WPC GDIA8LV=L/gز> en!G$v*8*J6vDj~^E%F1*vJjO~B>tj]i;34E#,8u6A^uߌ m8|85tsU 8*  {dG-Շp/o3=l ;w [zCZhA.gpmml $^z[h7)F?F)=(dEm'--q .dwq"AQ Gk+"0F oePp(4'$CCb~0K @ &3p E6FM4pۿHKPXbl֑lĬ%Bjώa~1dED3: ~&i.`:K]8#UN %' 0F- 0Us 0 0 0d 0 0 0} 0$ 0 0` 0 0 0 0> 0 0z 0 0 0% 0 0 0S 0 0 0- 0 0K 0N 0<^ YNewg4k m B B 0fafaHP PSC 2350 seriesTT0(  Z6Times New Roman RegularX(c$  CEUS.,*+ (_2623  ..*D+D (_25   ," <DL,23  ..," <DL,   *5+5 (_24  ) <DL)23  ..) <DL)  *2+2 (_23 ` &<<DL&23  ..&<<DL& ` */+/ (_22  #DL#23  ..#DL#  *,+, (_21   DL 23  .. DL  *)+) (_20 h DDL23  ..DDL h *&+& (_19  L23  ..L  *#+# (_18   L23  .. L  *>> (_17  2( 4 <DL223  Ԁ2( 4 <DL2  *DD (_16   ," <DL,23  Ԁ," <DL,   *55 (_15  ) <DL)23  Ԁ) <DL)  *22 (_14 ` &<<DL&23  Ԁ&<<DL& ` *// (_13  #DL#23  Ԁ#DL#  *,, (_12   DL 23  Ԁ DL  *)) (_11 h DDL23  ԀDDL h *&& (_10  L23  ԀL  (## &_9   L23  Ԁ L  (>> &_8  2( 4 <DL223  2( 4 <DL2  (DD &_7   ," <DL,23  ," <DL,   (55 &_6  ) <DL)23  ) <DL)  (22 &_5 ` &<<DL&23  &<<DL& ` (// &_4  #DL#23  #DL#  (,, &_3   DL 23   DL  ()) &_2 h DDL23  DDL h (&& &_1  L23  L  &## $_   L23   L  6 4heading 1     2( 4 <DL2  UK XXX       US   2( 4 <DL2  <:Default Para3sw3 d6Y3:i+003|xU  d[ [d0SS.header    ! UK XXX US    !  Table_ATABLE A c!  CEUS.,  _  4_XX GERMANY #X~X4_U#  I Follow-up-StateReporting  Ѐ_i_)ActionbyTreatyBodies,IncludingReportsonMissions    _CCPR_ԀA/59/40vol.I(2004)  t  CHAPTERVII.FOLLOWUPTOCONCLUDINGOBSERVATIONS L  ... $ t  260.ForallreportsofStatespartiesexaminedbytheCommitteeunderarticle40oftheCovenant `  overthelastyear,theCommitteehasidentified,accordingtoitsdevelopingpractice,alimited L  numberofpriorityconcerns,withrespecttowhichitseekstheStatepartysresponse,withinaperiod 8  ofayear,onthemeasurestakentogiveeffecttoitsrecommendations.TheCommitteewelcomes $  theextentanddepthofcooperationunderthisprocedurebyStatesparties,asmaybeobservedfrom   thefollowingcomprehensivetable.Ofthe27Statesparties(detailedbelow)thathavebeenbefore   theCommitteeunderthefollowupprocedureoverthelastyear,onlyone(RepublicofMoldova)  hasfailedtoprovideinformationatthelatestafterdispatchofareminder.TheCommitteereiterates  thatitviewsthisprocedureasaconstructivemechanismbywhichthedialogueinitiatedwiththe p examinationofareportcanbecontinued,andwhichservestosimplifytheprocessofthenext \ periodicreportonthepartoftheStateparty. H 261.ThetablebelowdetailstheexperienceoftheCommitteeoverthelastyear.Accordingly,it  p containsnoreferencetothoseStatespartieswithrespecttowhichtheCommittee,uponassessment  \ ofthefollowupresponsesprovidedtoit,decidedtotakenofurtheractionpriortotheperiod H coveredbythisreport. 4 *,- ddd Xdd Xdd X(#(#,RR,RR,RR, RR+  1'   1Stateparty    Dateinformation   due   Datereplyreceived    Furtheraction 5+    5... \ ! UKCE.,Eightiethsession(March2004) H!" ...CE.,UK.,  +!4"#  +Germany   #p$ 1April200[5]   #p% Є   #p& Є$ #p'   $  &!)  _CCPR_,A/60/40vol.I(2005)   CHAPTERVII.FOLLOWUPTOCONCLUDINGOBSERVATIONS t   ... L    233.ForallreportsofStatespartiesexaminedbytheCommitteeunderarticle40oftheCovenant $ t overthelastyear,theCommitteehasidentified,accordingtoitsdevelopingpractice,alimited  ` numberofpriorityconcerns,withrespecttowhichitseekstheStatepartysresponse,withinaperiod  L  ofayear,onthemeasurestakentogiveeffecttoitsrecommendations.TheCommitteewelcomes  8  theextentanddepthofcooperationunderthisprocedurebyStatesparties,asmaybeobservedfrom $  thecomprehensivetablepresentedbelow.Since18June2004,15Statesparties(Egypt,Germany,   Kenya,Latvia,Lithuania,Morocco,theNetherlands,thePhilippines,Portugal,theRussian   Federation,SerbiaandMontenegro,Slovakia,Sweden,TogoandVenezuela)havesubmitted   informationtotheCommitteeunderthefollowupprocedure.Sincethefollowupprocedurewas   institutedinMarch2001,onlysixStatesparties(Colombia,Israel,Mali,RepublicofMoldova,Sri p LankaandSuriname)havefailedtosupplyfollowupinformationthathadfallendue.The \ Committeereiteratesthatitviewsthisprocedureasaconstructivemechanismbywhichthedialogue H initiatedwiththeexaminationofareportcanbecontinued,andwhichservestosimplifytheprocess 4 ofthenextperiodicreportonthepartoftheStateparty.  p 224.ThetablebelowdetailstheexperienceoftheCommitteeoverthelastyear.Accordingly,it H containsnoreferencetothoseStatespartieswithrespecttowhichtheCommittee,uponassessment 4 ofthefollowupresponsesprovidedtoit,decidedtotakenofurtheractionpriortotheperiod   coveredbythisreport.   *6)7ddRRRRRR RR ,-(#(#,dd ,dd ,dd , dd +   StateParty '4 'DateInformation 4 Due '  'DateReply 4  Received ' ! 'FurtherAction +!4" +... P!# USCE.,Eightiethsession(April2004)CE.,US.,8 * <"$ *Germany '# %  '1April[2005] J@# &  @@38418@@ J8March2005 I?:# ' @@38418 @@  IUSCE.,Atitseightyfourthsession, # ( theCommitteedecidedto $) takenofurtheraction.CE.,US.,(% *   (  (#,  Follow-up-StateReporting  Ѐii)ActionbyStateParty   UKCE., _CCPR_Ԁ_CCPR_/CO/80/DEU/Add.1(2005)  t CommentsbytheGovernmentofGermanytotheConcludingObservationsoftheHumanRights L  Committee 8  [5January2005]  ` ResponsebytheGovernmentoftheFederalRepublicofGermanytoparagraph23firstsentenceof  8  theconcludingobservationsoftheUnitedNationsHumanRightsCommitteetothefifthperiodic $  reportofGermanyunderarticle40oftheInternationalCovenantonCivilandPoliticalRightsdated   30March2004(_CCPR_/CO/80/DEU)   Paragraph23firstsentenceoftheconcludingobservationsoftheUnitedNationsHumanRights   CommitteetothefifthperiodicreportofGermanyunderarticle40oftheInternationalCovenanton p CivilandPoliticalRightsdated30March2004(_CCPR_/CO/80/DEU)readsasfollows: \ "23.Inaccordancewitharticle70,paragraph5,oftheCommittee'srulesofprocedure,theStateparty 4 shouldprovide,withinoneyear,therelevantinformationontheimplementationoftheCommittee's  p recommendationsinparagraph11."  \ Paragraph11oftheconcludingobservationsreadsasfollows: 4 "11.TheCommitteenoteswithconcernthatGermanyhasnotyettakenapositionregardingthe   applicabilityoftheCovenanttopersonssubjecttoitsjurisdictioninsituationswhereitstroopsor  policeforcesoperateabroad,inparticularinthecontextofpeacemissions.Itreiteratesthatthe  applicabilityoftheregimeofinternationalhumanitarianlawdoesnotprecludeaccountabilityof  Statespartiesunderarticle2,paragraph1,oftheCovenantfortheactionsofitsagentsoutsidetheir l ownterritories. X  0  TheStatepartyisencouragedtoclarifyitspositionandtoprovidetrainingonrelevantrights 0"  containedintheCovenantspecificallydesignedformembersofitssecurityforcesdeployed #l! internationally."$X"(#(# ЀStatementbytheFederalGovernment: %0!$ PursuanttoArticle2,paragraph1,GermanyensurestherightsrecognizedintheCovenanttoall '#& individualswithinitsterritoryandsubjecttoitsjurisdiction. (#' Whereveritspoliceorarmedforcesaredeployedabroad,inparticularwhenparticipatinginpeace )$( missions,Germanyensurestoallpersonsthattheywillbegrantedtherightsrecognizedinthe |*%) Covenant,insofarastheyaresubjecttoitsjurisdiction. h+&* Germany'sinternationaldutiesandobligations,inparticularthoseassumedinfulfilmentof T,'+ obligationsstemmingfromtheCharteroftheUnitedNations,remainunaffected. @-(, _Thetrainingitgivesitssecurityforcesforinternationalmissionsincludestailor-madeinstructionin  theprovisionsoftheCovenant.CE.,UK.,