overthelastyear,theCommitteehasidentified,accordingtoitsdevelopingpractice,alimited $  numberofpriorityconcerns,withrespecttowhichitseekstheStatepartysresponse,withinaperiod   ofayear,onthemeasurestakentogiveeffecttoitsrecommendations.TheCommitteewelcomes   theextentanddepthofcooperationunderthisprocedurebyStatesparties,asmaybeobservedfrom  thecomprehensivetablepresentedbelow.Since18June2004,15Statesparties(Egypt,Germany,  Kenya,Latvia,Lithuania,Morocco,theNetherlands,thePhilippines,Portugal,theRussian p Federation,SerbiaandMontenegro,Slovakia,Sweden,TogoandVenezuela)havesubmitted \ informationtotheCommitteeunderthefollowupprocedure.Sincethefollowupprocedurewas H institutedinMarch2001,onlysixStatesparties(Colombia,Israel,Mali,RepublicofMoldova,Sri 4 LankaandSuriname)havefailedtosupplyfollowupinformationthathadfallendue.The  p Committeereiteratesthatitviewsthisprocedureasaconstructivemechanismbywhichthedialogue  \ initiatedwiththeexaminationofareportcanbecontinued,andwhichservestosimplifytheprocess H ofthenextperiodicreportonthepartoftheStateparty. 4 224.ThetablebelowdetailstheexperienceoftheCommitteeoverthelastyear.Accordingly,it   containsnoreferencetothoseStatespartieswithrespecttowhichtheCommittee,uponassessment  ofthefollowupresponsesprovidedtoit,decidedtotakenofurtheractionpriortotheperiod  coveredbythisreport.   *607ddd Xdd Xdd X(#(#,dd ,dd ,dd , dd +  D#!D# StateParty '#" 'DateInformation ## Due '$$ 'DateReply #% Received '$& 'FurtherAction +!#' +... &d!( USCE.,Eightyfirstsession(July2004)CE.,US.,F  * 'P") *Belgium J@(#*   @38561 @ J29July2005 I?:(#+  @38561  @  IЄ '(#,  'Є((#-   (  )$- USCE., _CCPR_,A/61/40vol.I(2006)   L  M  L  M  CHAPTERVII. t FOLLOW-UPTOCONCLUDINGOBSERVATIONS  L  L  M  L  M  234.InchapterVIIofitsannualreportfor2003(A/58/40,vol.I),theCommitteedescribedthe $ t frameworkthatithassetoutforprovidingformoreeffectivefollow-up,subsequenttotheadoption  ` oftheconcludingobservationsinrespectofStatespartiesreportssubmittedunderarticle40ofthe  L  Covenant.InchapterVIIofitslastannualreport(A/60/40,vol.I),anupdatedaccountofthe  8  Committeesexperienceinthisregardoverthelastyearwasprovided.Thecurrentchapteragain $  updatestheCommitteesexperienceto1August2006.   235.Overtheperiodcoveredbythepresentannualreport,Mr.Rafael_Rivas_Ԁ_Posada_Ԁcontinuedto   actastheCommitteesSpecialRapporteurforfollow-uptoconcludingobservations.Atthe   Committeeseighty-fifth,eighty-sixthandeighty-seventhsessions,hepresentedprogressreportsto p theCommitteeon_intersessional_Ԁdevelopmentsandmaderecommendationswhichpromptedthe \ CommitteetotakeappropriatedecisionsonaState-by-Statebasis. H 236.ForallreportsofStatespartiesexaminedbytheCommitteeunderarticle40oftheCovenant  p overthelastyear,theCommitteehasidentified,accordingtoitsdevelopingpractice,alimited  \ numberofpriorityconcerns,withrespecttowhichitseekstheStatepartysresponse,withinaperiod H ofayear,onthemeasurestakentogiveeffecttoitsrecommendations.TheCommitteewelcomes 4 theextentanddepthofcooperationunderthisprocedurebyStatesparties,asmaybeobservedfrom   thefollowingcomprehensivetable.Overthereportingperiod,since1August2005,14Statesparties   (Albania,Belgium,Benin,Colombia,ElSalvador,Kenya,Mauritius,Philippines,Poland,Serbiaand  Montenegro,SriLanka,Tajikistan,TogoandUganda)havesubmittedinformationtotheCommittee  underthefollow-upprocedure.Sincethefollow-upprocedurewasinstitutedinMarch2001,only  11Statesparties(EquatorialGuinea,Greece,Iceland,Israel,Mali,Moldova,Namibia,Suriname, l theGambia,UzbekistanandVenezuela)havefailedtosupplyfollow-upinformationthathasfallen X  due.TheCommitteereiteratesthatitviewsthisprocedureasaconstructivemechanismbywhich D! thedialogueinitiatedwiththeexaminationofareportcanbecontinued,andwhichservestosimplify 0"  theprocessofthenextperiodicreportonthepartoftheStateparty. #l! L  M  237.ThetablebelowdetailstheexperienceoftheCommitteeoverthelastyear.Accordingly,it $D # containsnoreferencetothoseStatespartieswithrespecttowhichtheCommittee,uponassessment %0!$ ofthefollow-upresponsesprovidedtoit,decidedtotakenofurtheractionpriortotheperiod &"% coveredbythisreport. '#&  @-(, Ї*23dddd dd dd  dd 607(#(#,Sdd ,rdd ,dd , dd +  $ $Stateparty 'd 'Date d informationdue 'P 'Datereply d received 'P 'Furtheraction "d "L  M  ...  Eighty-firstsession(July2004)  l L  M  L  M  Belgium  <  Fourthperiodic    reportexamined     L  M  L  M  29July2005  <  Paras.12,16and   27    L  M  L  M  9December2005  < (completereply)   ( L  M  L  M  Atitseighty-sixthsession,  < theCommitteedecidedto  ( takenofurtheraction.    ...  0    0    0   0   CE.,US.,