WPC q6=gB,lQGuzIOl!,їHINu5B[P#D]|eIHVe78rhgA911k:4#EA(Ayj ]#jYL5-jZO?4Ø,SH-<qTll 4UK_:/)eANHJ_isSxӠ ֪&0 {ŰPd[?MI]|J*{j/|sKx ɫ 0}U%* U -+ NX UBZ DE U> f a! f5 f7 a9 aM fa ac 0Uw 0 0 0h 0! 0 0 0( 0 0d 0# 0 0 0B 0 0~fa 0) 0 0? 0 0fmao 0f'a) B-= 0jf 0  0 04 0 0<DU@a BHP Officejet 6500 E710n-z (Network)0(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularX(J$  XXXXXXXX˖> UW=:i+003|x#U42ParaNo. 8.9 AIQ!$8S \  `&Times New RomanS8.9 AIQ!$8S \  `&Times New RomanS<SS:Footnote TexS \  `&Times New RomanSS \  `&Times New RomanS\  `&Times New Roman  ##Xd#\  `*Times New RomanTT88889Hairline!dxdx\  `&Times New RomanhTABLE ATABLE BTABLE A&TABLE C*+ (_2623  ..*D+D (_25   ," <DL,23  ..," <DL,   *5+5 (_24  ) <DL)23  ..) <DL)  *2+2 (_23 ` &<<DL&23  ..&<<DL& ` */+/ (_22  #DL#23  ..#DL#  *,+, (_21   DL 23  .. DL  *)+) (_20 h DDL23  ..DDL h *&+& (_19  L23  ..L  *#+# (_18   L23  .. L  *>> (_17  2( 4 <DL223  Ԁ2( 4 <DL2  *DD (_16   ," <DL,23  Ԁ," <DL,   *55 (_15  ) <DL)23  Ԁ) <DL)  *22 (_14 ` &<<DL&23  Ԁ&<<DL& ` *// (_13  #DL#23  Ԁ#DL#  *,, (_12   DL 23  Ԁ DL  *)) (_11 h DDL23  ԀDDL h RTABLE A*&& (_10  L23  ԀL  (## &_9   L23  Ԁ L  (>> &_8  2( 4 <DL223  2( 4 <DL2  (DD &_7   ," <DL,23  ," <DL,   (55 &_6  ) <DL)23  ) <DL)  Table_A(22 &_5 ` &<<DL&23  &<<DL& ` TABLE A)Hairline d(// &_4  #DL#23  #DL#  (,, &_3   DL 23   DL  ()) &_2 h DDL23  DDL h (&& &_1  L23  L  &## $_   L23   L  <:Default Para(9 Z(Times New Roman TABLE E d !  XXXXXXXX  _  XXCAMEROON#XX؄#   u UKUS.,Follow-upJurisprudence    ActionbyTreatyBodiesUS.,UK.,  _CCPR_ԀA/51/40,vol.I(1996)  t  VIII.FOLLOW-UPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL L  ... $ t  429.Acountry-by-countrybreakdownoffollow-uprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstanding L  asat26July1996providesthefollowingpicture: 8  ...   Cameroon:Onedecisionfindingviolations;nofollow-upreplyreceived,inspiteofreminder  addressedtotheStatepartyon28June1995.Follow-upconsultationswiththePermanentMission  ofCameroontobeconductedduringthefifty-eighthsession. p   H _  CCPRA/52/40,vol.I(1997)   VIII.FOLLOW-UPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL  ... ` 524.Acountry-by-countrybreakdownoffollow-uprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstanding 8  asof30June1997providesthefollowingpicture(Viewsinwhichthedeadlineforreceiptof $ t follow-upinformationhadnotyetexpiredhavenotbeenincluded):  ` ...  8  Cameroon:Onedecisionfindingviolations:458/1991-Mukong(1994Report);9/Stateparty   follow-upreplyremainsoutstanding.Follow-upconsultationswiththePermanentMissionof   Cameroonwereheldduringthesixtiethsession(seebelow,para.532).   ... p Overviewoffollow-uprepliesreceivedandoftheSpecialRapporteur'sfollow-upconsultations H duringthereportingperiod 4 ...  \ 532.Cameroon:On16July1997theSpecialRapporteurmetwiththePermanentRepresentativeof 4 CameroontodiscusstheStateparty'sfailure,untilmid-1997,toimplementtheCommittee's   recommendationsintheViewsoncaseNo.458/1991(Mukong),adoptedinJuly1994.Heexplained   boththeOptionalProtocolandthefollow-upprocedureandinsistedthattheStatepartywasunder  anobligationtoprovidetheauthorwithsomeremedy.ThePermanentRepresentativeexpressed  surpriseattheCommittee'sfindingsonarticles7and9,paragraph1,oftheCovenantintheauthor's  caseandsuggestedthattheStatepartymightnothavebeengivensufficientopportunitytorefutethe l author'sallegations.TheSpecialRapporteurpointedoutthattheStatepartywasgivenfull X  opportunitytoprovideitsobservationsand,infact,didmaketwosubmissions,andthatthe D! CommitteeadopteditsViewsafterfullconsiderationofallthematerial.TheStatepartyhad,by 0"  ratifyingtheOptionalProtocol,undertakentoimplementtheCommittee'sViews;therefore,the #l! ViewsexpressedbytheCommitteewerebindingontheStateparty.ThePermanentRepresentative $X" statedthathewouldconveytheCommittee'sconcerntotheStatepartyauthoritiesbutfurther $D # indicatedthattheStatepartyshouldhavesomemarginofdiscretionindecidingnotonlyonthe %0!$ amountofcompensationtobegiventotheauthor,butalsoontheprincipleofcompensation.Even &"% ifcompensationweretobepaidtotheauthoronanexgratiabasis,thatwouldnotnecessarilyimply '#& anadmissionofresponsibilityonthepartoftheStateparty. (#' ... |*%) _________ h+&*   9/OfficialRecordsoftheGeneralAssembly,FortyninthSession,SupplementNo.40 T,'+ (A/49/40). @-(, ЇConcernoverinstancesofnon-cooperationunderthefollow-upmandate  554.Inspiteofsomeprogressincollectingfollow-upinformationsincetheadoptionofits1996  Report,theCommitteeandtheSpecialRapporteurnotewithconcernthatanumberofcountriesdid t notprovideanyfollow-upinformationwithinthedeadlinesestablishedbytheCommitteeorhave ` notrepliedtoremindersorrequestsforinformationfromtheSpecialRapporteur.ThoseStateswhich L  havenotrepliedtorequestsforfollow-upinformationarethefollowing(inalphabeticalorder): 8  Cameroon:onecase  ` 555.TheCommitteeurgesthoseStatespartiestoreplytotheSpecialRapporteur'srequestsfor  8  follow-upinformationwithinthedeadlinesthathavebeenset. $        CCPRA/53/40,vol.I(1998)   VIII.FOLLOW-UPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL  ... ` 486.TheCommittee'spreviousreport(A/52/40)containedadetailedcountry-by-countrybreakdown 8  offollow-uprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstandingasof30June1997.Thelistthatfollows $ t showstheadditionalcasesinrespectofwhichfollow-upinformationhasbeenrequestedfromStates  ` (Viewsinwhichthedeadlineforreceiptoffollow-upinformationhadnotyetexpiredhavenotbeen  L  included).Italsoindicatesthosecasesinwhichrepliesareoutstanding.Inmanyofthesecasesthere  8  hasbeennochangesincethepreviousreport.Thisisbecausetheresourcesavailableforthe $  Committee'sworkwereconsiderablyreducedinthecurrentyear,preventingitfromundertakinga   comprehensivesystematicfollow-upprogramme.   ...   Cameroon:Onedecisionfindingviolations:458/1991-Mukong(1994Report(A/49/40));State \ partyfollow-upreplyremainsoutstanding;see1997Report(A/52/40),paras.524and532. H Concernoverthefollowupmandate  p ... H 510.TheCommitteeagainexpressesitsregretthatitsrecommendations,formulatedinits1995,   1996and1997Reports,totheeffectthatatleastonefollowupmissionperyearbebudgetedbythe   OfficeoftheUnitedNationsHighCommissionerforHumanRights,havestillnotbeen  implemented.Similarly,theCommitteeconsidersthatstaffresourcestoservicethefollowup  mandateremaininadequate,despitetheCommitteesrepeatedrequests,andthatthispreventsthe  properandtimelyconductoffollowupactivities,includingfollowupmissions.Inthiscontext,the l Committeeexpressesseriousconcernthat,becauseofthelackofstaff,nofollowupconsultations X  couldbeorganizedduringitssixtysecondsessionoratitssixtythirdsession.Itisforthisreason D! thattheCommitteeisunabletoincludeinthepresentreportacompletelistofStateswhichhave 0"  failedtocooperateunderthefollowupprocedure.Stateslistedinthepreviousyearsreportfor #l! whichrepliesarestilloutstandingare:Cameroon,DemocraticRepublicoftheCongo,Equatorial $X" Guinea,Jamaica,LibyanArabJamahiriya,Madagascar,Nicaragua,Toto,UruguayandZambia. $D #   &"%  CCPRA/54/40,vol.I(1999)   VII.FOLLOW-UPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL  461.TheCommittee'spreviousreport(A/53/40)containedadetailedcountry-by-countrybreakdown ` offollow-uprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstandingasof30June1998.Thelistthatfollows L  showstheadditionalcasesinrespectofwhichfollow-upinformationhasbeenrequestedfromStates 8  (Viewsinwhichthedeadlineforreceiptoffollow-upinformationhadnotyetexpiredhavenotbeen $ t included).Italsoindicatesthosecasesinwhichrepliesareoutstanding.Inmanyofthesecasesthere  ` hasbeennochangesincethelastreport.ThisisbecausetheresourcesavailablefortheCommittee's  L  workhavebeenconsiderablyreducedpreventingitfromundertakingacomprehensivesystematic  8  follow-upprogramme. $  Ѐ...   Cameroon:Onedecisionfindingviolations:458/1991-Mukong(A/49/40);Statepartyfollow-up   replyremainsoutstanding.SeeA/52/40,paras.524,532. p    `     h      p       CCPRA/55/40,vol.I(2000)   UKUS.,  XXXX  XXX X %  VI.FOLLOWUPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL %%݌  ЌXXXX     `    # XXXX%#XXX X... ` # XXXX&#XXX X596.TheCommitteespreviousreport(A/54/40)containedadetailedcountrybycountrybreakdown 8  offollowuprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstandingasof30June1999.Thelistthatfollows $ t showstheadditionalcasesinrespectofwhichfollowupinformationhasbeenrequestedfromStates.  ` (Viewsinwhichthedeadlineforreceiptoffollowupinformationhadnotyetexpiredhavenotbeen  L  included.)Italsoindicatesthosecasesinwhichrepliesareoutstanding.Inmanyofthesecasesthere  8  hasbeennochangesincethelastreport.Thisisbecausethelimitedresourcesavailableforthe $  Committeesworkpreventitfromundertakingacomprehensiveorsystematicfollowupprogramme.   ...   Cameroon:Onedecisionfindingviolations:458/1991Mukong(A/49/40);Statepartyfollowup p replyremainsoutstanding.SeeA/52/40,paras.524and532.# XXXXY'#US.,UK.,}% \   4  8XXdd8   CCPRA/56/40,vol.I(2001)   XXX XUKUS.,ChapterIV.FollowupActivitiesundertheOptionalProtocolUS.,UK.,,UKUS.,# XXXXㄧ,#XXX X    ... ` 180.  TheCommitteespreviousannualreport(A/55/40,vol.I,chap.VI)containedadetailed 8  countrybycountrysurveyonfollowuprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstandingasof30June $ t 2000.Thelistthatfollowsupdatesthatsurvey,indicatingthosecasesinwhichrepliesare  ` outstanding,butdoesnottakeintoaccounttheCommitteesViewsadoptedduringtheseventy  L  secondsession,forwhichfollowuprepliesarenotyetdue.Inmanycasestherehasbeennochange  8  sincethepreviousreport. $  ...   Cameroon:Viewsinonecasefindingviolations:458/1991Mukong(A/49/40);followupreply   remainsoutstanding.SeeA/52/40,paragraphs524,532.# XXXXf-#US.,UK.,1-  p  XXX XUKUS.,CCPRA/57/40,vol.I(2002)   ChapterVI.Followupactivitiesundertheoptionalprotocol  ... ` 228.ThepreviousannualreportoftheCommittee(A/56/40,vol.I,chap.VI)containedadetailed 8  countrybycountrysurveyoffollowuprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstandingasof30June $ t 2001.Thelistthatfollowsupdatesthatsurvey,indicatingthosecasesinwhichrepliesare  ` outstanding,butdoesnotincluderesponsesconcerningtheCommitteesViewsadoptedduringthe  L  seventyfourthandseventyfifthsessions,forwhichfollowuprepliesarenotyetdue.Inmanycases  8  therehasbeennochangesincethepreviousreport. $  ...     Cameroon:Viewsintwocaseswithfindingsofviolations:   458/1991Mukong(A/49/40);followupreplyremainsoutstanding.SeeA/52/40,paragraphs524, \ 532; H 630/1995Mazou(A/56/40);forfollowupreply,seeparagraph[235]below.  p ... H 229.ForfurtherinformationonthestatusofalltheViewsinwhichfollowupinformationremains   outstandingorinrespectofwhichfollowupconsultationshavebeenorwillbescheduled,reference   ismadetothefollowupprogressreportpreparedfortheseventy-fourthsessionoftheCommittee  (CCPR/C/74/R.7/Rev.1,dated28March2002),discussedinpublicsessionattheCommittees  2009thmeetingon4April2002(CCPR/C/SR.2009).ReferenceisalsomadetotheCommittees  previousreports,inparticularA/56/40,paragraphs182to200. l Overviewoffollowuprepliesreceivedduringthereportingperiod,SpecialRapporteursfollowup D! consultationsandotherdevelopments 0"  230.TheCommitteewelcomesthefollowuprepliesthathavebeenreceivedduringthereporting $X" periodandexpressesitsappreciationforallthemeasurestakenorenvisagedtoprovidevictimsof $D # violationsoftheCovenantwithaneffectiveremedy.ItencouragesallStatespartieswhichhave %0!$ addressedpreliminaryfollowuprepliestotheSpecialRapporteurtoconcludetheirinvestigations &"% inasexpeditiousamanneraspossibleandtoinformtheSpecialRapporteuroftheirresults.The '#& followuprepliesreceivedduringtheperiodunderreviewandotherdevelopmentsaresummarized (#' below. )$( ... h+&* 235.Cameroon:WithregardtocaseNo.630/1995Mazou(A/56/40),theStatepartyinformedthe @-(, Committeebyanoteverbaleof5April2002thattheauthorhadbeenreintegratedintothejudicial  corps,andthathiscareerisfollowingitsnormalcourse.TheStatepartynoted,however,thatthere  isnorightto reconstitutionoftheauthorscareer.Itwasopentotheauthortoapplytotherelevant  administrativeauthoritytothisend,buttodatehehadnotdoneso.Assuch,thiselementofthe t authorsclaimshouldbeconsideredinadmissible.Inanyevent,gradeadvancementisnotautomatic ` anddependsonavarietyofindividualfactorsincludingbudgetaryresources.Moreover,theauthor L  hadnotmadeanapplicationtotheMinistryofJusticeforadvancementaswasopentohim.The 8  Statepartyundertooktoguardagainstafuturerecurrenceofdelaysinhandlingsimilarclaims. $ t ...  L     8  US.,UK.,1CEUS., CCPRA/58/40,vol.I(2003)   CHAPTERVI.FollowupactivitiesundertheOptionalProtocol  ... ` 223.ThepreviousannualreportoftheCommittee1containedadetailedcountrybycountrysurvey 8  offollowuprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstandingasof30June2002.Thelistthatfollows $ t updatesthatsurvey,indicatingthosecasesinwhichrepliesareoutstanding,butdoesnotinclude  ` responsesconcerningtheCommitteesViewsadoptedduringtheseventyseventhandseventyeighth  L  sessions,forwhichfollowuprepliesarenotyetdueinthemajorityofcases.Inmanycasesthere  8  hasbeennochangesincethepreviousreport.* $  ...   Cameroon:0 `  Viewsintwocaseswithfindingsofviolations: ` (#` (# 0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#458/1991Mukong(A/49/40);followupreplyremainsoutstanding.See \ A/52/40,paragraphs524and532;H (# (# 0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#630/1995Mazou(A/56/40);forfollowupreply,seeA/57/40,paragraph  p 235. \ (# (# Notes   1.[OfficialRecordsoftheGeneralAssembly],FiftyseventhSession,SupplementNo.40(A/57/40),  vol.I,chap.VI.  *ThedocumentsymbolA/[SessionNo.]/40referstotheOfficialRecordoftheGeneralAssembly l inwhichthecaseappears;annexVIreferstothepresentreport,vol.II. X  US.,CE.,TA# XXXXb1#  0"  XXX XCEUS., CCPRCCPR/C/80/FU/1(2004)    Follow-UpProgressReportsubmittedbyTheSpecialRapporteurforFollow-UponViews  t Follow-upprogressreport L  1.ThecurrentreportupdatesthepreviousFollow-upProgressReport,(CCPR/C/71/R.13)[Ed.Note: $ t CCPR/C/71/R.13isnotpubliclyavailable]whichfocusedoncasesinwhich,bytheendofFebruary  ` 2001,nooronlyincompletefollow-upinformationhadbeenreceivedfromStatesparties,orwhere  L  follow-upinformationchallengedthefindingsandrecommendationsoftheCommittee.Inaneffort  8  toreducethesizeofthefollow-upreport,thiscurrentreportonlyreflectscasesinwhichinformation $  wasreceivedfromeithertheauthorortheStatepartyfrom1March2001to2April2004.Itisthe   intentionoftheSpecialRapporteurtoupdatethisreportonanannualbasis.   ...   CAMEROON: \ Mazouv.Cameroon,Caseno.630/1995,Viewsadoptedon26July2001 4 Violationsfound:Articles25(c)and2.  \ Issuesofcase:Unfairdismissalfrompublicservice;unduedelay. 4 Remedyrecommended:Toreinstatetheauthorinhiscareer,withalltheattendantconsequences   underCameroonianlaw.  DeadlineforStatepartyfollow-upinformation:1November2001  Follow-upinformationreceivedfromStateparty:Byanoteverbaleof5April2002,theStateparty X  informedtheCommitteethattheauthorhadbeenreintegratedintothejudicialcorps,andthathis D! careerisfollowingitsnormalcourse.TheStatepartynoted,however,thatthereisnorightto 0"  "reconstitution"oftheauthor'scareer.Itwasopentotheauthortoapplytotherelevant #l! administrativeauthoritytothisend,buttodatehehadnotdoneso.Assuch,thiselementofthe $X" author'sclaimshouldbeconsideredinadmissible.Inanyevent,gradeadvancementisnotautomatic $D # anddependsonavarietyofindividualfactorsincludingbudgetaryresources.Moreover,theauthor %0!$ hadnotmadeanapplicationtotheMinistryofJusticeforadvancementaswasopentohim.The &"% Statepartyundertooktoguardagainstafuturerecurrenceofdelaysinhandlingsimilarclaims. '#& Follow-upinformationreceivedfromauthor:None )$( SpecialRapporteur'srecommendations:Nofurtherconsiderationunderthefollow-upprocedure h+&* required,astheStatepartyhascompliedwiththeViews. T,'+ ...# XXXXH#US.,CE.,H  @-(, XXX XCEUS., CCPRA/59/40vol.I(2004)   CHAPTERVI.FOLLOWUPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL  ... ` 230.ThepreviousannualreportoftheCommittee1containedadetailedcountry-by-countrysurvey 8  offollowuprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstandingasof30June2003.Thelistthatfollows $ t updatesthatsurvey,indicatingthosecasesinwhichrepliesareoutstanding,butdoesnotinclude  ` responsesconcerningtheCommitteesViewsadoptedduringtheeightiethandeightyfirstsessions,  L  forwhichfollowuprepliesarenotyetdueinthemajorityofcases.Inmanycasestherehasbeen  8  nochangesincethepreviousreport.* $  ...   US.,CE.,U*34 ddd Xdd Xdd X(#(#,UU,UU+  1'   1UKUS.,Cameroon: '  'Viewsintwocaseswithfindingsofviolations: ?5   ? '8 '458/1991Mukong(A/49/40);followupreplyremainsoutstanding.See 8 A/52/40,paragraphs524and532; 6,$t  6 '( '630/1995Mazou(A/56/40);forfollowupreply,seeA/57/40,paragraph ( 235.Inthefollowupreport(CCPR/C/80/FU1),adoptedbythe  Committeeduringitseightiethsession,theSpecialRapporteur  recommendedthatthiscaseshouldnotbeconsideredfurtherunderthe  followupprocedureastheStatepartyhadcompliedwiththeViews.US.,UK.,Y$   $CEUS.,_______________ d Notes P 1/Ibid.,FiftyeighthSession,SupplementNo.40(A/58/40),vol.I,chap.VI.  ( *ThedocumentsymbolA/[sessionNo.]/40referstotheOfficialRecordsoftheGeneralAssembly "! inwhichthecaseappears;annexIXreferstothepresentreport,volumeII. #" # XXXXT#US.,CE., ]  `&!% XXX XCEUS., CCPR,A/60/40vol.I(2005)   CHAPTERVI.FOLLOWUPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL t 224.InJuly1990,theCommitteeestablishedaprocedureforthemonitoringoffollowuptoits L  Viewsunderarticle5,paragraph4,oftheOptionalProtocol,andcreatedthemandateoftheSpecial 8  RapporteurforthefollowuponViewstothiseffect.Mr.AndohasbeentheSpecialRapporteur $ t sinceMarch2001(seventyfirstsession).  ` 225.In1991,theSpecialRapporteurbegantorequestfollowupinformationfromStatesparties.  8  SuchinformationhasbeensystematicallyrequestedinrespectofallViewswithafindingofa $  violationofCovenantrights.Atotalof391Viewsoutofthe503Viewsadoptedsince1979   concludedthattherehadbeenaviolationoftheCovenant.   228.Inmanycases,theSecretariathasalsoreceivedinformationfromcomplainantstotheeffect   thattheCommitteesViewshavenotbeenimplemented.Conversely,inrareinstances,thepetitioner p hasinformedtheCommitteethattheStatepartyhasinfactgiveneffecttotheCommittees \ recommendations,eventhoughtheStatepartydidnotitselfprovidethatinformation. H 229.Thepresentannualreportadoptsadifferentformatforthepresentationoffollowup  p informationcomparedtopreviousannualreports.Thetablebelowdisplaysacompletepictureof  \ followuprepliesfromStatespartiesreceivedasof28July2005,inrelationtoViewsinwhichthe H CommitteefoundviolationsoftheCovenant.Whereverpossible,itindicateswhetherfollowup 4 repliesareorhavebeenconsideredassatisfactoryorunsatisfactory,intermsofcomplyingwiththe   CommitteesViews,orwhetherthedialoguebetweentheStatepartyandtheSpecialRapporteurfor   followuponViewscontinues.Thenotesfollowinganumberofcaseentriesconveyanideaofthe  difficultiesincategorizingfollowupreplies.  230.FollowupinformationprovidedbyStatespartiesandbypetitionersortheirrepresentatives l sincethelastannualreportissetoutinanewannexVII,containedinVolumeIIofthepresent X  annualreport.This,moredetailed,followupinformationalsoindicatesactionstilloutstandingin D! thosecasesthatremainunderreview. 0"    $D # TRO'3#Avery 12-294/295 Laser Ta LandscapeX3' Letter'3Letter LandscapeLaser Ta Landscape3'LetterT   FOLLOWUPRECEIVEDTODATEFORALLCASESOFVIOLATIONSOFTHECOVENANT   k*6D7ed dUUUU34..,'bZ,4bZ, bZ,'bZ,bZ,bZ,bb+  6DD'zz @6PXX# PP_#P PUS.,CE.,;_UKUS.,Statepartyand  numberofcases J withviolation# PPm#P PUS.,UK.,mCEUS., ;DD,! b@DD @;# PPn#P PUS.,CE.,nUKUS.,Communicationnumber,  authorandlocationa# PP*o#P PUS.,UK.,coCEUS., ;DD,!J@DD @;  # PPo#P PUS.,CE.,pUKUS.,Followupresponsereceivedfrom   Statepartyandlocation# PPp#P PUS.,UK.,pCEUS., ;DD,!J @DD @;Satisfactory   response ;DD,!J @DD @;Unsatisfactory   response ;DD,!J@DD @;Nofollowup  response ?DDD,!J@DD @?Followup  dialogue J ongoing IDD:' b@  DDD @I... ;DD,! :@DD @; ;DD,! :@DD @; ;DD,! :@DD @; ;DD,! :@DD @; ;DD,! :@DD @; ?DDD,! :@DD @? NDD?' :@  DDD @NCameroon(3) ;DD,! @DD @;458/1991,Mukong   A/49/40 ;DD,! @DD @; ;DD,! @DD @; ;DD,! @DD @; ;DD,!  @DD @;X  ! A/52/40 ?DDD,! "@DD @?X NDD?' #@  DDD @N ;DD,!b $@DD @;630/1995,Mazou b % A/56/40 ;DD,!* z&@DD @;X b ' A/57/40 ;DD,!* z(@DD @;X b ) A/59/40 ;DD,!* z*@DD @; ;DD,!b +@DD @; ?DDD,!b ,@DD @? PDDD?'b -@  DDD @P =DDD,!R .@DDD @=1134/2002,GorjiDinka R / A/60/40 =DDD,! 0@DDD @= =DDD,!R 1@DDD @= =DDD,!R 2@DDD @= =DDD,!R 3@DDD @=X ?DDDD,!R 4@DDD @?X7-+R 5@   DDDD 7#XXP{m#aThelocationreferstothedocumentsymboloftheOfficialRecordsoftheGeneralAssembly,SupplementNo.40,whichistheannual  6 reportoftheCommitteetotherespectivesessionsoftheAssembly. v 7   d 8 TRX3'LetterO'3#Avery 12-294/295 Laser Ta Landscape3'Letter   XX'3Letter LandscapeLaser Ta LandscapeTUS.,CE.,q CCPR,A/61/40vol.I(2006)   ... ` L  M  CHAPTERVIFOLLOW-UPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL 8  227.InJuly1990,theCommitteeestablishedaprocedureforthemonitoringoffollow-uptoits  ` Viewsunderarticle5,paragraph4,oftheOptionalProtocol,andcreatedthemandateoftheSpecial  L  Rapporteurforfollow-uptoViewstothiseffect.Mr.AndohasbeentheSpecialRapporteursince  8  March2001(seventy-firstsession). $  228.In1991,theSpecialRapporteurbegantorequestfollow-upinformationfromStatesparties.   SuchinformationhasbeensystematicallyrequestedinrespectofallViewswithafindingofa   violationofCovenantrights;429Viewsoutofthe547Viewsadoptedsince1979concludedthat   therehadbeenaviolationoftheCovenant. p 229.Allattemptstocategorizefollow-uprepliesbyStatespartiesareinherentlyimpreciseand H subjective:itaccordinglyisnotpossibletoprovideaneatstatisticalbreakdownoffollow-upreplies. 4 Manyfollow-uprepliesreceivedmaybeconsideredsatisfactory,inthattheydisplaythewillingness  p oftheStatepartytoimplementtheCommitteesrecommendationsortoofferthecomplainantan  \ appropriateremedy.Otherrepliescannotbeconsideredsatisfactorybecausetheyeitherdonot H addresstheCommitteesViewsatalloronlyrelatetocertainaspectsofthem.Somerepliessimply 4 notethatthevictimhasfiledaclaimforcompensationoutsidestatutorydeadlinesandthatno   compensationcanthereforebepaid.Stillotherrepliesindicatethatthereisnolegalobligationon   theStatepartytoprovidearemedy,butthataremedywillbeaffordedtothecomplainantonanL  M  ex  gratiaL  M  Ԁbasis.  230.Theremainingfollow-upreplieschallengetheCommitteesViewsandfindingsonfactualor l legalgrounds,constitutemuch-belatedsubmissionsonthemeritsofthecomplaint,promisean X  investigationofthematterconsideredbytheCommitteeorindicatethattheStatepartywillnot,for D! onereasonoranother,giveeffecttotheCommitteesViews. 0"  231.Inmanycases,theSecretariathasalsoreceivedinformationfromcomplainantstotheeffect $X" thattheCommitteesViewshavenotbeenimplemented.Conversely,inrareinstances,thepetitioner $D # hasinformedtheCommitteethattheStatepartyhadinfactgiveneffecttotheCommittees %0!$ recommendations,eventhoughtheStatepartyhadnotitselfprovidedthatinformation. &"% 232.Thepresentannualreportadoptsthesameformatforthepresentationoffollow-upinformation (#' asthelastannualreport.Thetablebelowdisplaysacompletepictureoffollow-uprepliesfrom )$( Statespartiesreceivedupto7July2006,inrelationtoViewsinwhichtheCommitteefound |*%) violationsoftheCovenant.Whereverpossible,itindicateswhetherfollow-uprepliesareorhave h+&* beenconsideredassatisfactoryorunsatisfactory,intermsoftheircompliancewiththeCommittees T,'+ Views,orwhetherthedialoguebetweentheStatepartyandtheSpecialRapporteurforfollow-upto @-(, Viewscontinues.TheNotesfollowinganumberofcaseentriesconveyanideaofthedifficulties  incategorizingfollow-upreplies.  233.  Follow-upinformationprovidedbyStatespartiesandbypetitionersortheirrepresentatives t subsequenttothelastannualreport(A/60/40,vol.I,chap.VI)issetoutinannexVIItovolumeII ` ofthepresentannualreport.  L  TRO'3Letter LandscapeX3'Letter'3Letter LandscapeX3'3'Letter   XXTL  M  L  M  FOLLOW-UPRECEIVEDTODATEFORALLCASESOFVIOLATIONSOFTHECOVENANT   *Dded'bZ'4bZ4 bZ 'bZ'bZbZbb6D7..,dd ,dd , dd ,dd ,dd ,edd ,dd +  $ $Stateparty @ andnumber . ofcaseswith  violation '  'L  M  L  M  Communication @ number,authorand . location '  'L  M  L  M  Follow-upresponse @  receivedfromStateparty .  andlocation '  'L  M  L  M  Satisfactory @  response '. 'L  M  L  M  Unsatisfactory @ response '. 'L  M  L  M  No @ follow-up . response  received '  'L  M  L  M  Follow-up @ dialogue . ongoing  ...  <    <    <    <    <    <    <  Cameroon(3) &  &L  M  L  M  458/1991,L  M  MukongL  M      A/49/40L  M  # XXXXLq#X LXX X  ! L  M  # XXXX L#XXX XL  M  L  M    "    #    $    % L  M  L  M  X  & A/52/40   ' X   (    ( 630/1995,L  M  MazouL  M   l ) A/56/40   Z * L  M  L  M  X l + L  M  A/57/40   Z , L  M  L  M  X l - L  M  A/59/40   Z .   l /   l 0   l 1   (x 1 1134/2002,  2 L  M  Gorji-DinkaL  M   z3 A/60/40  h4    5    6    7 X   8 X   9 ...  ::   :;   :<   :=   :>   :?  :@  CEUS.,# XXXXM#XXX X# XXXXܜ#US.,CE.,  FA TRX3'LetterO'3Letter Landscape3'Letterreconstitutionoftheauthorscareer.Itwasop'3Letter LandscapeX3'T CCPR,A/62/40vol.I(2007)   ... t CHAPTERVI.FOLLOW-UPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL L  213.  InJuly1990,theCommitteeestablishedaprocedureforthemonitoringoffollow-uptoits $ t Viewsunderarticle5,paragraph4,oftheOptionalProtocol,andcreatedthemandateoftheSpecial  ` Rapporteurforfollow-uptoViewstothiseffect.Mr.AndohasbeentheSpecialRapporteursince  L  March2001(seventy-firstsession).  8  214.  In1991,theSpecialRapporteurbegantorequestfollow-upinformationfromStatesparties.   SuchinformationhasbeensystematicallyrequestedinrespectofallViewswithafindingofa   violationofCovenantrights;452Viewsoutofthe570Viewsadoptedsince1979concludedthat   therehadbeenaviolationoftheCovenant.   215.  Allattemptstocategorizefollow-uprepliesbyStatespartiesareinherentlyimpreciseand \ subjective:itaccordinglyisnotpossibletoprovideaneatstatisticalbreakdownoffollow-upreplies. H Manyfollow-uprepliesreceivedmaybeconsideredsatisfactory,inthattheydisplaythewillingness 4 oftheStatepartytoimplementtheCommitteesrecommendationsortoofferthecomplainantan  p appropriateremedy.Otherrepliescannotbeconsideredsatisfactorybecausetheyeitherdonot  \ addresstheCommitteesViewsatalloronlyrelatetocertainaspectsofthem.Somerepliessimply H notethatthevictimhasfiledaclaimforcompensationoutsidestatutorydeadlinesandthatno 4 compensationcanthereforebepaid.Stillotherrepliesindicatethatthereisnolegalobligationon   theStatepartytoprovidearemedy,butthataremedywillbeaffordedtothecomplainantonanex   gratiabasis.  216.  Theremainingfollow-upreplieschallengetheCommitteesViewsandfindingsonfactual  orlegalgrounds,constitutemuch-belatedsubmissionsonthemeritsofthecomplaint,promisean l investigationofthematterconsideredbytheCommitteeorindicatethattheStatepartywillnot,for X  onereasonoranother,giveeffecttotheCommitteesViews. D! 217.  Inmanycases,theCommitteesecretariathasalsoreceivedinformationfromcomplainants #l! totheeffectthattheCommitteesViewshavenotbeenimplemented.Conversely,inrareinstances, $X" thepetitionerhasinformedtheCommitteethattheStatepartyhadinfactgiveneffecttothe $D # Committeesrecommendations,eventhoughtheStatepartyhadnotitselfprovidedthatinformation. %0!$ 218.  Thepresentannualreportadoptsthesameformatforthepresentationoffollow-up '#& informationasthelastannualreport.Thetablebelowdisplaysacompletepictureoffollow-up (#' repliesfromStatespartiesreceivedupto7July2007,inrelationtoViewsinwhichtheCommittee )$( foundviolationsoftheCovenant.Whereverpossible,itindicateswhetherfollow-uprepliesareor |*%) havebeenconsideredassatisfactoryorunsatisfactory,intermsoftheircompliancewiththe h+&* CommitteesViews,orwhetherthedialoguebetweentheStatepartyandtheSpecialRapporteurfor T,'+ follow-uptoViewscontinues.TheNotesfollowinganumberofcaseentriesconveyanideaofthe @-(, difficultiesincategorizingfollow-upreplies.  219.  Follow-upinformationprovidedbyStatespartiesandbypetitionersortheirrepresentatives  subsequenttothelastannualreport(A/61/40,vol.I,chap.VI)issetoutinannexVIItovolumeII t ofthepresentannualreport. `   8  XRO'3Letter LandscapeX3'Letter'3Letter LandscapeX3'3'Letterreconstitutionoftheauthorscareer.ItwasopNX  FOLLOW-UPRECEIVEDTODATEFORALLCASESOFVIOLATIONSOFTHECOVENANT   *dddd dd  dd dd dd edd edd D..,/\R,\R,\R,\R,\R,f\R,\\+  8DDD'  8Statepartyand  numberofcases  withviolation =DDD,!rDDD =Communication  number,  authorandlocation =DDD,!rDDD =Follow-upresponse   receivedfromState   partyandlocation =DDD,!r DDD =Satisfactory   response =DDD,! DDD =Unsatisfactory  response =DDD,!DDD =Nofollow-up  response  received ?DDDD,!rDDD ?Follow-up  dialogue  ongoing SDDB,r  DDDD S... @DD/!t DD @ @DD/!t DD @ @DD/!t DD @ @DD/!t DD @ @DD/!t DD @ BDDD/!t DD B ND?'t  DDD NCameroon(4) 4DD#l D 4458/1991,Mukong l  A/49/40 4DD#Z DD 4 4DD#l  DD 4 4DD#l !DD 4 4DD#l "DD 4X l # A/52/40 6DDD#Z $DD 6X ED6l % DDD E 4DD#R &D 4630/1995,Mazou R ' A/56/40 4DD#@ (DD 4X R ) A/57/40 4DD#@ *DD 4X R + A/59/40 4DD#@ ,DD 4 4DD#R -DD 4 6DDD#R .DD 6 ED6R / DDD E 4DD#8 0D 41134/2002,Gorji-Dinka 8 1 A/60/40 4DD#&v 2DD 4 4DD#8 3DD 4 4DD#8 4DD 4 4DD#8 5DD 4X 8 6  6DDD#&v 7DD 6X ED68 8 DDD E 4DD#n 9D 41353/2005,Afuson n : A/62/40 4DD# \ ;DD 4Notyetdue 4DD#n <DD 4 4DD#n =DD 4 4DD#n >DD 4 6DDD#n ?DD 6 9DDD(n @ DDD 9... +DDT ADDD + +DDT BDD + +DDT CDD + +DDT DDD + +DDT EDD + -DDDT FDD -.$"T G  DDD .  LG TRX3'LetterO'3Letter Landscape3'Letterin T$! whichthecaseappears;annexIXre'3Letter LandscapeX3'TXXX X CCPR,CCPR/C/SR.2533(2008)   HumanRightsCommittee t Ninety-secondsession ` Summaryrecordofthe2533rdmeeting 8  HeldatHeadquarters,NewYork, $ t onWednesday,2April2008,at11a.m.  ` ...  8  ProgressreportoftheSpecialRapporteurforfollow-uponViews(CCPR/C/92/R.5) $  34Mr.Shearer(SpecialRapporteurforfollow-uponViews)introducedhisprogressreport   (CCPR/C/92/R.5),whichcompiledinformationreceivedsincetheninety-firstsessionofthe   Committee.   ... p 37.Ms.Chanet,referringtothecaseofGorji-GinkaFongumv.Cameroon(CommunicationNo. \ 1134/2002),saidthatthesecondsentenceofthesectionreferringtotheauthor'sresponsewasout H ofplaceandsuggestedthatitshouldbedeleted. 4 38.Mr.ShearersaidheagreedwithMs.Chanet'sproposedchange.  \ ... H 42.TherecommendationscontainedintheprogressreportoftheSpecialRapporteurfor 4 follow-uponViews,asamended,wereapproved.   Themeetingroseat1.05p.m.  # XXXXy#    CCPR,A/63/40vol.I(2008)    VI.  FOLLOW-UPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL  t 187.  InJuly1990,theCommitteeestablishedaprocedureforthemonitoringoffollow-uptoits L  Viewsunderarticle5,paragraph4,oftheOptionalProtocol,andcreatedthemandateoftheSpecial 8  Rapporteurforfollow-uptoViewstothiseffect.Mr.AndohasbeentheSpecialRapporteursince $ t March2001(seventy-firstsession).  ` 188.  In1991,theSpecialRapporteurbegantorequestfollow-upinformationfromStatesparties.  8  SuchinformationhadbeensystematicallyrequestedinrespectofallViewswithafindingofa $  violationofCovenantrights;429Viewsoutofthe547Viewsadoptedsince1979concludedthat   therehadbeenaviolationoftheCovenant.   189.  Allattemptstocategorizefollow-uprepliesbyStatespartiesareinherentlyimpreciseand   subjective:itaccordinglyisnotpossibletoprovideaneatstatisticalbreakdownoffollow-upreplies. p Manyfollow-uprepliesreceivedmaybeconsideredsatisfactory,inthattheydisplaythewillingness \ oftheStatepartytoimplementtheCommittee'srecommendationsortoofferthecomplainantan H appropriateremedy.Otherrepliescannotbeconsideredsatisfactorybecausetheyeitherdonot 4 addresstheCommittee'sViewsatallorrelateonlytocertainaspectsofthem.Somerepliessimply  p notethatthevictimhasfiledaclaimforcompensationoutsidestatutorydeadlinesandthatno  \ compensationcanthereforebepaid.Stillotherrepliesindicatethatthereisnolegalobligationon H theStatepartytoprovidearemedy,butthataremedywillbeaffordedtothecomplainantonanex 4 gratiabasis.   190.  Theremainingfollow-upreplieschallengetheCommittee'sViewsandfindingsonfactual  orlegalgrounds,constitutemuch-belatedsubmissionsonthemeritsofthecomplaint,promisean  investigationofthematterconsideredbytheCommitteeorindicatethattheStatepartywillnot,for  onereasonoranother,giveeffecttotheCommittee'srecommendations. l 191.  Inmanycases,theSecretariathasalsoreceivedinformationfromcomplainantstotheeffect D! thattheCommittee'sViewshavenotbeenimplemented.Conversely,inrareinstances,thepetitioner 0"  hasinformedtheCommitteethattheStatepartyhadinfactgiveneffecttotheCommittee's #l! recommendations,eventhoughtheStatepartyhadnotitselfprovidedthatinformation. $X" 192.  Thepresentannualreportadoptsthesameformatforthepresentationoffollow-up %0!$ informationasthelastannualreport.Thetablebelowdisplaysacompletepictureoffollow-up &"% repliesfromStatespartiesreceivedupto7July2008,inrelationtoViewsinwhichtheCommittee '#& foundviolationsoftheCovenant.Whereverpossible,itindicateswhetherfollow-uprepliesareor (#' havebeenconsideredassatisfactoryorunsatisfactory,intermsoftheircompliancewiththe )$( Committee'sViews,orwhetherthedialoguebetweentheStatepartyandtheSpecialRapporteurfor |*%) follow-uptoViewscontinues.Thenotesfollowinganumberofcaseentriesconveyanideaofthe h+&* difficultiesincategorizingfollow-upreplies. T,'+  @-(, 193.  Follow-upinformationprovidedbyStatespartiesandbypetitionersortheirrepresentatives  subsequenttothelastannualreport(A/62/40)issetoutinannexVIItovolumeIIofthepresent  annualreport.    t TRO'3Letter LandscapeX3'Letter'3Letter LandscapeL  M  Issuesandviol3'Letterin T$! whichthecaseappears;annexIXreT*Vdd/\R/\R\R\R\Rf\Rf\\..,vv, vv,Svv,vv,vv,vv,:vv+  /DDD GG/L  M  L  M  Statepartyandnumber G ofcaseswithviolation +DDD5DDD +Communicationnumber, G authorandrelevant 5 Committeereport +DDD#DDD +Followupresponse G receivedfromState 5 party +DDD#DDD +Satisfactory G  response +DDD5 DDD +Unsatisfactory G  response +DDD5 DDD +No G  response -DDDD5DDD -Followup G dialogue 5 ongoingL  M  CDD2## GG  DDDD GGC... +DDODD + +DDODD + +DDODD + +DDODD + +DDODD + -DDDODD - AD2#O GG  DDD GGAL  M  Cameroon(5) +DD D +458/1991,L  M  MukongL  M     A/49/40 +DD DD + +DD DD + +DD DD + +DD DD +X   A/52/40 -DDD  DD -XL  M  AD2# ! GG  DDD GGAL  M  +DD5 "D +630/1995,L  M  MazouL  M   5 # A/56/40 +DD# s$DD +X 5 % A/57/40 +DD# s&DD +X 5 ' A/59/40 +DD# s(DD + +DD5 )DD + -DDD5 *DD -L  M  AD2#5 + GG  DDD GGAL  M  +DD ,D +1134/2002,L  M  GorjiDinkaL  M    - A/60/40 +DD .DD + +DD /DD + +DD 0DD + +DD 1DD +X -DDD 2DD -XL  M  AD2# 3 GG  DDD GGAL  M  +DD Y 4D +1186/2003,L  M  TitiahongoL  M    Y 5 A/63/40 +DDG 6DD + +DD Y 7DD + +DD Y 8DD + +DD Y 9DD +X -DDD Y :DD -L  M  CDD2# Y ; GG  DDD GGCL  M  +DDs<DD +1353/2005,L  M  AfusonL  M   s= A/62/40 +DDa>DD + +DDs?DD + +DDs@DD + +DDsADD +X -DDDsBDD -L  M  CDD2#sC GG  DDD GGC... +DD-DDD + +DD-EDD + +DD-FDD + +DD-GDD + +DD-HDD + -DDD-IDD -3)'-J GG   DDD 3  bJ TRX3'LetterO'3Letter Landscape3'Letter63/40vol.I(2008)    '3Letter LandscapeL  M  IssuesandviolT CCPR,A/63/40,vol.II(2008)    AnnexVII  t  FOLLOWUPOFTHEHUMANRIGHTSCOMMITTEEONINDIVIDUAL L  COMMUNICATIONSUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOLTOTHEINTERNATIONAL 8  COVENANTONCIVILANDPOLITICALRIGHTS  $ t   ThisreportsetsoutallinformationprovidedbyStatespartiesandauthorsortheircounsel  L  sincethelastAnnualReport(A/62/40).  8  *:AdVdvv vv SvvSvvvvvv:vv:(#(#,vv,vv+  ($ $  vv(...  J   -#J  vv  vv-L  M  Stateparty  "r  L  M  CAMEROON L  M  -#"r  vv  vv-L  M  Case  J L  M  Gorji-GinkaFongum,1134/2002 L  M  -#J vv  vv-L  M  Viewsadoptedon  "  L  M  17March2005L  M  -#" vv  vv-L  M  Issuesandviolations  found    L  M  Conditionsofdetention,unlawfulandarbitraryarrest,righttoliberty  ofmovement,righttovoteandtobeelected-articles9,paragraph  1,10,paragraphs1and2(a),12,paragraph1,and25(b).L  M  -# vv  vv-L  M  Remedyrecommended  Z  L  M  Aneffectiveremedy,includingcompensationandassuranceofthe Z enjoymentofhiscivilandpoliticalrights.L  M  -#F vv  vv-L  M  DuedateforStateparty n response   Z  L  M  18July2005L  M  -#n vv  vv-L  M  Statepartyresponse  2  L  M  NoneL  M  -#2  vv  vv-L  M  Authorsresponse  ! !  L  M  On29February2008,theauthorinformedtheCommitteethatthe ! " Statepartyhadmadenoefforttoimplementitsdecisionand "# requestedtoknowwhatstepstheCommitteewouldtaketo #$ encouragetheStatepartytomeetitscommitments.L  M  -#~$% vv  vv-L  M  CommitteesDecision  V&!&  L  M  TheCommitteeconsidersthedialogueongoing.L  M  -#V&!' vv  vv-L  M  ...  .(~#( L  M  L  M  $.(~#) vv  $  |*%* XXX XCEUS., CCPR,A/64/40,vol.I(2009)    VI.  FOLLOWUPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL  t 230.  InJuly1990,theCommitteeestablishedaprocedureforthemonitoringoffollow-uptoits L  Viewsunderarticle5,paragraph4,oftheOptionalProtocol,andcreatedthemandateoftheSpecial 8  Rapporteurforfollow-uponViewstothiseffect.Ms.RuthWedgwoodhasbeentheSpecial $ t RapporteursinceJuly2009(ninety-sixthsession).  ` 231.  In1991,theSpecialRapporteurbegantorequestfollow-upinformationfromStatesparties.  8  SuchinformationhadbeensystematicallyrequestedinrespectofallViewswithafindingofa $  violationofCovenantrights;543Viewsoutofthe681Viewsadoptedsince1979concludedthat   therehadbeenaviolationoftheCovenant.   232.  Allattemptstocategorizefollow-uprepliesbyStatespartiesareinherentlyimpreciseand   subjective:itaccordinglyisnotpossibletoprovideaneatstatisticalbreakdownoffollow-upreplies. p Manyfollow-uprepliesreceivedmaybeconsideredsatisfactory,inthattheydisplaythewillingness \ oftheStatepartytoimplementtheCommittee'srecommendationsortoofferthecomplainantan H appropriateremedy.Otherrepliescannotbeconsideredsatisfactorybecausetheyeitherdonot 4 addresstheCommittee'sViewsatallorrelateonlytocertainaspectsofthem.Somerepliessimply  p notethatthevictimhasfiledaclaimforcompensationoutsidestatutorydeadlinesandthatno  \ compensationcanthereforebepaid.Stillotherrepliesindicatethatthereisnolegalobligationon H theStatepartytoprovidearemedy,butthataremedywillbeaffordedtothecomplainantonanex 4 gratiabasis.   233.  Theremainingfollow-upreplieschallengetheCommittee'sViewsandfindingsonfactual  orlegalgrounds,constitutemuchbelatedsubmissionsonthemeritsofthecomplaint,promisean  investigationofthematterconsideredbytheCommitteeorindicatethattheStatepartywillnot,for  onereasonoranother,giveeffecttotheCommittee'srecommendations. l 234.  Inmanycases,theSecretariathasalsoreceivedinformationfromcomplainantstotheeffect D! thattheCommittee'sViewshavenotbeenimplemented.Conversely,inrareinstances,thepetitioner 0"  hasinformedtheCommitteethattheStatepartyhadinfactgiveneffecttotheCommittee's #l! recommendations,eventhoughtheStatepartyhadnotitselfprovidedthatinformation. $X" 235.  Thepresentannualreportadoptsthesameformatforthepresentationoffollow-up %0!$ informationasthelastannualreport.Thetablebelowdisplaysacompletepictureoffollow-up &"% repliesfromStatespartiesreceiveduptotheninety-sixthsession(13-31July2009),inrelationto '#& ViewsinwhichtheCommitteefoundviolationsoftheCovenant.Whereverpossible,itindicates (#' whetherfollow-uprepliesareorhavebeenconsideredassatisfactoryorunsatisfactory,intermsof )$( theircompliancewiththeCommittee'sViews,orwhetherthedialoguebetweentheStatepartyand |*%) theSpecialRapporteurforfollow-uponViewscontinues.Thenotesfollowinganumberofcase h+&* entriesconveyanideaofthedifficultiesincategorizingfollow-upreplies. T,'+  @-(, 236.  Follow-upinformationprovidedbyStatespartiesandbypetitionersortheirrepresentatives  subsequenttothelastannualreport(A/63/40)issetoutinannexIXtovolumeIIofthepresent  annualreport.  ̀_  8  TRO'3Letter LandscapeX3'Letter'3Letter Landscape      3'Letter63/40vol.I(2008)    T*[d dvvvv:A..,vv,) vv,vv,vv,vv,#vv,vv+  /DDD vv/L  M  L  M  Statepartyandnumber d ofcaseswithviolation +DDDRDDD +CommunicationnumberL  M  ,L  M   d authorandrelevant R Committeereport +DDD@DDD +Followup d responsereceived R fromStateparty +DDD@ DDD +Satisfactory d  response +DDDR DDD +Unsatisfactory d  response +DDDR DDD +No d response -DDDDRDDD -Follow d up R dialogue @ ongoingL  M  CDD2#. vv  DDDD vvCL  M  ... +DD DD + +DD DD + +DD DD + +DD DD + +DD DD + -DDD DD - AD2#  vv  DDD vvAL  M  Cameroon(6) +DD D +458/1991L  M  ,L  M  ԀL  M  _ Mukong_ L  M     A/49/40 +DD DD + +DD DD + +DD DD + +DD  DD +X  ! A/52/40 -DDD "DD -XL  M  AD2# # vv  DDD vvAL  M  +DDZ $D +630/1995L  M  ,L  M  ԀL  M  _ Mazou_ L  M   Z % A/56/40 +DDH &DD +X Z ' A/57/40 +DDH (DD +X Z ) A/59/40 +DDH *DD + +DDZ +DD + -DDDZ ,DD -L  M  AD2#Z - vv  DDD vvAL  M  +DD"r .D +1134/2002L  M  ,L  M  ԀL  M  _ Gorji_ ԄDinkaL  M   "r / A/60/40 +DD`0DD + +DD"r 1DD + +DD"r 2DD + +DD"r 3DD +X -DDD"r 4DD -XL  M  AD2#"r 5 vv  DDD vvAL  M  +DD:6D +1186/2003L  M  ,L  M  ԀL  M  _ Titiahongo_ L  M   :7 A/63/40 +DD(8DD + +DD:9DD + +DD::DD + +DD:;DD +X -DDD:<DD -L  M  AD2#:= vv  DDD vvAL  M  +DD>D +1353/2005L  M  ,L  M  ԀL  M  _ Afuson_ L  M   ? A/62/40 +DD@DD + +DDADD + +DDBDD + +DDCDD +X -DDDDDD -L  M  CDD2#E vv  DDD vvCL  M  +DDzFDD +1397/2005L  M  ,L  M  ԀL  M  _ Engo_ L  M   zG L  M  A/64/40 +DDhHDD +Notyetdue +DDzIDD + +DDzJDD + +DDzKDD + -DDDzLDD -L  M  CDD2#zM vv  DDD vvC... +DDBNDD + +DDBODD + +DDBPDD + +DDBQDD + +DDBRDD + -DDDBSDD -3)'BT vv   DDD 3# XXXX#US.,CE.,8  U TRX3'LetterO'3Letter Landscape3'LetterDT DDD + +DDT E'3Letter Landscape      T@XXX X _ CCPR_ ,_ CCPR_ /C/SR.2712(2010)   HumanRightsCommittee t Ninetyeighthsession ` Summaryrecord(partial)ofthe2712thmeeting 8  HeldatHeadquarters,NewYork, $ t onThursday25March2010,at3pm  ` ...  8  L  M  L  M  FollowuponviewsundertheOptionalProtocol    L  M  ...   L  M  L  M  2.L  M  Ms._ Wedgwood_  L  M  ,speakingasSpecialRapporteurforfollowuponViewsundertheOptional p Protocol,introducedthefollowupprogressreport,whichincludedinformationreceivedsincethe ` Committees97thsession. L 3.ReferringtocaseNo.1297/2004(L  M   _ Medjnoune_ Ԁv.L  M  ԀL  M  Algeria L  M  ),sherecommendedthattheCommittee $t shouldpersuadetheStateparty,itselfanoutspokenmemberoftheHumanRightsCouncil,togive ` anindicationofwhentheauthorwouldbetried.IncasesNo.1178/2003and1553/2007involving L Belarus,whichdisputedtheCommitteesfindingsandthereforerefusedtoimplementitsViews,a 8 meetingwithStatepartyrepresentativeswouldbeproductive.WithrespecttocaseNo.1353/2005 $ (L  M   _ Afuson_ Ԁv.Cameroon L  M  ),theStatepartyhadclaimedthatithadattemptedtoprovidearemedybuthad  beenunabletoreachtheauthor.TheCommitteemightthereforeconsidersupplyingtheStateparty  withtheauthorsemailaddress,aslongasdoingsodidnotendangertheauthor.Turningtocase  No.1134/2002(L  M   _ Gorji_ ԄDinkav.Cameroon L  M  ),shenotedthattheStateparty,afterfailingtorespond  totheCommitteesthreerequestsforinformationwhilepreparingitsViews,nowwishedtosubmit p information.SherecommendedthattheCommitteeshouldenquireastowhatinformationcountry \  representativeswishedtocontribute,whilealsoremindingthemofStatespartiesobligationsunder H! theOptionalProtocol. 4"  # XXX@X㄃!#XXX X...  $\" # XXXXj,#@XXX X17.L  M  TherecommendationscontainedinthefollowupprogressreportoftheCommitteeonindividual %4!$ communicationswereapprovedL  M  .L  M   & "% Thediscussioncoveredinthesummaryrecordendedat3.40p.m.L  M   (#' # XXX@X,#@XXX X# XXX@Xa.#  *%) XXX X _ CCPR_ ,_ CCPR_ /C/SR.2738/Add.1(2010)   HumanRightsCommittee t Ninetyninthsession ` Summaryrecordofthesecondpart(public)ofthe2738thmeeting 8  Heldat_ Palais_ ԀWilson,Geneva, $ t onWednesday28July2010,at11:25am  ` ...  8  L  M  L  M  FollowuptoconcludingobservationsonStatereportsandtoViewsundertheOptional   Protocol    L  M  ...   L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  FollowupprogressreportonindividualcommunicationsL  M  (_ CCPR_ /C/99/R.3)L  M   \ L  M  74.L  M  Mr._ Iwasawa_ L  M  Ԁ introducedtheprogressreportonindividualcommunicationsonbehalfofMs. 4 _ Wedgwood_ ,SpecialRapporteurforFollowuponViews,whowasabsent. $t 75.Thefirstcase,No.1L  M  ,L  M  353/2005,concerningCameroonraisedissuesofphysicalandmental L torture,arbitrarydetention,freedomofexpression,securityofthepersonandtherighttoaremedy. 8 AccordingtotheStatepartysresponsetotheCommitteesViews,receivedinDecember2009, $ arrangementshadL  M  beenL  M  madetocompensatetheauthorbuttheStatepartyhadbeenunabletocontact  him.TheauthorhadinformedtheCommitteeinFebruary2010thathehadreceivednoredress.  Fearingforhissafety,hehadgoneintoexile.TheMinistryofForeignAffairshadinformedhimby  eL  M  ԄL  M  mailthataninterministerialcommitteemeetinghadrecommendedthatthecommitteeshould  arrangeameetingwithhim.Themeetinghadnevercomeaboutbecausehewasinexile. p 76.L  M  InApril2010,theauthorhadprovidedfurtherinformation,statingthathehadreceivedaletter H! fromtheMinisterforForeignAffairsinforminghimofameetingoftheMinistriesofJustice, 4"  TerritorialAdministrationandDecentralization,FinanceandForeignAffairsandtheGeneral  #p! DelegationforNationalSecurity,whichhadagreedtoproposecompensationofapproximately  $\" 56,000UnitedStatesdollars.Theauthorhadrequestedcompensationof930,000dollars,coverage $H # ofthecostofhismedicaltreatmentabroad,prosecutionoftheperpetratorsandactionbytheState %4!$ partytoensurehissecurity.TheStatepartyhadshownnoinclinationtoinitiatecriminal & "% proceedings.TheauthorssubmissionhadbeensenttotheStateparty.TheSpecialRapporteur ' #& proposedthattheCommitteeshouldconsiderthatthedialoguewasongoing. (#' 77.L  M  L  M  ItwassodecidedL  M  . *%)  D-(, # XXXXㄺ.#XXX X...  102.L  M  L  M  Thefollowupprogressreportonindividualcommunicationsasawhole,asamended,was  approved.L  M   t L  M  L  M  Themeetingroseat1p.m. L  # XXXX<#  8   A/65/40vol.I(2010)   ... t L  M  L  M  ChapterVI.FollowuponindividualcommunicationsundertheOptionalProtocol  L  L  M  L  M  202.ThepresentL  M  chapterL  M  ԀL  M  setsL  M  ԀoutallinformationprovidedbyStatespartiesandauthorsortheir $ t counselsincethelastannualreport(A/64/40).  ` ...  8  *,-d [dvv) vv) vvvvvv#vv#vv(#(#, dd ,cdd +      Stateparty $$t  $ Cameroon  $t   Case $  $L  M  UKUS.,L  M  _ Afuson_ Ԁ_ Njaru_ ,1353/2005 US.,UK.,B     Viewsadoptedon G=$t @39159@G19March2007 :0+$t @39159 @ : Issuesandviolations  found $ $L  M  L  M  L  M  UKUS.,L  M  Physicalandmentaltorture;arbitrarydetention;freedomof  expression;securityofthepersonandrighttoaremedyL  M  ԄL  M  Ԁarticles  7;9,paragraphs1and2;and19,paragraph2,inconjunctionwith | article2,paragraph3oftheCovenant.US.,UK.,vD h   T  Remedyrecommended $$ $L  M  L  M  L  M  UKUS.,L  M  Shouldensurethat:(a)criminalproceedingsareinitiatedseeking $ thepromptprosecutionandconvictionofthepersonsresponsible  fortheauthorL  M  L  M  sarrestandilltreatment;(b)theauthorisprotected  fromthreatsand/orintimidationfrommembersofthesecurity  forces;and_ (c)_ Ԁheisgrantedeffectivereparationincludingfull  compensation.US.,UK.,F p    \!  DuedateforStateparty  ," response G=!# @39143@G3March2007 :0+ ,$ @39143 @ : DateofStateparty H#% response G=4$& @@40162@@G16December2009 :0+H#' @@40162 @@ : Statepartyresponse $%!( $L  M  UKUS.,L  M  On16December2009,theStatepartyreportedthatarrangements %!) hadbeenmadetocompensatetheauthor,butdespiteefforts &!* made,theyhadnotbeenabletocontacthim.Nofurtherdetails '"+ wereprovided.US.,UK.,J x(#,   d)$-  AuthorL  M  L  M  scomments $*4&. $UKUS.,On25February2010,theauthorinformedtheCommitteethatthe *4&/ StatepartyhadfailedtoeffectivelyimplementtheViews.Despite + '0 US.,UK.,L  , (1  $d $ L  M  UKUS.,L  M  aninitiativetakenbytheNationalCommissiononHumanRights d andFreedoms(_ NCHRF_ ),theauthorhadnotbeenprovidedany P reparation.On29August2008,hemetwithamemberofthe < MinistryofForeignAffairs,afterwhichhesentheraproposalfor ( thepurposeofresolvinghiscase.Meanwhile,outoffearforhis  safety,theauthorwentintoexilein2008andwassubsequently   grantedpoliticalasyluminaEuropeancountry.Sincehisarrival   hehad_ had_ Ԁcontactbyemailwiththesamememberofthe    Ministry,whoinformedhim,on27April2009,thattherehad t   beenL  M  L  M  aseriesL  M  L  M  Ԁofinterministerialmeetingsconcerninghiscase, `   thelastofwhichrecommendedthat,L  M  L  M  theCommitteeshouldmeet L  with[theauthor]assoonaspossible,thatisinMay[2009]L  M  L  M  .It 8  wasunclear,accordingtotheauthor,whichCommitteewasbeing $t  referredtobutgiventhathewasnotinthecountryatthetimehe `  wouldnothavebeenabletoattend.HeneverreceivedanyUS.,UK.,NL  M  L  M  L  M  UKUS.,L  M  reply L  torequestsforclarification.Herequestedinteraliaameetingto 8 bearrangedwiththeSpecialRapporteurforfollowuponViews $ andtherepresentativesoftheStatepartytoensurepromptand  effectiveimplementation.US.,UK.,HT  L  M  UKUS.,L  M  On24April2010,theauthorprovidedthefollowingnew  information.Hestatedthathehadreceivedaletterfromthe p MinisterofExternalRelationsoftheStatepartyon14February \ 2010inhisEuropeancountryofexile.Accordingtothisletter,a H CommissioncomposedoftheMinistriesofJustice,Territorial 4 AdministrationandDecentralization,Finance,ExternalRelations  p andtheGeneralDelegationsofPolicehadheldameetingon17  \ February2009.Afterdeliberations,theCommissionL  M  L  M  proposed H [totheauthor]themaximumsumof30.000.000_ FCFA_ Ԁ(approx. 4 56,000_ USD_ )asallthedamagesincurredonyourpersoninorder   tocomeoutwithafinalconclusionthatwillputanendtothis    fileL  M  L  M  .US.,UK.,U !! UKUS.,Accordingtotheauthor,thedecisiontogranthimcompensation ## isapositivesignoftheStatepartyL  M  L  M  swillingnesstoresolvethe l$$ case.Nevertheless,suchapropositionisnotinaccordancewith X% % thedamagessufferedbytheauthor,giventhatheisstill D&!& undergoingmedicaltreatment,issufferingseverepaininhisleft 0'"' earandacutehearingdifficulties,aswellaspaininhisleftjaw, (l#( memorylapsesandinsomniaduetoposttraumaticstress )X$) disorder.ForthesereasonsL  M  ,interaliaL  M  ,theauthorrecallsthatthe )D%* Statepartyisunderanobligationtogranthimeffectivereparation *0&+ L  M  US.,UK.,eZUKUS.,includingfullcompensationL  M  Ԁfortheinjuriessuffered.TheStateUS.,UK.,] +', L  M  L  M  _   ,(-  $d $ UKUS.,partywasalreadyinformedin2008thatherequests:thathebe d granted500.000.000CFAfrancs(US$930,000)forthegeneral P andspecialdamageshesufferedbecauseoftheviolationsofhis < humanrights;thattheStatepartypayforhismedicaltreatment ( abroad;thattheperpetratorsbetriedincourtandpunished  accordingtothelaw;thatallotherthreatsagainsthimbyofficials   bepromptlyinvestigatedandperpetratorsbetriedincourt;and   thattheStateUS.,UK.,_ԀUKUS.,partyensurehissecurity.US.,UK.,a    L  M  UKUS.,L  M  HesubmitsthatthereisclearlynoindicationoftheStatepartyL  M  L  M  s `   intentiontoinitiatecriminalproceedingsseekingtheprompt L  investigation,prosecutionandconvictionoftheperpetrators,and 8  toprotecttheauthorfromthreatsand/orintimidationfrom $t  membersofthesecurityforces.Evensincetheadoptionofthe `  CommitteeL  M  L  M  sViewsin2007,theauthorclaimsthattheStateparty L  hasfailedtoprotecthimfromthreatsand/orintimidationfrom 8 membersofthesecurityforces.Forinstance,from2004until $ 2007,helodgedmorethan10complaintsagainstpoliceofficers  followingarbitraryarrests,detention,illtreatmentandafter  havingreceiveddeaththreatsfromsecurityforcesseveraltimes.  Toillustratethepersecutiontowhichhehasbeensubjected,the  authorcitesanumberofexamplesofviolationsofhishuman p rightswhichtookplacein2005,allofwhichwerereportedtothe \ judiciary,yetnoinvestigationshavebeencarriedoutandthe H perpetratorsstillUS.,UK.,bL  M  L  M  L  M  UKUS.,L  M  enjoyimpunity.US.,UK.,g 4    p  CommitteeL  M  L  M  sDecision $ $TheCommitteeconsidersthedialogueongoing.    $ p $      p  Case $   $L  M  UKUS.,L  M  _Gorji_ԄDinka,1134/2002 US.,UK.,i   !  Viewsadoptedon G= "p" `@38427`@G17March2005 :0+ "p# `@38427 `@ : Issuesandviolations #$ found $$% $L  M  L  M  L  M  UKUS.,L  M  Righttovoteandbeelected;libertyofmovement;arbitrary #& detention;inhumantreatment:segregationfromconvicted $' personsL  M  ԄL  M  Ԁarticles9,paragraph1;10,paragraphs1and2(a);12, x% ( paragraph1;and25(b)oftheCovenant.US.,UK.,|k d&!)   P'"*  Remedyrecommended $( $+ $L  M  L  M  L  M  UKUS.,L  M  Aneffectiveremedy,includingcompensationandassuranceof ( $, theenjoymentofhiscivilandpoliticalrights.US.,UK.,m ) %-   *%.  DuedateforStateparty (,x'/ response G=-d(0 @38550@G18July2005 :0+(,x'1 @38550 @ : DateofStateparty d  response G=P @@40162@@G16December2009 :0+d @@40162 @@ : Statepartyresponse $ $L  M  UKUS.,L  M  TheStatepartysubmitsthattheCommitteeL  M  L  M  sViewsweremade  withouthavingreceivedanyinformationfromtheStatepartyand l thusbasedsolelyoninformationprovidedbytheauthor.It X  acknowledgesthatitdidnotrespondtothethreeremindersfor D  informationfromtheSecretariatwithoutprovidingany 0   explanationwhy.US.,UK.,p  l     X   AuthorL  M  L  M  scomments $  $None     t   CommitteeL  M  L  M  sDecision $D  $TheCommitteeconsidersthedialogueongoing.  D   $t  $ t   _..._