WPC?  $D!e" V*HsdI/cg!]6\1wInŪaYu?-֍l/ƕ_rN{: z1 2a@4k^*˒V|E]CDRֻ2 81GUz{iY%H0]u~F(mAD8EGq`Q;rKU?o6>&ShiYJBcT9&!G(vQo zw`{]f@Ւ΄:Ng4ùEq=Uq_ U [ UB{ N ^ w 4   m DE U>P f a f a 0 - f a f a B- B" 0(hH  Z6Times New Roman RegularX($UKUS.,\  `&Times New Roman \  `*Times New RomanTTp8 p8rtyBar3|xU88889Hairline!dxdx\  `&Times New RomanhTABLE APTABLE B<SS:Footnote TexS\  `&Times New RomanSS\  `&Times New RomanS ##Xd#Table_ATABLE A)Hairline d d !UKUS.,  _ USUK.,|8XX  PANAMA#XaX|8R#  qFollowupJurisprudence    ActionbyTreatyBodies  CCPRA/51/40,vol.I(1996)    VIII.FOLLOW-UPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL   ...    429.Acountry-by-countrybreakdownoffollow-uprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstandingasat   26July1996providesthefollowingpicture:   ...   Panama:Twoviewsfindingviolations;nofollow-upreplyreceivedfromtheStateparty.Areminder v addressedtotheStatepartyinrespectofthefirstdecisionon9December1994. p ... d Concernoverinstancesofnon-cooperationunderthefollow-upmandate X 463.Inspiteoftheprogressincollectingfollow-upinformationsincetheadoptionofthelastannualreport, L theCommitteeandtheSpecialRapporteurnotewithconcernthatanumberofcountriesdidnotprovide F anyfollow-upinformationwithinthedeadlinesestablishedbytheCommitteeorhavenotrepliedto @ remindersorrequestsforinformationfromtheSpecialRapporteur.TheStatesthathavenotrepliedto : requestsforfollow-upinformationarethefollowing: 4 ... (!x Panama(noreplyinrespectoftwocases); #l ... %` ! 464.TheSpecialRapporteururgestheseStatespartiestoreplytohisrequestsforfollow-upinformation 'T"# withintheimparteddeadlines. 'N#$   (H$%  CCPRA/52/40,vol.I(1997)   VIII.FOLLOW-UPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL  ...  524.Acountry-by-countrybreakdownoffollow-uprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstandingasof   30June1997providesthefollowingpicture(Viewsinwhichthedeadlineforreceiptoffollow-up   informationhadnotyetexpiredhavenotbeenincluded):   ... t  Panama:TwoViewsfindingviolations:289/1988-DieterWolf(1992Report);4/473/1991-Barroso h  (1995Report).16/Statepartyfollow-upreplyremainsoutstanding,inspiteofreminderaddressedtoit. b  Follow-upconsultationsweretobeheldduringthesixtiethsession. \  ... P Concernoverinstancesofnon-cooperationunderthefollow-upmandate D 554.Inspiteofsomeprogressincollectingfollow-upinformationsincetheadoptionofits1996Report, 8 theCommitteeandtheSpecialRapporteurnotewithconcernthatanumberofcountriesdidnotprovide 2 anyfollow-upinformationwithinthedeadlinesestablishedbytheCommitteeorhavenotrepliedto ,| remindersorrequestsforinformationfromtheSpecialRapporteur.ThoseStateswhichhavenotreplied &v torequestsforfollow-upinformationarethefollowing(inalphabeticalorder):  p ... d Panama:twocases;  X ... !L 555.TheCommitteeurgesthoseStatespartiestoreplytotheSpecialRapporteur'srequestsforfollow-up #@  informationwithinthedeadlinesthathavebeenset. $: !    `     h _________ +'(   4/OfficialRecordsoftheGeneralAssembly,FortyseventhSession,SupplementNo.40 , () (A/47/40). -)*   16/Ibid.,FiftiethSession,SupplementNo.40(A/50/40).   CCPRA/53/40,vol.I(1998)   VIII.FOLLOW-UPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL  486.TheCommittee'spreviousreport(A/52/40)containedadetailedcountry-by-countrybreakdownof   follow-uprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstandingasof30June1997.Thelistthatfollowsshows   theadditionalcasesinrespectofwhichfollow-upinformationhasbeenrequestedfromStates(Viewsin   whichthedeadlineforreceiptoffollow-upinformationhadnotyetexpiredhavenotbeenincluded).Italso z   indicatesthosecasesinwhichrepliesareoutstanding.Inmanyofthesecasestherehasbeennochange t  sincethepreviousreport.ThisisbecausetheresourcesavailablefortheCommittee'sworkwere n  considerablyreducedinthecurrentyear,preventingitfromundertakingacomprehensivesystematic h  follow-upprogramme. b  ... V Panama:TwoViewsfindingviolations:289/1988-DieterWolf(1992Report(A/47/40));473/1991- J Barroso(1995Report(A/50/40)).Stateparty'sfollow-upreply,dated22September1997(seeparas. D 496and497below). > ... 2 OverviewoffollowuprepliesreceivedandoftheSpecialRapporteursfollowupconsultationsduringthe &v reportingperiod  p ... d 496.Panama.Bysubmissionof22September1997,Panamaprovidedinformationinrespectofthe  X Committee'sViewsincasesNos.289/1988(Wolf)and473/1991(DelCid).Withregardtothecaseof !R Mr.Wolf,theStatepartyexplainsthefactualsituationandrecallsthatatthetimethepenalprocesswas !L entirelyawrittenprocedure,butthatin1990thelawhadbeenamendedinordertoreincorporateoral "F proceedings,publichearingsandtheguaranteeofpublicdefenceforthosewhohavenosufficientmeans #@  topayforit.InrelationtotherecommendationoftheCommitteetopaycompensation,theStateparty $: ! notesthatthelawrequiresthefixationoftheamountandthespecificationofthedamagescaused.Itisnot %4!" clearfromtheStateparty'sobservationswhetherMr.Wolfwouldberequiredtostartacourtactionin &."# ordertoobtainthesaidcompensation. '(#$ 497.WithregardtothecaseofMr.DelCid,theStatepartystatesthatitacceptsthelegalconsequences )%& ofhavingratifiedtheCovenantandtheOptionalProtocolthereto,butrecallsthatthecriminaljusticesystem *&' suffersfromfinancialpressurescausedbytheState'sforeigndebt,whichhinderstheestablishmentofmore +'( tribunals,whereastheincreaseofcriminalityleadstooverpopulationofprisons.AccordingtotheState , () party,takingintoaccounttheactualsituation,thethreeyearsittooktobringMr.DelCid'scasetotrialare -)* thusjustified.TheStatepartynotesthatMr.DelCidwasassistedbyspecialistlawyersduringhistrial,and  thattheselawyersshouldinitiateactionstoclaimthecompensationrecommendedbytheCommittee.In  thiscontext,theStatepartyreferstoarticles1033and1034oftheJudicialCode,andtoarticle178of  LawNo.65of24December1996,concerningcourtordersforcompensation.  ...   507.TheCommitteedecidedthatinviewoftherepliesreceived,furtherfollow-upconsultationsare   requiredinrespectof...Panama...   ... t    n   CCPRA/54/40,vol.I(1999)   VII.FOLLOW-UPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL  461.TheCommittee'spreviousreport(A/53/40)containedadetailedcountry-by-countrybreakdown  offollow-uprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstandingasof30June1998.Thelistthatfollowsshows   theadditionalcasesinrespectofwhichfollow-upinformationhasbeenrequestedfromStates(Viewsin   whichthedeadlineforreceiptoffollow-upinformationhadnotyetexpiredhavenotbeenincluded).Italso   indicatesthosecasesinwhichrepliesareoutstanding.Inmanyofthesecasestherehasbeennochange   sincethelastreport.ThisisbecausetheresourcesavailablefortheCommittee'sworkhavebeen z   considerablyreducedpreventingitfromundertakingacomprehensivesystematicfollow-upprogramme. t  ... h  Panama:TwoViewsfindingviolations:289/1988-Wolf(A/47/40);473/1991-Barroso(A/50/40).For \  Stateparty'sfollow-upreply,dated22September1997,seeA/53/40,paras.496and497. V   P  CCPRA/55/40,vol.I(2000)   UK.,US.,@!XaXXXa  XaXXXam%  VI.FOLLOWUPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOLm%%݌  ЌXaXXXaXaXXXa  #XaXXXa%#XaXXXa...  #XaXXXa&#XaXXXa596.TheCommitteespreviousreport(A/54/40)containedadetailedcountrybycountrybreakdownof   followuprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstandingasof30June1999.Thelistthatfollowsshows   theadditionalcasesinrespectofwhichfollowupinformationhasbeenrequestedfromStates.(Viewsin   whichthedeadlineforreceiptoffollowupinformationhadnotyetexpiredhavenotbeenincluded.)Italso z   indicatesthosecasesinwhichrepliesareoutstanding.Inmanyofthesecasestherehasbeennochange t  sincethelastreport.ThisisbecausethelimitedresourcesavailablefortheCommitteesworkpreventit n  fromundertakingacomprehensiveorsystematicfollowupprogramme. h  ... \  #XaXXXa'#XaXXXaPanama:TwoViewsfindingviolations:289/1988Wolf(A/47/40);473/1991Barroso(A/50/40).For P theStatepartysfollowupreplies,dated22September1997,seeA/53/40,paras.496and497.#XaXXXa*#XaXXXaUSUK., J   > ! !8aXXdd8 !  CCPRA/56/40,vol.I(2001)   #XaXXXa+#XaXXXaUK.,US.,+ChapterIV.FollowupActivitiesundertheOptionalProtocol#XaXXXa-#XaXXXa    ...  180.TheCommitteespreviousannualreport(A/55/40,vol.I,chap.VI)containedadetailedcountryby   countrysurveyonfollowuprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstandingasof30June2000.Thelist   thatfollowsupdatesthatsurvey,indicatingthosecasesinwhichrepliesareoutstanding,butdoesnottake   intoaccounttheCommitteesViewsadoptedduringtheseventysecondsession,forwhichfollowup z   repliesarenotyetdue.Inmanycasestherehasbeennochangesincethepreviousreport. t  ... h  Panama:TwoViewsfindingviolations:289/1988Wolf(A/47/40);473/1991Barroso(A/50/40).For \  followupreplies,dated22September1997,seeA/53/40,paragraphs496and497.#XaXXXa-#USUK., V UK.,US.,r1  >  XaXXXaCCPRA/57/40,vol.I(2002)     ChapterVI.Followupactivitiesundertheoptionalprotocol  ...  228.ThepreviousannualreportoftheCommittee(A/56/40,vol.I,chap.VI)containedadetailed   countrybycountrysurveyoffollowuprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstandingasof30June2001.   Thelistthatfollowsupdatesthatsurvey,indicatingthosecasesinwhichrepliesareoutstanding,butdoes   notincluderesponsesconcerningtheCommitteesViewsadoptedduringtheseventyfourthandseventy z   fifthsessions,forwhichfollowuprepliesarenotyetdue.Inmanycasestherehasbeennochangesince t  thepreviousreport. n  ... b  Panama:Viewsintwocaseswithfindingsofviolations: V 289/1988Wolf(A/47/40); J 473/1991Barroso(A/50/40).Forfollowupreplies,dated22September1997,seeA/53/40, > paragraphs496and497. 8 ... ,| 229.ForfurtherinformationonthestatusofalltheViewsinwhichfollowupinformationremains  p outstandingorinrespectofwhichfollowupconsultationshavebeenorwillbescheduled,referenceis j madetothefollowupprogressreportpreparedfortheseventy-fourthsessionoftheCommittee d (CCPR/C/74/R.7/Rev.1,dated28March2002),discussedinpublicsessionattheCommittees2009th ^ meetingon4April2002(CCPR/C/SR.2009).ReferenceisalsomadetotheCommitteesprevious  X reports,inparticularA/56/40,paragraphs182to200. !R #XaXXXa1#  !L  XaXXXaCEUK.,CCPRA/58/40,vol.I(2003)   CHAPTERVI.FollowupactivitiesundertheOptionalProtocol  ...  223.ThepreviousannualreportoftheCommittee1containedadetailedcountrybycountrysurveyof   followuprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstandingasof30June2002.Thelistthatfollowsupdates   thatsurvey,indicatingthosecasesinwhichrepliesareoutstanding,butdoesnotincluderesponses   concerningtheCommitteesViewsadoptedduringtheseventyseventhandseventyeighthsessions,for z   whichfollowuprepliesarenotyetdueinthemajorityofcases.Inmanycasestherehasbeennochange t  sincethepreviousreport.* n  ... b  Panama: ` 0 Viewsintwocaseswithfindingsofviolations:V (# (# 0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#289/1988Wolf(A/47/40);J (# (# 0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#473/1991Barroso(A/50/40).Forfollowupreplies,dated22September > 1997,seeA/53/40,paragraphs496and497.8 (# (# Notes ,| 1.[OfficialRecordsoftheGeneralAssembly],FiftyseventhSession,SupplementNo.40(A/57/40),  p vol.I,chap.VI. j *ThedocumentsymbolA/[SessionNo.]/40referstotheOfficialRecordoftheGeneralAssembly ^ inwhichthecaseappears;annexVIreferstothepresentreport,vol.II.  X #XaXXXa9#UK.,CE.,9  !L XaXXXaCEUK., CCPRA/59/40vol.I(2004)   CHAPTERVI.FOLLOWUPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL  ...  230.ThepreviousannualreportoftheCommittee1containedadetailedcountry-by-countrysurveyof   followuprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstandingasof30June2003.Thelistthatfollowsupdates   thatsurvey,indicatingthosecasesinwhichrepliesareoutstanding,butdoesnotincluderesponses   concerningtheCommitteesViewsadoptedduringtheeightiethandeightyfirstsessions,forwhichfollow z   uprepliesarenotyetdueinthemajorityofcases.Inmanycasestherehasbeennochangesincethe t  previousreport.* n  ... b  UK.,CE.,@USUK.,*34 ddd Xdd Xdd X(#(#,UU,UU+  1'VV 1UK.,US.,DPanama:USUK., 'V 'Viewsintwocaseswithfindingsofviolations: 6,V  6 'h '289/1988Wolf(A/47/40); 6,h  6 '* '473/1991Barroso(A/50/40).Forfollowupreplies,dated * 22September1997,seeA/53/40,paragraphs496and497.UK.,US.,EUSUK.,$$   $UK.,US.,GCEUK.,_______________  Notes  1/Ibid.,FiftyeighthSession,SupplementNo.40(A/58/40),vol.I,chap.VI. ~ *ThedocumentsymbolA/[sessionNo.]/40referstotheOfficialRecordsoftheGeneralAssemblyin r whichthecaseappears;annexIXreferstothepresentreport,volumeII. l  #XaXXXa@#UK.,CE.,G  Z#  XaXXXaCEUK., CCPR,A/60/40vol.I(2005)   ...  CHAPTERVI.FOLLOWUPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL   224.InJuly1990,theCommitteeestablishedaprocedureforthemonitoringoffollowuptoitsViews   underarticle5,paragraph4,oftheOptionalProtocol,andcreatedthemandateoftheSpecialRapporteur   forthefollowuponViewstothiseffect.Mr.AndohasbeentheSpecialRapporteursinceMarch2001 z   (seventyfirstsession). t  225.In1991,theSpecialRapporteurbegantorequestfollowupinformationfromStatesparties.Such h  informationhasbeensystematicallyrequestedinrespectofallViewswithafindingofaviolationof b  Covenantrights.Atotalof391Viewsoutofthe503Viewsadoptedsince1979concludedthattherehad \  beenaviolationoftheCovenant. V 228.Inmanycases,theSecretariathasalsoreceivedinformationfromcomplainantstotheeffectthatthe J CommitteesViewshavenotbeenimplemented.Conversely,inrareinstances,thepetitionerhasinformed D theCommitteethattheStatepartyhasinfactgiveneffecttotheCommitteesrecommendations,even > thoughtheStatepartydidnotitselfprovidethatinformation. 8 229.Thepresentannualreportadoptsadifferentformatforthepresentationoffollowupinformation ,| comparedtopreviousannualreports.Thetablebelowdisplaysacompletepictureoffollowupreplies &v fromStatespartiesreceivedasof28July2005,inrelationtoViewsinwhichtheCommitteefound  p violationsoftheCovenant.Whereverpossible,itindicateswhetherfollowuprepliesareorhavebeen j consideredassatisfactoryorunsatisfactory,intermsofcomplyingwiththeCommitteesViews,orwhether d thedialoguebetweentheStatepartyandtheSpecialRapporteurforfollowuponViewscontinues.The ^ notesfollowinganumberofcaseentriesconveyanideaofthedifficultiesincategorizingfollowupreplies.  X 230.FollowupinformationprovidedbyStatespartiesandbypetitionersortheirrepresentativessince !L thelastannualreportissetoutinanewannexVII,containedinVolumeIIofthepresentannualreport. "F This,moredetailed,followupinformationalsoindicatesactionstilloutstandinginthosecasesthatremain #@  underreview. $: ! _  '(#$ TRO'3#Avery 12-294/295 Laser Ta LandscapeX3' Letter'3Letter LandscapeLaser Ta Landscape3'LetterT   FOLLOWUPRECEIVEDTODATEFORALLCASESOFVIOLATIONSOFTHECOVENANT   cV*6D7ed dUUUU34..,'bZ,4bZ, bZ,'bZ,bZ,bZ,bb+  6DD' @6XXa#I#UK.,CE.,JStatepartyand  numberofcases o withviolation#X#CEUK., ;DD,!8 @DD @;#OY#UK.,CE.,nYCommunicationnumber,  authorand_locationa_#Y#CEUK., ;DD,!o@DD @;  #Z#UK.,CE.,ZFollowupresponsereceivedfrom   Statepartyandlocation#9[#CEUK., ;DD,!o @DD @;Satisfactory   response ;DD,!o @DD @;Unsatisfactory   response ;DD,!o@DD @;Nofollowup  response ?DDD,!o@DD @?Followup  dialogue o ongoing IDD:'8 @  DDD @I... ;DD,! a@DD @; ;DD,! a@DD @; ;DD,! a@DD @; ;DD,! a@DD @; ;DD,! a@DD @; ?DDD,! a@DD @? NDD?' a@  DDD @NPanama(2) ;DD,! :@DD @;289/1988,Wolf  : A/47/40 ;DD,! @DD @;X  : A/53/40 ;DD,! @DD @; ;DD,! : @DD @; ;DD,! :!@DD @; ?DDD,! :"@DD @?X PDDD?' :#@  DDD @P =DDD,! $@DDD @=473/1991,Barroso  % A/50/40 =DDD,!U &@DDD @=X  ' A/53/40 =DDD,!U (@DDD @= =DDD,! )@DDD @= =DDD,! *@DDD @= ?DDDD,! +@DDD @?X7-+ ,@   DDDD 7#XaX[X#aThelocationreferstothedocumentsymboloftheOfficialRecordsoftheGeneralAssembly,SupplementNo.40,whichistheannualreport  p - oftheCommitteetotherespectivesessionsoftheAssembly. j . #XaXXXa[#UK.,CE.,\  X1 TRX3'LetterO'3#Avery 12-294/295 Laser Ta Landscape3'LetterscapeX3''3Letter LandscapeLaser Ta LandscapeT _CCPR_,A/61/40vol.I(2006)   ...  L  M  L  M  CHAPTERVI_FOLLOW-UP_ԀACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL   227.InJuly1990,theCommitteeestablishedaprocedureforthemonitoringoffollow-uptoitsViews   underarticle5,paragraph4,oftheOptionalProtocol,andcreatedthemandateoftheSpecialRapporteur   forfollow-uptoViewstothiseffect.Mr.AndohasbeentheSpecialRapporteursinceMarch2001 z   (seventy-firstsession). t  228.In1991,theSpecialRapporteurbegantorequestfollow-upinformationfromStatesparties.Such h  informationhasbeensystematicallyrequestedinrespectofallViewswithafindingofaviolationof b  Covenantrights;429Viewsoutofthe547Viewsadoptedsince1979concludedthattherehadbeena \  violationoftheCovenant. V 229.Allattemptstocategorizefollow-uprepliesbyStatespartiesareinherentlyimpreciseandsubjective: J itaccordinglyisnotpossibletoprovideaneatstatisticalbreakdownoffollow-upreplies.Manyfollow-up D repliesreceivedmaybeconsideredsatisfactory,inthattheydisplaythewillingnessoftheStatepartyto > implementtheCommitteesrecommendationsortoofferthecomplainantanappropriateremedy.Other 8 repliescannotbeconsideredsatisfactorybecausetheyeitherdonotaddresstheCommitteesViewsatall 2 oronlyrelatetocertainaspectsofthem.Somerepliessimplynotethatthevictimhasfiledaclaimfor ,| compensationoutsidestatutorydeadlinesandthatnocompensationcanthereforebepaid.Stillother &v repliesindicatethatthereisnolegalobligationontheStatepartytoprovidearemedy,butthataremedy  p willbeaffordedtothecomplainantonanL  M  exgratiaL  M  Ԁbasis. j 230.Theremainingfollow-upreplieschallengetheCommitteesViewsandfindingsonfactualorlegal ^ grounds,constitutemuch-belatedsubmissionsonthemeritsofthecomplaint,promiseaninvestigationof  X thematterconsideredbytheCommitteeorindicatethattheStatepartywillnot,foronereasonoranother, !R giveeffecttotheCommitteesViews. !L 231.Inmanycases,theSecretariathasalsoreceivedinformationfromcomplainantstotheeffectthatthe #@  CommitteesViewshavenotbeenimplemented.Conversely,inrareinstances,thepetitionerhasinformed $: ! theCommitteethattheStatepartyhadinfactgiveneffecttotheCommitteesrecommendations,even %4!" thoughtheStatepartyhadnotitselfprovidedthatinformation. &."# 232.Thepresentannualreportadoptsthesameformatforthepresentationoffollow-upinformationas ("$% thelastannualreport.Thetablebelowdisplaysacompletepictureoffollow-uprepliesfromStatesparties )%& receivedupto7July2006,inrelationtoViewsinwhichtheCommitteefoundviolationsoftheCovenant. *&' Whereverpossible,itindicateswhetherfollow-uprepliesareorhavebeenconsideredassatisfactoryor +'( unsatisfactory,intermsoftheircompliancewiththeCommitteesViews,orwhetherthedialoguebetween , () theStatepartyandtheSpecialRapporteurforfollow-uptoViewscontinues.TheNotesfollowinga -)* numberofcaseentriesconveyanideaofthedifficultiesincategorizingfollow-upreplies.  233.  Follow-upinformationprovidedbyStatespartiesandbypetitionersortheirrepresentatives  subsequenttothelastannualreport(A/60/40,vol.I,chap.VI)issetoutinannexVIItovolumeIIofthe  presentannualreport.   TRO'3Letter LandscapeX3'Letter'3Letter LandscapeX3'3'LetterscapeX3'TL  M  L  M  FOLLOW-UPRECEIVEDTODATEFORALLCASESOFVIOLATIONSOFTHECOVENANT   *Dded'bZ'4bZ4 bZ 'bZ'bZbZbb6D7..,dd ,dd , dd ,dd ,dd ,edd ,dd +  $ $Stateparty R andnumber L ofcaseswith  F violation ' @ 'L  M  L  M  Communication R number,authorand L  location ' F  'L  M  L  M  Follow-upresponse R  receivedfromStateparty L  andlocation ' F  'L  M  L  M  Satisfactory R response 'L 'L  M  L  M  Unsatisfactory R response 'L 'L  M  L  M  No R follow-up L response  F received ' @ 'L  M  L  M  Follow-up R dialogue L ongoing  F ...  ~    ~    ~    ~    ~    ~    ~  Panama(2) & \  &L  M  L  M  289/1988,L  M  WolfL  M    \ ! A/47/40L  M   V " L  M  L  M  X  \ # A/53/40  V $    \ %    \ &    \ ' X   \ (   0 ( 473/1991,L  M  BarrosoL  M    ) A/50/40   * L  M  L  M  X  + L  M  A/53/40   ,    -    .    / X   0 ...  l1   l2   l3   l4   l5   l6  l7    F7 TRX3'LetterO'3Letter Landscape3'LetterL  461.TheCommittee'spreviousrepo'3Letter LandscapeX3'T _CCPR_,A/62/40vol.I(2007)   ...  CHAPTERVI.FOLLOW-UPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL   213.  InJuly1990,theCommitteeestablishedaprocedureforthemonitoringoffollow-uptoitsViews   underarticle5,paragraph4,oftheOptionalProtocol,andcreatedthemandateoftheSpecialRapporteur   forfollow-uptoViewstothiseffect.Mr.AndohasbeentheSpecialRapporteursinceMarch2001 z   (seventy-firstsession). t  214.  In1991,theSpecialRapporteurbegantorequestfollow-upinformationfromStatesparties.Such h  informationhasbeensystematicallyrequestedinrespectofallViewswithafindingofaviolationof b  Covenantrights;452Viewsoutofthe570Viewsadoptedsince1979concludedthattherehadbeena \  violationoftheCovenant. V 215.  Allattemptstocategorizefollow-uprepliesbyStatespartiesareinherentlyimpreciseand J subjective:itaccordinglyisnotpossibletoprovideaneatstatisticalbreakdownoffollow-upreplies.Many D follow-uprepliesreceivedmaybeconsideredsatisfactory,inthattheydisplaythewillingnessoftheState > partytoimplementtheCommitteesrecommendationsortoofferthecomplainantanappropriateremedy. 8 OtherrepliescannotbeconsideredsatisfactorybecausetheyeitherdonotaddresstheCommitteesViews 2 atalloronlyrelatetocertainaspectsofthem.Somerepliessimplynotethatthevictimhasfiledaclaimfor ,| compensationoutsidestatutorydeadlinesandthatnocompensationcanthereforebepaid.Stillotherreplies &v indicatethatthereisnolegalobligationontheStatepartytoprovidearemedy,butthataremedywillbe  p affordedtothecomplainantonanexgratiabasis. j 216.  Theremainingfollow-upreplieschallengetheCommitteesViewsandfindingsonfactualorlegal ^ grounds,constitutemuch-belatedsubmissionsonthemeritsofthecomplaint,promiseaninvestigationof  X thematterconsideredbytheCommitteeorindicatethattheStatepartywillnot,foronereasonoranother, !R giveeffecttotheCommitteesViews. !L 217.  Inmanycases,theCommitteesecretariathasalsoreceivedinformationfromcomplainantstothe #@  effectthattheCommitteesViewshavenotbeenimplemented.Conversely,inrareinstances,thepetitioner $: ! hasinformedtheCommitteethattheStatepartyhadinfactgiveneffecttotheCommittees %4!" recommendations,eventhoughtheStatepartyhadnotitselfprovidedthatinformation. &."# 218.  Thepresentannualreportadoptsthesameformatforthepresentationoffollow-upinformationas ("$% thelastannualreport.Thetablebelowdisplaysacompletepictureoffollow-uprepliesfromStatesparties )%& receivedupto7July2007,inrelationtoViewsinwhichtheCommitteefoundviolationsoftheCovenant. *&' Whereverpossible,itindicateswhetherfollow-uprepliesareorhavebeenconsideredassatisfactoryor +'( unsatisfactory,intermsoftheircompliancewiththeCommitteesViews,orwhetherthedialoguebetween , () theStatepartyandtheSpecialRapporteurforfollow-uptoViewscontinues.TheNotesfollowinga -)* _number_Ԁofcaseentriesconveyanideaofthedifficultiesincategorizingfollow-upreplies.  219.  Follow-upinformationprovidedbyStatespartiesandbypetitionersortheirrepresentatives  subsequenttothelastannualreport(A/61/40,vol.I,chap.VI)issetoutinannexVIItovolumeIIofthe  presentannualreport.      XRO'3Letter LandscapeX3'Letter'3Letter LandscapeX3'3'LetterL  461.TheCommittee'spreviousrepo=X  FOLLOW-UPRECEIVEDTODATEFORALLCASESOFVIOLATIONSOFTHECOVENANT   ǖ*dddd dd  dd dd dd edd edd D..,/\R,\R,\R,\R,\R,f\R,\\+  8DDD'  8Statepartyand  numberofcases  withviolation =DDD,!DDD =Communication  number,  authorandlocation =DDD,!DDD =Follow-upresponse   receivedfromState   partyandlocation =DDD,! DDD =Satisfactory   response =DDD,! DDD =Unsatisfactory  response =DDD,!DDD =Nofollow-up  response  received ?DDDD,!DDD ?Follow-up  dialogue  ongoing SDDB,  DDDD S... @DD/! DD @ @DD/! DD @ @DD/! DD @ @DD/! DD @ @DD/! DD @ BDDD/! DD B ND?'  DDD NPanama(2) 4DD# D 4289/1988,Wolf   A/47/40 4DD# DD 4X    A/53/40 4DD# !DD 4 4DD# "DD 4 4DD# #DD 4 6DDD# $DD 6X GDD6 % DDD G 4DD# &DD 4473/1991,Barroso  ' A/50/40 4DD# (DD 4X  ) A/53/40 4DD# *DD 4 4DD# +DD 4 4DD# ,DD 4 6DDD# -DD 6X 9DD( . DDD 9... +DD /DD + +DD 0DD + +DD 1DD + +DD 2DD + +DD 3DD + -DDD 4DD -.$" 5  DDD .