WPC JIX`Cxw羇xna2ȴQL fStL=E%!E(,_3d@+:vP$ TVK*"wӬdfǖ:ěCygkH]4rXPb8K}v[E甪3l w3,'?; P7 iA.r75"BgEi4X!8]eE%.|huGYJ-㉱4'?OȆ! OќVwf(}i:%)`F=L=`"i_k.ߊYYJf cmKY׃DԎ_ Bm_D h) 6;} ?U9'l|;HmHYp$sfRj'lU8ddgFӽ4N.|==N%8#UN %' 0F- 0Us 0 0 0d 0 0 0} 0$ 0 0` 0 0 0 0> 0 0z 0 0 0% 0 0 0S 0 0 0- 0 0K 0N 0<^ YNewg4k m B B 0fafafa\\YORK_UNIVERSITY\q_hrts_hp4000tn0(  Z6Times New Roman RegularX(c$  CEUS.,*+ (_2623  ..*D+D (_25   ," <DL,23  ..," <DL,   *5+5 (_24  ) <DL)23  ..) <DL)  *2+2 (_23 ` &<<DL&23  ..&<<DL& ` */+/ (_22  #DL#23  ..#DL#  *,+, (_21   DL 23  .. DL  *)+) (_20 h DDL23  ..DDL h *&+& (_19  L23  ..L  *#+# (_18   L23  .. L  *>> (_17  2( 4 <DL223  Ԁ2( 4 <DL2  *DD (_16   ," <DL,23  Ԁ," <DL,   *55 (_15  ) <DL)23  Ԁ) <DL)  *22 (_14 ` &<<DL&23  Ԁ&<<DL& ` *// (_13  #DL#23  Ԁ#DL#  *,, (_12   DL 23  Ԁ DL  *)) (_11 h DDL23  ԀDDL h *&& (_10  L23  ԀL  (## &_9   L23  Ԁ L  (>> &_8  2( 4 <DL223  2( 4 <DL2  (DD &_7   ," <DL,23  ," <DL,   (55 &_6  ) <DL)23  ) <DL)  (22 &_5 ` &<<DL&23  &<<DL& ` (// &_4  #DL#23  #DL#  (,, &_3   DL 23   DL  ()) &_2 h DDL23  DDL h (&& &_1  L23  L  &## $_   L23   L  6 4heading 1     2( 4 <DL2  UK XXX       US   2( 4 <DL2  <:Default Paras-6 _5:i+003|xU  d[ [d0SS.header    ! UK XXX US    !  Table_A>TABLE ATABLE A c!  CEUS.,  _   7XX PHILIPPINES #XX 7U#  I Follow-up-StateReporting  ЀActionbyTreatyBodies,IncludingReportsonMissions    CCPRA/59/40vol.I(2004)  t  CHAPTERVII.FOLLOWUPTOCONCLUDINGOBSERVATIONS L  ... $ t  260.ForallreportsofStatespartiesexaminedbytheCommitteeunderarticle40oftheCovenant `  overthelastyear,theCommitteehasidentified,accordingtoitsdevelopingpractice,alimited L  numberofpriorityconcerns,withrespecttowhichitseekstheStatepartysresponse,withinaperiod 8  ofayear,onthemeasurestakentogiveeffecttoitsrecommendations.TheCommitteewelcomes $  theextentanddepthofcooperationunderthisprocedurebyStatesparties,asmaybeobservedfrom   thefollowingcomprehensivetable.Ofthe27Statesparties(detailedbelow)thathavebeenbefore   theCommitteeunderthefollowupprocedureoverthelastyear,onlyone(RepublicofMoldova)  hasfailedtoprovideinformationatthelatestafterdispatchofareminder.TheCommitteereiterates  thatitviewsthisprocedureasaconstructivemechanismbywhichthedialogueinitiatedwiththe p examinationofareportcanbecontinued,andwhichservestosimplifytheprocessofthenext \ periodicreportonthepartoftheStateparty. H 261.ThetablebelowdetailstheexperienceoftheCommitteeoverthelastyear.Accordingly,it  p containsnoreferencetothoseStatespartieswithrespecttowhichtheCommittee,uponassessment  \ ofthefollowupresponsesprovidedtoit,decidedtotakenofurtheractionpriortotheperiod H coveredbythisreport. 4 *,- ddd Xdd Xdd X(#(#,RR,RR,RR, RR+  1'   1Stateparty    Dateinformation   due   Datereplyreceived    Furtheraction :0    :... \ ! UKCE.,Seventyninthsession(October2003)CE.,UK.,  H!" ... 0&4"#   0Philippines 8. #8$  @38297 @87November2004 7-+#8%  @38297  @ 7Є  #8& Є$#8'   $_  t'")  _CCPR_,A/60/40vol.I(2005)   CHAPTERVII.FOLLOWUPTOCONCLUDINGOBSERVATIONS t   ... L    233.ForallreportsofStatespartiesexaminedbytheCommitteeunderarticle40oftheCovenant $ t overthelastyear,theCommitteehasidentified,accordingtoitsdevelopingpractice,alimited  ` numberofpriorityconcerns,withrespecttowhichitseekstheStatepartysresponse,withinaperiod  L  ofayear,onthemeasurestakentogiveeffecttoitsrecommendations.TheCommitteewelcomes  8  theextentanddepthofcooperationunderthisprocedurebyStatesparties,asmaybeobservedfrom $  thecomprehensivetablepresentedbelow.Since18June2004,15Statesparties(Egypt,Germany,   Kenya,Latvia,Lithuania,Morocco,theNetherlands,thePhilippines,Portugal,theRussian   Federation,SerbiaandMontenegro,Slovakia,Sweden,TogoandVenezuela)havesubmitted   informationtotheCommitteeunderthefollowupprocedure.Sincethefollowupprocedurewas   institutedinMarch2001,onlysixStatesparties(Colombia,Israel,Mali,RepublicofMoldova,Sri p LankaandSuriname)havefailedtosupplyfollowupinformationthathadfallendue.The \ Committeereiteratesthatitviewsthisprocedureasaconstructivemechanismbywhichthedialogue H initiatedwiththeexaminationofareportcanbecontinued,andwhichservestosimplifytheprocess 4 ofthenextperiodicreportonthepartoftheStateparty.  p 224.ThetablebelowdetailstheexperienceoftheCommitteeoverthelastyear.Accordingly,it H containsnoreferencetothoseStatespartieswithrespecttowhichtheCommittee,uponassessment 4 ofthefollowupresponsesprovidedtoit,decidedtotakenofurtheractionpriortotheperiod   coveredbythisreport.   *6)7ddRRRRRR RR ,-(#(#,dd ,dd ,dd , dd +   StateParty '4 'DateInformation 4 Due '  'DateReply 4  Received ' ! 'FurtherAction +!4" +... P!# USCE.,Seventyninthsession(October2003)CE.,US.,] * <"$ *Philippines J@# %   @38297 @ J7November2004 lb:# &  @38297  @  `@38539`@ l7July2005 I?:# ' `@38539 `@  IUSCE.,Decisiononfurtheraction # ( willberequiredatthe $) eightyfifthsession.CE.,US.,(% *   (_  (#, USCE., _CCPR_,A/61/40vol.I(2006)   L  M  L  M  CHAPTERVII. t FOLLOW-UPTOCONCLUDINGOBSERVATIONS  L  L  M  L  M  234.InchapterVIIofitsannualreportfor2003(A/58/40,vol.I),theCommitteedescribedthe $ t frameworkthatithassetoutforprovidingformoreeffectivefollow-up,subsequenttotheadoption  ` oftheconcludingobservationsinrespectofStatespartiesreportssubmittedunderarticle40ofthe  L  Covenant.InchapterVIIofitslastannualreport(A/60/40,vol.I),anupdatedaccountofthe  8  Committeesexperienceinthisregardoverthelastyearwasprovided.Thecurrentchapteragain $  updatestheCommitteesexperienceto1August2006.   235.Overtheperiodcoveredbythepresentannualreport,Mr.Rafael_Rivas_Ԁ_Posada_Ԁcontinuedto   actastheCommitteesSpecialRapporteurforfollow-uptoconcludingobservations.Atthe   Committeeseighty-fifth,eighty-sixthandeighty-seventhsessions,hepresentedprogressreportsto p theCommitteeon_intersessional_Ԁdevelopmentsandmaderecommendationswhichpromptedthe \ CommitteetotakeappropriatedecisionsonaState-by-Statebasis. H 236.ForallreportsofStatespartiesexaminedbytheCommitteeunderarticle40oftheCovenant  p overthelastyear,theCommitteehasidentified,accordingtoitsdevelopingpractice,alimited  \ numberofpriorityconcerns,withrespecttowhichitseekstheStatepartysresponse,withinaperiod H ofayear,onthemeasurestakentogiveeffecttoitsrecommendations.TheCommitteewelcomes 4 theextentanddepthofcooperationunderthisprocedurebyStatesparties,asmaybeobservedfrom   thefollowingcomprehensivetable.Overthereportingperiod,since1August2005,14Statesparties   (Albania,Belgium,Benin,Colombia,ElSalvador,Kenya,Mauritius,Philippines,Poland,Serbiaand  Montenegro,SriLanka,Tajikistan,TogoandUganda)havesubmittedinformationtotheCommittee  underthefollow-upprocedure.Sincethefollow-upprocedurewasinstitutedinMarch2001,only  11Statesparties(EquatorialGuinea,Greece,Iceland,Israel,Mali,Moldova,Namibia,Suriname, l theGambia,UzbekistanandVenezuela)havefailedtosupplyfollow-upinformationthathasfallen X  due.TheCommitteereiteratesthatitviewsthisprocedureasaconstructivemechanismbywhich D! thedialogueinitiatedwiththeexaminationofareportcanbecontinued,andwhichservestosimplify 0"  theprocessofthenextperiodicreportonthepartoftheStateparty. #l! L  M  237.ThetablebelowdetailstheexperienceoftheCommitteeoverthelastyear.Accordingly,it $D # containsnoreferencetothoseStatespartieswithrespecttowhichtheCommittee,uponassessment %0!$ ofthefollow-upresponsesprovidedtoit,decidedtotakenofurtheractionpriortotheperiod &"% coveredbythisreport. '#&  @-(, Ї*./dddd dd dd  dd 6)7(#(#,Sdd ,rdd ,dd , dd +  $ $Stateparty 'P 'Date P informationdue '< 'Datereply P received '< 'Furtheraction "P "L  M  ... l L  M  L  M  Seventy-ninthsession(October2003)  X   L  M  L  M  L  M  L  M  Philippines 8.  (   @38297 @87November2004 ZP+ (   @38297  @ `@38539`@Z7July2005 7-+ (  `@38539 `@ 7L  M  L  M  Atitseighty-fifthsession,  (  theCommitteedecidedto   takenofurtheraction.    ...  0    0    0   0   CE.,US.,