WPC peuqJ4kVNxy(EV J r8>_ |иVQi\1 =1kyY]Tx')5ڵDܰR"(^WwI|!FiԖ˴nW/RUlsy0`ݻe3};?-Lj޲Vch80Ԭm)*>wz%6uﻻ'Є4 Ys,ig FQy.`'<-9 ֔ZՔߗXq\,aNԧ4V+Q4xDYz,"ñ^e9lԩ(U >4†j! V+&GDS\*Vؚ(2-Sy$bKisϧ;|Xwl{UH2ZӜ6-=HiU>.{!=p1`۩l{D{Z JG#UN % 0r^ q w} 4   m N 0J 0 U> U ) -I UBv DE U> 0U; 0 0m 0, 0 0 0E 0 0 0( 0 0 0_ 0 0 0B 0 0f 0 0 0q 0 0 0] 0 0 0 0<faffaafa B-+fXaZZZZZZZZZZ Bnn D+ 0(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularX(J$  XXXXXXXXԳp8 p8 H³3|xU42ParaNo. 8.9 AIQ!$8S\  `&Times New RomanS8.9 AIQ!$8S\  `&Times New RomanS<SS:Footnote TexS\  `&Times New RomanSS\  `&Times New RomanS\  `&Times New Roman  ##Xd#\  `*Times New RomanTT88889Hairline!dxdx\  `&Times New Roman*+ (_2623  ..*D+D (_25   ," <DL,23  ..," <DL,   *5+5 (_24  ) <DL)23  ..) <DL)  *2+2 (_23 ` &<<DL&23  ..&<<DL& ` */+/ (_22  #DL#23  ..#DL#  *,+, (_21   DL 23  .. DL  *)+) (_20 h DDL23  ..DDL h *&+& (_19  L23  ..L  *#+# (_18   L23  .. L  *>> (_17  2( 4 <DL223  Ԁ2( 4 <DL2  *DD (_16   ," <DL,23  Ԁ," <DL,   *55 (_15  ) <DL)23  Ԁ) <DL)  *22 (_14 ` &<<DL&23  Ԁ&<<DL& ` *// (_13  #DL#23  Ԁ#DL#  *,, (_12   DL 23  Ԁ DL  *)) (_11 h DDL23  ԀDDL h *&& (_10  L23  ԀL  (## &_9   L23  Ԁ L  (>> &_8  2( 4 <DL223  2( 4 <DL2  (DD &_7   ," <DL,23  ," <DL,   (55 &_6  ) <DL)23  ) <DL)  (22 &_5 ` &<<DL&23  &<<DL& ` (// &_4  #DL#23  #DL#  (,, &_3   DL 23   DL  ()) &_2 h DDL23  DDL h (&& &_1  L23  L  &## $_   L23   L  <:Default ParaTable_AhTable_ATABLE ATABLE A)Hairline d<TABLE B d'dxd !  X{XXXX{XXX{  _XX{  URUGUAY#X{Xu#  UKUS.,Follow-upJurisprudence    ActionbyTreatyBodiesUS.,UK.,  CCPRA/51/40,vol.I(1996)    VIII.FOLLOW-UPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL   ...    429.Acountry-by-countrybreakdownoffollow-uprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstandingasat   26July1996providesthefollowingpicture:   ...   Uruguay:Forty-fiveviewsfindingviolations;43follow-uprepliesreceived.Duringconsultationson5July v 1996,aStatepartyrepresentativepromisedasatisfactorysolutionofthetwooutstandingcasesforwhich p nofollow-upreplieshadbeenreceived(seepara.454). j ... ^ OverviewoftheSpecialRapporteursfollowupconsultations R ... F 454.Finally,on5July1996,theSpecialRapporteurmetwitharepresentativeoftheGovernmentof : Uruguay,todiscuss,interalia,issuesoffollow-uponviewsadoptedbytheCommitteeinrespectof 4 Uruguay.Ontwoviewsonwhichnofollow-upreplieshadsofarbeenreceivedfromtheGovernment,the . ~ SpecialRapporteursuggestedthattheStatepartymightconsiderawardingexgratiacompensationtothe (!x victims.TheStatepartyrepresentativerepliedthathewouldendeavourtoseekanequitablesolutionfor ""r thevictimsinthosecases. #l ... %` ! Concernoverinstancesofnon-cooperationunderthefollow-upmandate 'T"# 463.Inspiteoftheprogressincollectingfollow-upinformationsincetheadoptionofthelastannualreport, (H$% theCommitteeandtheSpecialRapporteurnotewithconcernthatanumberofcountriesdidnotprovide )B%& anyfollow-upinformationwithinthedeadlinesestablishedbytheCommitteeorhavenotrepliedto *<&' remindersorrequestsforinformationfromtheSpecialRapporteur.TheStatesthathavenotrepliedto +6'( requestsforfollow-upinformationarethefollowing: ,0()  -*)* ...  Uruguay(noreplyinrespectoftwocases);  ...  464.TheSpecialRapporteururgestheseStatespartiestoreplytohisrequestsforfollow-upinformation   withintheimparteddeadlines.        CCPRA/52/40,vol.I(1997)   VIII.FOLLOW-UPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL  ...  524.Acountry-by-countrybreakdownoffollow-uprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstandingasof   30June1997providesthefollowingpicture(Viewsinwhichthedeadlineforreceiptoffollow-up   informationhadnotyetexpiredhavenotbeenincluded):   ... t  Uruguay:45Viewsfindingviolations:43follow-upreplies,dated17October1991,receivedbut h  unpublished.Follow-uprepliesontwoViewsremainoutstanding:159/1983-Cariboni(Selected b  decisions,vol.2);13/322/1988-Rodriquez(1994Report);9/seealso1996Report,10/para.454. \  ... P Concernoverinstancesofnoncooperationunderthefollowmandate D ... 8 554.Inspiteofsomeprogressincollectingfollow-upinformationsincetheadoptionofits1996Report, ,| theCommitteeandtheSpecialRapporteurnotewithconcernthatanumberofcountriesdidnotprovide &v anyfollow-upinformationwithinthedeadlinesestablishedbytheCommitteeorhavenotrepliedto  p remindersorrequestsforinformationfromtheSpecialRapporteur.ThoseStateswhichhavenotreplied j torequestsforfollow-upinformationarethefollowing(inalphabeticalorder): d ...  X Uruguay:twocases; !L ... #@  555.TheCommitteeurgesthoseStatespartiestoreplytotheSpecialRapporteur'srequestsforfollow-up %4!" informationwithinthedeadlinesthathavebeenset. &."# _________ ("$%   13/[InternationalCovenantonCivilandPoliticalRights.HumanRightsCommittee.Selected )%& decisionsundertheOptionalProtocol],(CCPR/C/OP/2)(UnitedNationspublication,SalesNo. *&' 89.XIV.1),vol.2. +'(   9/OfficialRecordsoftheGeneralAssembly,fortyninthSession,SupplementNo.40(A/49/40). , ()   10/Ibid.,FiftyfirstSession,SupplementNo.40(A/51/40).  -)*  CCPRA/53/40,vol.I(1998)   VIII.FOLLOW-UPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL  ...  486.TheCommittee'spreviousreport(A/52/40)containedadetailedcountry-by-countrybreakdownof   follow-uprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstandingasof30June1997.Thelistthatfollowsshows   theadditionalcasesinrespectofwhichfollow-upinformationhasbeenrequestedfromStates(Viewsin   whichthedeadlineforreceiptoffollow-upinformationhadnotyetexpiredhavenotbeenincluded).Italso z   indicatesthosecasesinwhichrepliesareoutstanding.Inmanyofthesecasestherehasbeennochange t  sincethepreviousreport.ThisisbecausetheresourcesavailablefortheCommittee'sworkwere n  considerablyreducedinthecurrentyear,preventingitfromundertakingacomprehensivesystematic h  follow-upprogramme. b  ... V Uruguay:45Viewsfindingviolations:43follow-uprepliesreceived,dated17October1991,unpublished. J Follow-uprepliesontwoViewsremainoutstanding:159/1983-Cariboni(Selecteddecisions,vol.2);1/ D 322/1988-Rodriquez(1994Report(A/49/40));seealso1996Report(A/51/40),para.454. > ... 2 Concernoverthefollowupmandate &v ... j 510.TheCommitteeagainexpressesitsregretthatitsrecommendations,formulatedinits1995,1996and ^ 1997Reports,totheeffectthatatleastonefollowupmissionperyearbebudgetedbytheOfficeofthe  X UnitedNationsHighCommissionerforHumanRights,havestillnotbeenimplemented.Similarly,the !R Committeeconsidersthatstaffresourcestoservicethefollowupmandateremaininadequate,despitethe !L Committeesrepeatedrequests,andthatthispreventstheproperandtimelyconductoffollowupactivities, "F includingfollowupmissions.Inthiscontext,theCommitteeexpressesseriousconcernthat,becauseof #@  thelackofstaff,nofollowupconsultationscouldbeorganizedduringitssixtysecondsessionoratits $: ! sixtythirdsession.ItisforthisreasonthattheCommitteeisunabletoincludeinthepresentreporta %4!" completelistofStateswhichhavefailedtocooperateunderthefollowupprocedure.Stateslistedinthe &."# previousyearsreportforwhichrepliesarestilloutstandingare:...Uruguay... '(#$ _________ *&'   1/ThemandateisspelledoutintheCommittees1990ReporttotheGeneralAssembly.See +'( OfficialRecordsoftheGeneralAssembly,Fortyfifthsession,SupplementNo.40(A/45/40),annexXI. , ()   -)* CCPRA/54/40,vol.I(1999)   VII.FOLLOW-UPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL  ...  461.TheCommittee'spreviousreport(A/53/40)containedadetailedcountry-by-countrybreakdownof   follow-uprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstandingasof30June1998.Thelistthatfollowsshows   theadditionalcasesinrespectofwhichfollow-upinformationhasbeenrequestedfromStates(Viewsin   whichthedeadlineforreceiptoffollow-upinformationhadnotyetexpiredhavenotbeenincluded).Italso z   indicatesthosecasesinwhichrepliesareoutstanding.Inmanyofthesecasestherehasbeennochange t  sincethelastreport.ThisisbecausetheresourcesavailablefortheCommittee'sworkhavebeen n  considerablyreducedpreventingitfromundertakingacomprehensivesystematicfollow-upprogramme. h  ... \  Uruguay:Forty-fiveViewsfindingviolations:43follow-uprepliesreceived,dated17October1991, P unpublished.Follow-uprepliesontwoViewsremainoutstanding:159/1983-Cariboni(inSelected J Decisions,vol.2)and322/1988-Rodrquez(A/49/40);seealsoA/51/40,para.454. D    `   X  CCPRA/55/40,vol.I(2000)   UKUS., X{XXX{  X{XXX{ '  VI.FOLLOWUPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL ''݌  ЌX{XXX{  #X{XXX{'#X{XXX{...  #X{XXX{(#X{XXX{596.TheCommitteespreviousreport(A/54/40)containedadetailedcountrybycountrybreakdownof   followuprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstandingasof30June1999.Thelistthatfollowsshows   theadditionalcasesinrespectofwhichfollowupinformationhasbeenrequestedfromStates.(Viewsin   whichthedeadlineforreceiptoffollowupinformationhadnotyetexpiredhavenotbeenincluded.)Italso z   indicatesthosecasesinwhichrepliesareoutstanding.Inmanyofthesecasestherehasbeennochange t  sincethelastreport.ThisisbecausethelimitedresourcesavailablefortheCommitteesworkpreventit n  fromundertakingacomprehensiveorsystematicfollowupprogramme. h  ...US.,UK.,^'UKUS., \  Uruguay:FortyfiveViewsfindingviolations:43followuprepliesreceived,dated17October1991, P unpublished.FollowuprepliesontwoViewsremainoutstanding:159/1983Cariboni(inSelected J Decisions,vol.2)and322/1988Rodrquez(A/49/40);seealsoA/51/40,para.454. D #X{XXX{ )#US.,UK.,,  >  8{XXdd8   CCPRA/56/40,vol.I(2001)   X{XXX{UKUS.,ChapterIV.FollowupActivitiesundertheOptionalProtocolUS.,UK.,A/UKUS.,#X{XXX{"/#X{XXX{    ...  180.  TheCommitteespreviousannualreport(A/55/40,vol.I,chap.VI)containedadetailedcountry   bycountrysurveyonfollowuprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstandingasof30June2000.The   listthatfollowsupdatesthatsurvey,indicatingthosecasesinwhichrepliesareoutstanding,butdoesnot   takeintoaccounttheCommitteesViewsadoptedduringtheseventysecondsession,forwhichfollowup z   repliesarenotyetdue.Inmanycasestherehasbeennochangesincethepreviousreport. t  ...#X{XXX{/#X{XXX{US.,UK.,/UKUS., h  Uruguay:FortyfiveViewsfindingviolations:43followuprepliesreceived,dated17October1991, \  unpublished.Followupreply,dated31May2000,concerningcaseNo.110/1981VianaAcosta, V grantingpaymentofUS$120,000toMr.Viana.FollowuprepliesontwoViewsremainoutstanding: P 159/1983Cariboni(inSelectedDecisions,vol.2)and322/1988Rodrguez(A/49/40);seealso J A/51/40,paragraph454.#X{XXX{2#US.,UK., 3  D  X{XXX{UKUS.,CCPRA/57/40,vol.I(2002)   ChapterVI.Followupactivitiesundertheoptionalprotocol  ...  228.ThepreviousannualreportoftheCommittee(A/56/40,vol.I,chap.VI)containedadetailed   countrybycountrysurveyoffollowuprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstandingasof30June2001.   Thelistthatfollowsupdatesthatsurvey,indicatingthosecasesinwhichrepliesareoutstanding,butdoes   notincluderesponsesconcerningtheCommitteesViewsadoptedduringtheseventyfourthandseventy z   fifthsessions,forwhichfollowuprepliesarenotyetdue.Inmanycasestherehasbeennochangesince t  thepreviousreport. n  ... b  Uruguay:Viewsin45caseswithfindingsofviolations: V 43followuprepliesreceived,dated17October1991,unpublished.Followupreply,dated J 31May2000,concerningcaseNo.110/1981VianaAcosta,grantingpaymentofUS$120,000toMr. D Viana.Follow-uprepliesontwoViewsremainoutstanding:159/1983Cariboni(inSelectedDecisions, > vol.2)and322/1988Rodrguez(A/49/40);seealsoA/51/40,paragraph454. 8 ... ,| 229.ForfurtherinformationonthestatusofalltheViewsinwhichfollowupinformationremains  p outstandingorinrespectofwhichfollowupconsultationshavebeenorwillbescheduled,referenceis j madetothefollowupprogressreportpreparedfortheseventy-fourthsessionoftheCommittee d (CCPR/C/74/R.7/Rev.1,dated28March2002),discussedinpublicsessionattheCommittees2009th ^ meetingon4April2002(CCPR/C/SR.2009).ReferenceisalsomadetotheCommitteesprevious  X reports,inparticularA/56/40,paragraphs182to200. !R #X{XXX{5#US.,UK.,5  !L  X{XXX{CEUS.,CCPRA/58/40,vol.I(2003)   CHAPTERVI.FollowupactivitiesundertheOptionalProtocol  ...  223.ThepreviousannualreportoftheCommittee1containedadetailedcountrybycountrysurveyof   followuprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstandingasof30June2002.Thelistthatfollowsupdates   thatsurvey,indicatingthosecasesinwhichrepliesareoutstanding,butdoesnotincluderesponses   concerningtheCommitteesViewsadoptedduringtheseventyseventhandseventyeighthsessions,for z   whichfollowuprepliesarenotyetdueinthemajorityofcases.Inmanycasestherehasbeennochange t  sincethepreviousreport.* n  ... b  Uruguay: ` 0 Viewsin45caseswithfindingsofviolations:V (# (# 0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#43followuprepliesreceived,dated17October1991,unpublished.Follow-up J reply,dated31May2000,concerningcaseNo.110/1981(VianaAcosta), D grantingpaymentofUS$120,000toMr.Viana.Follow-uprepliesontwoViews > remainoutstanding:159/1983Cariboni(inSelectedDecisions,vol.2)and 8 322/1988Rodrguez(A/49/40);seealsoA/51/40,paragraph454.2 (# (# Notes  p 1.[OfficialRecordsoftheGeneralAssembly],FiftyseventhSession,SupplementNo.40(A/57/40), d vol.I,chap.VI. ^ *ThedocumentsymbolA/[SessionNo.]/40referstotheOfficialRecordoftheGeneralAssembly !R inwhichthecaseappears;annexVIreferstothepresentreport,vol.II. !L #X{XXX{S>#US.,CE.,r>  #@  X{XXX{CEUS., CCPRA/59/40vol.I(2004)   CHAPTERVI.FOLLOWUPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL  ...  230.ThepreviousannualreportoftheCommittee1containedadetailedcountry-by-countrysurveyof   followuprepliesreceivedorrequestedandoutstandingasof30June2003.Thelistthatfollowsupdates   thatsurvey,indicatingthosecasesinwhichrepliesareoutstanding,butdoesnotincluderesponses   concerningtheCommitteesViewsadoptedduringtheeightiethandeightyfirstsessions,forwhichfollow z   uprepliesarenotyetdueinthemajorityofcases.Inmanycasestherehasbeennochangesincethe t  previousreport.* n  ... b  US.,CE.,F*34 ddd Xdd Xdd X(#(#,UU,UU+  1'VV 1UKUS.,Uruguay:US.,UK.,!K 'V 'Viewsin45caseswithfindingsofviolations: 6,V  6 'F '43followuprepliesreceived,dated17October1991,unpublished. F Follow-upreply,dated31May2000,concerningcaseNo.110/1981(Viana @ Acosta),grantingpaymentofUS$120,000toMr.Viana.Follow-upreplies : ontwoViewsremainoutstanding:159/1983Cariboni(inSelected 4 Decisions,vol.2)and322/1988Rodrguez(A/49/40);seealsoA/51/40, . paragraph454.$(   $CEUS.,_______________ r Notes l 1/Ibid.,FiftyeighthSession,SupplementNo.40(A/58/40),vol.I,chap.VI. ` *ThedocumentsymbolA/[sessionNo.]/40referstotheOfficialRecordsoftheGeneralAssemblyin T! whichthecaseappears;annexIXreferstothepresentreport,volumeII. N" #X{XXX{}F#US.,CE.,N  <% " X{XXX{CEUS., CCPR,A/60/40vol.I(2005)   ...  CHAPTERVI.FOLLOWUPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL   224.InJuly1990,theCommitteeestablishedaprocedureforthemonitoringoffollowuptoitsViews   underarticle5,paragraph4,oftheOptionalProtocol,andcreatedthemandateoftheSpecialRapporteur   forthefollowuponViewstothiseffect.Mr.AndohasbeentheSpecialRapporteursinceMarch2001 z   (seventyfirstsession). t  225.In1991,theSpecialRapporteurbegantorequestfollowupinformationfromStatesparties.Such h  informationhasbeensystematicallyrequestedinrespectofallViewswithafindingofaviolationof b  Covenantrights.Atotalof391Viewsoutofthe503Viewsadoptedsince1979concludedthattherehad \  beenaviolationoftheCovenant. V 228.Inmanycases,theSecretariathasalsoreceivedinformationfromcomplainantstotheeffectthatthe J CommitteesViewshavenotbeenimplemented.Conversely,inrareinstances,thepetitionerhasinformed D theCommitteethattheStatepartyhasinfactgiveneffecttotheCommitteesrecommendations,even > thoughtheStatepartydidnotitselfprovidethatinformation. 8 229.Thepresentannualreportadoptsadifferentformatforthepresentationoffollowupinformation ,| comparedtopreviousannualreports.Thetablebelowdisplaysacompletepictureoffollowupreplies &v fromStatespartiesreceivedasof28July2005,inrelationtoViewsinwhichtheCommitteefound  p violationsoftheCovenant.Whereverpossible,itindicateswhetherfollowuprepliesareorhavebeen j consideredassatisfactoryorunsatisfactory,intermsofcomplyingwiththeCommitteesViews,orwhether d thedialoguebetweentheStatepartyandtheSpecialRapporteurforfollowuponViewscontinues.The ^ notesfollowinganumberofcaseentriesconveyanideaofthedifficultiesincategorizingfollowupreplies.  X 230.FollowupinformationprovidedbyStatespartiesandbypetitionersortheirrepresentativessince !L thelastannualreportissetoutinanewannexVII,containedinVolumeIIofthepresentannualreport. "F This,moredetailed,followupinformationalsoindicatesactionstilloutstandinginthosecasesthatremain #@  underreview. $: !   '(#$ TRO'3#Avery 12-294/295 Laser Ta LandscapeX3' Letter'3Letter LandscapeLaser Ta Landscape3'LetterT   FOLLOWUPRECEIVEDTODATEFORALLCASESOFVIOLATIONSOFTHECOVENANT   ~\*6D7ed dUUUU34..,'bZ,4bZ, bZ,'bZ,bZ,bZ,bb+  6DD' @6;XX{#;;P#;;US.,CE.,1PUKUS.,Statepartyand  numberofcases o withviolation#;;^#;;US.,UK.,^CEUS., ;DD,!8 @DD @;#;;|_#;;US.,CE.,_UKUS.,Communicationnumber,  authorandlocationa#;;%`#;;US.,UK.,^`CEUS., ;DD,!o@DD @;  #;;`#;;US.,CE.,aUKUS.,Followupresponsereceivedfrom   Statepartyandlocation#;;a#;;US.,UK.,aCEUS., ;DD,!o @DD @;Satisfactory   response ;DD,!o @DD @;Unsatisfactory   response ;DD,!o@DD @;Nofollowup  response ?DDD,!o@DD @?Followup  dialogue o ongoing IDD:'8 @  DDD @I... ;DD,! a@DD @; ;DD,! a@DD @; ;DD,! a@DD @; ;DD,! a@DD @; ;DD,! a@DD @; ?DDD,! a@DD @? NDD?' a@  DDD @NUruguay(45) ;DD,! :@DD @; A .[5/1977,Massera  : Seventhsession   43/1979,Caldas |  Nineteenthsession E  63/1979,Antonaccio ^  Fourteenthsession ' ! 73/1980,Izquierdo  " Fifteenthsession i # 80/1980,Vasiliskis 2 $ Eighteenthsession K % 83/1981,Machado & Twentiethsession ' 84/1981,Dermis V( Seventeenthsession o) 85/1981,Romero 8* Twentyfirstsession + 88/1981,Bequio z, Eighteenthsession C- 92/1981,Nieto  \. Nineteenthsession %/ 103/1981,Scarone 0 Twentiethsession g1 105/1981,Cabreira 02 Nineteenthsession I3 109/1981,VoituretTwenty 4 firstsession 5 123/1982,Lluberas T6 Twentyfirstsession] ;DD,! m7@DD @;X  :8 43followuprepliesreceivedin  9 A/59/40* ;DD,!| :@DD @;X  :; (relatingtocasesD  < andG) ;DD,!| =@DD @;X(relatingto  :> casesA,B,C,  ? E,F) ;DD,!| @@DD @;  ?DDD,! :A@DD @?X NDD?' :B@  DDD @NKF(XK ;DD,!@DD @; B .[103/1981,Scarone  73/1980,Izquierdo   92/1981,Nieto J 85/1981,Romero] ;DD,!c@DD @; ;DD,!@DD @; ;DD,!@DD @; ;DD,!@DD @;  ?DDD,! @DD @? NDD?' @  DDD @NKF(X<K ;DD,!< @DD @; C. [63/1979,Antonaccio <  80/1980,Vasiliskis   123/1982,Lluberas] ;DD,!~ @DD @; ;DD,!<@DD @; ;DD,!<@DD @; ;DD,!<@DD @;  ?DDD,!<@DD @? NDD?'<@  DDD @NKF(XW K ;DD,!W @DD @; D. [57/1979,Martins W  Fifteenthsession  p 77/1980,Liechtenstein  9 Eighteenthsession   106/1981,Montero {  Eighteenthsession D  108/1981,Nuez  ]  Nineteenthsession] ;DD,!& @DD @; ;DD,!W @DD @; ;DD,!W @DD @; ;DD,!W @DD @;  ?DDD,!W  @DD @? NDD?'W !@  DDD @NKF(XK ;DD,!@DD @; E. [4/1977,Ramirez  Fourthsession  6/1977,Sequeiro J Sixthsession c 8/1977,Perdomo , Ninthsession  9/1977,Valcada n  Eighthsession 7   10/1977,Gonzalez  P  Fifteenthsession    11/1977,Motta    Tenthsession [   25/1978,Massiotti $t  Sixteenthsession =  28/1978,WeiszEleventh   session   K7NN^f"n$&)v+-&0~2XK32/1978,TouronTwelfth H  session a  W=NN V^f"n$&)v+-&0~2NNXW33/1978,Carballal * Twelfthsession  37/1978,DeBoston l Twelfthsession N  44/1979,Pietraroia  Twelfthsession  52/1979,LopezBurgos Y Thirteenthsession "r 56/1979,Celiberti ; Thirteenthsession ;DD,!@DD @; ;DD,!@DD @; ;DD,! @DD @; ;DD,!!@DD @;  ?DDD,!"@DD @? NDD?'#@  DDD @N ;DD,!@DD @;66/1980,Schweizer  Seventeenthsession  70/1980,Simones J Fifteenthsession c 74/1980,Estrella , Eighteenthsession  110/1981,Viana n  Twentyfirstsession 7   139/1983,Conteris  P   Twentyfifthsession    147/1983,Gilboa    Twentysixthsession [   162/1983,AcostaThirty $t  fourthsession] ;DD,!= @DD @; ;DD,!@DD @; ;DD,!@DD @; ;DD,!@DD @;  ?DDD,!@DD @? NDD?'@  DDD @N ;DD,! @DD @; F. [30/1978,Bleier   Fifteenthsession   84/1981,Barbato X  Seventeenthsession !q  107/1981,Quinteros : Nineteenthsession] ;DD,!@DD @; ;DD,! @DD @; ;DD,! @DD @; ;DD,! @DD @;  ?DDD,! @DD @? NDD?' @  DDD @N ;DD,!!@DD @; G. 34/1978,Silva " Twelfthsession ;DD,!U#@DD @; ;DD,!$@DD @; ;DD,!%@DD @; ;DD,!&@DD @;  ?DDD,!'@DD @? NDD?'(@  DDD @N CDDD0!@DD @C*Note:Followupinformationwasprovidedon17October1991,butwasunpublished.Thelistofcasesunder A :theStatepartysubmitted  thaton1March1985,thecompetenceofthecivilcourtswasreestablished.Theamnestylawof8March1985benefitedalltheindividuals  whohadbeeninvolvedasauthors,accomplicesoraccessoryparticipantsinpoliticalcrimesorcrimescommittedforpoliticalpurposes J committedfrom1January1962to1March1985.Thelawallowedthoseindividualsheldresponsibleforintentionalmurdertohaveeither c theirsentencereviewedortheirconvictionreduced.Pursuanttoarticle10oftheLawonNationalPacification,alltheindividuals , imprisonedunder measuresofsecuritywerereleased.Incasessubjectedtoreview,appellatecourtseitheracquittedorconvictedthe  individuals.Byvirtueoflaw15.783of20November,alltheindividualswhohadpreviouslyheldpublicofficewereentitledtoresumetheir n  jobs.Oncasesunder B :theStatepartystatesthattheseindividualswerepardonedbyvirtueoflaw15.737andreleasedon10March1985. 7   Oncasesunder C :theseindividualswerereleasedon14March1985;theircaseswereincludedunderlaw15.737.Oncasesunder D :from  P  thedateonwhichitenteredintoforce,theamnestylawendedtheregimesforthesurveillanceofindividuals,pendingarrestwarrants;the    restrictionsonenteringorexitingthecountry;andeveryofficialinquiryintocrimescoveredbytheamnesty.From8March1985,the    issuanceoftraveldocumentswasnolongersubjectedtoanyrestriction.SamuelLiechtenstein,afterhisreturntoHungary,resumedhis [   positionastheHeadoftheUniversityoftheRepublic.Oncasesunder E :from1March1985,thepossibilityoffilinganactionfordamages $t  wasopentoallofthevictimsofhumanrightsviolationsthathadoccurredduringthedefactoGovernment.From1985todate,36suitsfor =  damageshavebeenfiled,22ofthemrelatedtoarbitrarydetentionand12totherestitutionofproperty.TheGovernmentsettledMr.L;pezs   caseon21November1990bypayinghimUS$200,000.ThesuitfiledbyMs.Celibertiisstillpending.Besidestheabovementioned    cases,noothervictimhasfiledalawsuitagainsttheStateclaimingcompensation.Oncasesunder F :on22December1986,theCongress H  passedlaw15.848,knownas theexpirationoftheStatepowertoprosecute.ThelawextinguishedthepowerofStateauthoritiesto a  prosecutecrimescommittedbymilitaryorpoliceagentsforpoliticalpurposesorintheexecutionofordersgiventothembytheirsuperiors * before1March1985.Allpendingproceedingswerediscontinued.On16April1989,thelawwasconfirmedbyreferendum.Thelaw  orderedtheinvestigatingjudgestosendreportssubmittedtothejudiciaryaboutvictimsofdisappearancestotheexecutive,forthelatterto l initiateinquiries. QDDB*5@  DDD @Q ;DD,!^@DD @;159/1983,Cariboni ^ A/43/40and ' SelectedDecisions,vol.2 ;DD,!@DD @; ;DD,!^@DD @; ;DD,!^@DD @; ;DD,!^@DD @;X ?DDD,!^@DD @?X PDDD?'^ @  DDD @P =DDD,!y!@DDD @=322/1988,Rodrguez y" A/49/40 =DDD,!B#@DDD @= =DDD,!y$@DDD @= =DDD,!y%@DDD @= =DDD,!y&@DDD @=X y' A/51/40 ?DDDD,!B(@DDD @?X7-+y)@  DDDD 7#X{X;v^#aThelocationreferstothedocumentsymboloftheOfficialRecordsoftheGeneralAssembly,SupplementNo.40,whichistheannualreport  ]* oftheCommitteetotherespectivesessionsoftheAssembly. W+ #X{XXX{Gb#US.,CE.,b_  E. TRX3'Avery 12-294/295 Laser TaO'3#Avery 12-294/295 Laser Ta Landscape3'Letter2-294/295 Laser Ta__ |*%) '3Letter LandscapeLaser Ta LandscapeTX{XXX{CEUS., _CCPR_,A/60/40vol.II(2005)   ...  AnnexVII   FOLLOW-UPOFTHEHUMANRIGHTSCOMMITTEEONINDIVIDUALCOMMUNICATIONS   UNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOLTOTHEINTERNATIONALCOVENANTONCIVIL   ANDPOLITICALRIGHTS z   ThisreportsetsoutallinformationprovidedbyStatespartiesandauthorsortheircounselsincethelast n  AnnualReport(A/59/40). h  #X{XXX{#US.,CE.,... \    ;XX{*01d ed'bZ'4bZ4 bZ 'bZ'bZbZbb6D7(#(#,UU,pUU+  1'PP 1UKUS.,#X{X;# Stateparty  P  URUGUAY 6,P  6 Case  b _Viana_,110/1981 6,b  6 Viewsadoptedon A7 $ @@30405@@A31March1983 XN6$ @@30405  @@ X Issuesandviolations  found     Inhumantreatment,nolegalcounselofownchoosingandtrialwithundue  delay-articles7,10,paragraph1,14,paragraph3(b),_(c_),(d). ?5  ? Remedy R recommended  L   Provisionofeffectiveremediesand,inparticular,withcompensationfor R physicalandmentalinjuryandsufferingcausedtohimbytheinhuman L treatmenttowhichhewassubjected. ?5F  ? Statepartyresponse   X    On31May2000,theStatepartyhadinformedtheCommitteethatithad  X! decidedtoprovidetheauthorwithcompensationofUS$120,000. ?5!R"  ? Authorscomments  "# Byletterof4November2004,theauthorallegesthattheStatepartyhas "$ notcompliedwiththeCommitteesViews.;XX{US.,UK.,$#%   $#X{X;#  z&!& TRX3'LetterX3'Avery 12-294/295 Laser Ta3'LetterscapeX3'3'Letter2-294/295 Laser Ta__ |*%) T _CCPR_,A/61/40vol.I(2006)   ...  L  M  L  M  CHAPTERVIFOLLOW-UPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL     227.InJuly1990,theCommitteeestablishedaprocedureforthemonitoringoffollow-uptoitsViews   underarticle5,paragraph4,oftheOptionalProtocol,andcreatedthemandateoftheSpecialRapporteur   forfollow-uptoViewstothiseffect.Mr._Ando_ԀhasbeentheSpecialRapporteursinceMarch2001 z   (seventy-firstsession). t  228.In1991,theSpecialRapporteurbegantorequestfollow-upinformationfromStatesparties.Such h  informationhasbeensystematicallyrequestedinrespectofallViewswithafindingofaviolationof b  Covenantrights;429Viewsoutofthe547Viewsadoptedsince1979concludedthattherehadbeena \  violationoftheCovenant. V 229.Allattemptstocategorizefollow-uprepliesbyStatespartiesareinherentlyimpreciseandsubjective: J itaccordinglyisnotpossibletoprovideaneatstatisticalbreakdownoffollow-upreplies.Manyfollow-up D repliesreceivedmaybeconsideredsatisfactory,inthattheydisplaythewillingnessoftheStatepartyto > implementtheCommitteesrecommendationsortoofferthecomplainantanappropriateremedy.Other 8 repliescannotbeconsideredsatisfactorybecausetheyeitherdonotaddresstheCommitteesViewsatall 2 oronlyrelatetocertainaspectsofthem.Somerepliessimplynotethatthevictimhasfiledaclaimfor ,| compensationoutsidestatutorydeadlinesandthatnocompensationcanthereforebepaid.Stillother &v repliesindicatethatthereisnolegalobligationontheStatepartytoprovidearemedy,butthataremedy  p willbeaffordedtothecomplainantonanL  M  exgratiaL  M  Ԁbasis. j 230.Theremainingfollow-upreplieschallengetheCommitteesViewsandfindingsonfactualorlegal ^ grounds,constitutemuch-belatedsubmissionsonthemeritsofthecomplaint,promiseaninvestigationof  X thematterconsideredbytheCommitteeorindicatethattheStatepartywillnot,foronereasonoranother, !R giveeffecttotheCommitteesViews. !L 231.Inmanycases,theSecretariathasalsoreceivedinformationfromcomplainantstotheeffectthatthe #@  CommitteesViewshavenotbeenimplemented.Conversely,inrareinstances,thepetitionerhasinformed $: ! theCommitteethattheStatepartyhadinfactgiveneffecttotheCommitteesrecommendations,even %4!" thoughtheStatepartyhadnotitselfprovidedthatinformation. &."# 232.Thepresentannualreportadoptsthesameformatforthepresentationoffollow-upinformationas ("$% thelastannualreport.Thetablebelowdisplaysacompletepictureoffollow-uprepliesfromStatesparties )%& receivedupto7July2006,inrelationtoViewsinwhichtheCommitteefoundviolationsoftheCovenant. *&' Whereverpossible,itindicateswhetherfollow-uprepliesareorhavebeenconsideredassatisfactoryor +'( unsatisfactory,intermsoftheircompliancewiththeCommitteesViews,orwhetherthedialoguebetween , () theStatepartyandtheSpecialRapporteurforfollow-uptoViewscontinues.TheNotesfollowinga -)* numberofcaseentriesconveyanideaofthedifficultiesincategorizingfollow-upreplies.  233.  Follow-upinformationprovidedbyStatespartiesandbypetitionersortheirrepresentatives  subsequenttothelastannualreport(A/60/40,vol.I,chap.VI)issetoutinannexVIItovolumeIIofthe  presentannualreport.   TRO'3Letter LandscapeX3'Letter'3Letter LandscapeX3'3'LetterscapeX3'TL  M  L  M  FOLLOW-UPRECEIVEDTODATEFORALLCASESOFVIOLATIONSOFTHECOVENANT   *2D5ddUUpUUp01..,dd ,dd ,` dd ,dd ,dd ,edd ,dd +  $ $Stateparty R andnumber L ofcaseswith  F violation ' @ 'L  M  L  M  Communication R number,authorand L  location ' F  'L  M  L  M  Follow-upresponse R  receivedfromStateparty L  andlocation ' F  'L  M  L  M  Satisfactory R response 'L 'L  M  L  M  Unsatisfactory R response 'L 'L  M  L  M  No R follow-up L response  F received ' @ 'L  M  L  M  Follow-up R dialogue L ongoing  F ...  ~    ~    ~    ~    ~    ~    ~   Uruguay  \  (45) &V ! ;; &AL  M  .[5/1977,L  M  _Massera_ԀL  M    \ " Seventhsession V # 43/1979,L  M  CaldasL  M   P $ Nineteenthsession J % 63/1979,L  M  _Antonaccio_L  M   D & Fourteenthsession >' 73/1980,L  M  _Izquierdo_L  M   8( Fifteenthsession 2) 80/1980,L  M  _Vasiliskis_L  M   ,* Eighteenthsession &+ 83/1981,L  M  _Machado_L  M    , Twentiethsession - 84/1981,L  M  DermisL  M   . Seventeenthsession / 85/1981,L  M  RomeroL  M   0 Twentyfirstsession 1 88/1981,L  M  _Bequio_L  M   2 Eighteenthsession  3 L  M  L  M  X  \ 4 43follow-upreplies V 5 receivedinA/59/40* P 6   J 7 X  \ 8 L  M  (relatingto V 9 casesDand P : G)  J ; L  M  L  M  X(relatingto  \ < cases V = L  M  A,B,C,E,F)  P >    \ ? X   \ @    92/1981,L  M  _Nieto_L  M   d Nineteenthsession ^  103/1981,L  M  _Scarone_L  M   X Twentiethsession R 105/1981,L  M  _Cabreira_L  M   L Nineteenthsession  F 109/1981,L  M  _Voituret_L  M    @ TwentyfirstsessionL  M    : 123/1982,L  M  _Lluberas_L  M    4  Twentyfirstsession]    .    d    d    d    d   d   X  BL  M  .[103/1981,L  M  _Scarone_L  M   l  73/1980,L  M  _Izquierdo_L  M   f  92/1981,L  M  _Nieto_L  M   `  85/1981,L  M  RomeroL  M  ]  Z    l    l    l    l    l     CL  M  .[63/1979,L  M  _Antonaccio_L  M   8 80/1980,L  M  _Vasiliskis_L  M   2 123/1982,L  M  _Lluberas_L  M  ]  ,   8   8   8   8   8    V  DL  M  .[57/1979,L  M  MartinsL  M   j! Fifteenthsession d" 77/1980,L  M  LiechtensteinL  M   ^# Eighteenthsession X$ 106/1981,L  M  L  M   R% Eighteenthsession L& 108/1981,L  M  _Nuez_L  M   F' Nineteenthsession]  @(   j)   j*   j+   j,   j-    EL  M  .[4/1977,L  M  RamirezL  M   d Fourthsession ^ 6/1977,L  M  _Sequeiro_L  M   X  Sixthsession R 8/1977,L  M  _Perdomo_L  M   L Ninthsession  F 9/1977,L  M  _Valcada_L  M    @ Eighthsession  : 10/1977,L  M  GonzalezL  M    4  Fifteenthsession  .  11/1977,L  M  _Motta_L  M   (  Tenthsession "  25/1978,L  M  _Massiotti_   Sixteenthsession   28/1978,L  M  _Weisz_L  M    Eleventhsession   32/1978,L  M  _Touron_  Twelfthsession  33/1978,L  M  _Carballal_L  M    Twelfthsession  37/1978,L  M  DeBoston  Twelfthsession  44/1979,L  M  _Pietraroia_L  M    Twelfthsession  52/1979,L  M  LopezBurgosL  M    Thirteenthsession ~ 56/1979,L  M  _Celiberti_L  M   x Thirteenthsession  r   d   d   d   d    d!    66/1980,L  M  _Schweizer_L  M   d Seventeenthsession ^  70/1980,L  M  _Simones_L  M   X Fifteenthsession R 74/1980,L  M  _Estrella_L  M   L Eighteenthsession  F 110/1981,L  M  _Viana_L  M    @ Twentyfirstsession  : 139/1983,L  M  _Conteris_L  M    4  Twentyfifthsession  .  147/1983,L  M  _Gilboa_ (  TwentyL  M  sL  M  ixthsession "  162/1983,L  M  _Acosta_L  M     Thirtyfourthsession]      d   d   d   d   d   @ FL  M  .[30/1978,L  M  _Bleier_L  M   T Fifteenthsession N 84/1981,L  M  _Barbato_L  M   H Seventeenthsession B 107/1981,L  M  _Quinteros_L  M   < Nineteenthsession]  6   T   T   T   T   T   ` GL  M  .34/1978,L  M  SilvaL  M    Twelfthsession      !   "   #   $   %   8% L  M  L  M  159/1983,L  M  _Cariboni_L  M   L& A/43/40 F' SelectedDecisionsvol.2L  M  L  M  L  M   @(   L)   L*   L+ X  L, X  L-   j- 322/1988,A/51/40 . L  M  _Rodrguez_L  M    / A/49/40  !0   1   2   3 X 4 A/51/40   5 X  6 ...  d   d   d   d   d   d  d L  M  L  M  *L  M  NoteL  M  :Follow-upinformationwasprovidedon17October1991(unpublished).ThelistofcasesunderL  M  AL  M  :theStatepartysubmittedthat 8 on1March1985,thecompetenceofthecivilcourtswasre-established.Theamnestylawof8March1985_benefited_Ԁalltheindividualswho 2  hadbeeninvolvedasauthors,accomplicesoraccessoryparticipantsofpoliticalcrimesorcrimescommittedforpoliticalpurposes,from1 , |  January1962to1March1985.Thelawallowedthoseindividualsheldresponsibleofintentionalmurdertohaveeithertheirsentence & v  reviewedortheirconvictionreduced.Pursuanttoarticle10oftheLawonNationalPacificationalltheindividualsimprisonedunder  p   measuresofsecuritywerereleased.Incasessubjectedtoreview,appellatecourtseitheracquittedorcondemnedtheindividuals.Byvirtue  j  ofLaw15.783of20November1985alltheindividualswhohadpreviouslyheldapublicofficewereentitledtoresumetheirjobs.Oncases  d underL  M  BL  M  :itstatesthattheseindividualswerepardonedbyvirtueofLaw15.737andreleasedon10March1985.OncasesunderL  M  CL  M  :these ^  individualswerereleasedon14March1985;theircaseswereincludedunderlaw15.737.OncasesunderL  M  DL  M  :theamnestylawended,from X  thedateonwhichitenteredintoforce,theregimesforthesurveillanceofindividuals,pendingarrestwarrants,therestrictionstoenterorexit R  thecountry;andeveryofficialinquiryintocrimescoveredbytheamnesty.From8March1985,theissuanceoftraveldocumentswasno L  longersubjectedtoanyrestriction.SamuelLiechtenstein,afterhisreturntoHungary,resumedhispositionastheHeadoftheUniversity F  oftheRepublic.OncasesunderL  M  EL  M  :from1March1985,thepossibilitytofileanactionfordamageswasopentoallofthevictimsofhuman @ rightsviolationswhichoccurredduringthedefactogovernment.From1985uptodate,36suitsindamageshavebeenfiled,22ofthemare : relatedtoarbitrarydetentionand12totherestitutionofproperty.TheGovernmentsettledMr.Lopezscaseon21November1990,by 4 payinghimUS$200,000.ThesuitfiledbyMs.Lilian_Celiberti_Ԁisstillpending.Besidestheabove-mentionedcases,noothervictimhas . filedalaw-suitagainsttheStateclaimingcompensation.OncasesunderL  M  FL  M  :on22December1986,theCongresspassedLaw15.848,known ( as theexpirationoftheStatepowerstoprosecute.ThelawextinguishedthepowerofStateauthoritiestoprosecutecrimescommittedby " militaryorpoliceagentsforpoliticalpurposesorintheexecutionofordersgiventothembytheirsuperiorsbefore1March1985.Allpending  proceedingswerediscontinued.On16April1989,thelawwasconfirmedbyreferendum.Thelaworderedtheinvestigatingjudgestosend  reportssubmittedtothejudiciaryaboutvictimsofdisappearancestotheExecutive,forthelattertoinitiateinquiries.      TRX3'LetterO'3Letter Landscape3'Letter@@30405@@A31March1983 XN'3Letter LandscapeX3'T _CCPR_,A/62/40vol.I(2007)   ...  CHAPTERVI.FOLLOW-UPACTIVITIESUNDERTHEOPTIONALPROTOCOL   213.  InJuly1990,theCommitteeestablishedaprocedureforthemonitoringoffollow-uptoitsViews   underarticle5,paragraph4,oftheOptionalProtocol,andcreatedthemandateoftheSpecialRapporteur   forfollow-uptoViewstothiseffect.Mr._Ando_ԀhasbeentheSpecialRapporteursinceMarch2001 z   (seventy-firstsession). t  214.  In1991,theSpecialRapporteurbegantorequestfollow-upinformationfromStatesparties.Such h  informationhasbeensystematicallyrequestedinrespectofallViewswithafindingofaviolationof b  Covenantrights;452Viewsoutofthe570Viewsadoptedsince1979concludedthattherehadbeena \  violationoftheCovenant. V 215.  Allattemptstocategorizefollow-uprepliesbyStatespartiesareinherentlyimpreciseand J subjective:itaccordinglyisnotpossibletoprovideaneatstatisticalbreakdownoffollow-upreplies.Many D follow-uprepliesreceivedmaybeconsideredsatisfactory,inthattheydisplaythewillingnessoftheState > partytoimplementtheCommitteesrecommendationsortoofferthecomplainantanappropriateremedy. 8 OtherrepliescannotbeconsideredsatisfactorybecausetheyeitherdonotaddresstheCommitteesViews 2 atalloronlyrelatetocertainaspectsofthem.Somerepliessimplynotethatthevictimhasfiledaclaimfor ,| compensationoutsidestatutorydeadlinesandthatnocompensationcanthereforebepaid.Stillotherreplies &v indicatethatthereisnolegalobligationontheStatepartytoprovidearemedy,butthataremedywillbe  p affordedtothecomplainantonanexgratiabasis. j 216.  Theremainingfollow-upreplieschallengetheCommitteesViewsandfindingsonfactualorlegal ^ grounds,constitutemuch-belatedsubmissionsonthemeritsofthecomplaint,promiseaninvestigationof  X thematterconsideredbytheCommitteeorindicatethattheStatepartywillnot,foronereasonoranother, !R giveeffecttotheCommitteesViews. !L 217.  Inmanycases,theCommitteesecretariathasalsoreceivedinformationfromcomplainantstothe #@  effectthattheCommitteesViewshavenotbeenimplemented.Conversely,inrareinstances,thepetitioner $: ! hasinformedtheCommitteethattheStatepartyhadinfactgiveneffecttotheCommittees %4!" recommendations,eventhoughtheStatepartyhadnotitselfprovidedthatinformation. &."# 218.  Thepresentannualreportadoptsthesameformatforthepresentationoffollow-upinformationas ("$% thelastannualreport.Thetablebelowdisplaysacompletepictureoffollow-uprepliesfromStatesparties )%& receivedupto7July2007,inrelationtoViewsinwhichtheCommitteefoundviolationsoftheCovenant. *&' Whereverpossible,itindicateswhetherfollow-uprepliesareorhavebeenconsideredassatisfactoryor +'( unsatisfactory,intermsoftheircompliancewiththeCommitteesViews,orwhetherthedialoguebetween , () theStatepartyandtheSpecialRapporteurforfollow-uptoViewscontinues.TheNotesfollowinga -)* numberofcaseentriesconveyanideaofthedifficultiesincategorizingfollow-upreplies.  219.  Follow-upinformationprovidedbyStatespartiesandbypetitionersortheirrepresentatives  subsequenttothelastannualreport(A/61/40,vol.I,chap.VI)issetoutinannexVIItovolumeIIofthe  presentannualreport.      XRO'3Letter LandscapeX3'Letter'3Letter LandscapeX3'3'Letter@@30405@@A31March1983 XNuX  FOLLOW-UPRECEIVEDTODATEFORALLCASESOFVIOLATIONSOFTHECOVENANT   *9:dddd dd ` dd ` dd dd edd edd 2D5..,/\R,\R,\R,\R,\R,f\R,\\+  8DDD'  8Statepartyand  numberofcases  withviolation =DDD,!DDD =Communication  number,  authorandlocation =DDD,!DDD =Follow-upresponse   receivedfromState   partyandlocation =DDD,! DDD =Satisfactory   response =DDD,! DDD =Unsatisfactory  response =DDD,!DDD =Nofollow-up  response  received ?DDDD,!DDD ?Follow-up  dialogue  ongoing SDDB,  DDDD S... @DD/! DD @ @DD/! DD @ @DD/! DD @ @DD/! DD @ @DD/! DD @ BDDD/! DD B ND?'  DDD NUruguay(52) 2D# D 2 A .[5/1977,_Massera_Ԁ   Seventhsession   43/1979,Caldas    Nineteenthsession  ! 63/1979,_Antonaccio_  " Fourteenthsession  # 73/1980,_Izquierdo_  $ Fifteenthsession  % 80/1980,_Vasiliskis_  & Eighteenthsession ~' 83/1981,_Machado_ x( Twentiethsession r) 84/1981,Dermis l* Seventeenthsession f+ 85/1981,Romero `, Twentyfirstsession Z- 88/1981,_Bequio_ T. Eighteenthsession N/ 92/1981,_Nieto_ H0 Nineteenthsession B1 103/1981,_Scarone_ <2 Twentiethsession 63 105/1981,_Cabreira_ 0 4 Nineteenthsession *!z5 109/1981,_Voituret_ $"t6 Twentyfirstsession  123/1982,_Lluberas_  Twenty-firstsession]    2D# D 2X   43follow-upreplies   receivedinA/59/40*       2D#D 2X   (relatingto   casesDand   G)    2D#D 2X(relatingto   cases   A,B,C,E,F)    2D#D 2    6DD#D 6X    JD;#  DD J +DDD D + B .[103/1981,_Scarone_   73/1980,_Izquierdo_   92/1981,_Nieto_   85/1981,Romero]   +DDDDDD + +DDD DDD + +DDD  DDD + +DDD  DDD + -DDDD  DDD - ?D0   DDDD ? 4DD#| D 4 C .[63/1979,_Antonaccio_ | 80/1980,_Vasiliskis_ v  123/1982,_Lluberas_] p   4DD#j DD 4 4DD#|DD 4 4DD#|DD 4 4DD#|DD 4 6DDD#|DD 6 ED6| DDD E 2D#n D 2 D .[57/1979,Martins n  Fifteenthsession h  77/1980,_Lichtensztejn_ b Eighteenthsession \ 106/1981,Montero V Eighteenthsession P 108/1981, J _NuezNineteenth_Ԁsession] 2D#DD 2 2D#n D 2 2D#n !D 2 2D#n "D 2 6DD#n #D 6 ?D0n $ DD ? ,DD , E .[4/1977,Ramirez  Fourthsession  6/1977,_Sequeiro_   Sixthsession   8/1977,_Perdomo_   Ninthsession   9/1977,_ValcadaEighth_    session   10/1977,   _GonzalezFifteenth_Ԁsession |  11/1977,_MottaTenth_ v  session ,Dp D , ,DD , ,DD , ,DD , 0DDD 0 ED6 DD E 2D#t D 266/1980,_Schweizer_ t  Seventeenthsession n  70/1980,_Simones_ h  Fifteenthsession b 74/1980,_Estrella_ \ Eighteenthsession V 110/1981,_VianaTwenty_Ԅ P firstsession J 139/1983, D _ConterisTwenty_Ԅfifth > session 8 147/1983,_Gilboa_ 2 Twentysixthsession 2D#,z D 2 2D#t !D 2 2D#t "D 2 2D#t #D 2 6DD#t $D 6 ED6t % DD E 2D#& t&D 2 2D#& t'D 2 2D#& t(D 2 2D#& t)D 2 2D#& t*D 2 6DD#& t+D 6 ED6& t, DD E 2D#D 2 F .[30/1978,_Bleier_  Fifteenthsession   84/1981,_Barbato_   Seventeenthsession   107/1981,_Quinteros_   Nineteenthsession] 2D# D 2 2D#D 2 2D# D 2 2D# D 2 6DD# D 6 ED6  DD E 2D#  D 2 2D# D 2 2D# D 2 2D# D 2 2D# D 2 6DD# D 6 ED6  DD E )DDD ) G .[34/1978,Silva  Twelfthsession] )DDDD ) )DDDD ) )DDDD ) )DDDD ) -DDDDD - ED6 DDD E +DD|D + +DD|DD + +DD|DD + +DD| DD + +DD|!DD + -DDD|"DD - DD5#|#  DDD  D 4DDD! $ D 4*Note:Follow-upinformationwasprovidedon17October1991(unpublished).Thelistofcasesunder A :theState  % partysubmittedthaton1March1985,thecompetenceofthecivilcourtswasre-established.Theamnestylawof8 z & March1985_benefited_Ԁalltheindividualswhohadbeeninvolvedasauthors,accomplicesoraccessoryparticipantsof t ' politicalcrimesorcrimescommittedforpoliticalpurposes,from1January1962to1March1985.Thelawallowed n ( thoseindividualsheldresponsibleofintentionalmurdertohaveeithertheirsentencereviewedortheirconviction h ) reduced.Pursuanttoarticle10oftheLawonNationalPacificationalltheindividualsimprisonedunder measuresof b* securitywerereleased.Incasessubjectedtoreview,appellatecourtseitheracquittedorcondemnedtheindividuals. \+ ByvirtueofLaw15.783of20November1985alltheindividualswhohadpreviouslyheldapublicofficewereentitled V, toresumetheirjobs.Oncasesunder B :itstatesthattheseindividualswerepardonedbyvirtueofLaw15.737and P- releasedon10March1985.Oncasesunder C :theseindividualswerereleasedon14March1985;theircaseswere J. includedunderlaw15.737.Oncasesunder D :theamnestylawended,fromthedateonwhichitenteredintoforce, D/ theregimesforthesurveillanceofindividuals,pendingarrestwarrants,therestrictionstoenterorexitthecountry;and >0 everyofficialinquiryintocrimescoveredbytheamnesty.From8March1985,theissuanceoftraveldocumentswas 81 nolongersubjectedtoanyrestriction.Samuel_Lichtensztejn_,afterhisreturntoHungary,resumedhispositionasthe 22 HeadoftheUniversityoftheRepublic.Oncasesunder E :from1March1985,thepossibilitytofileanactionfor ,z3 damageswasopentoallofthevictimsofhumanrightsviolationswhichoccurredduringthedefactogovernment. & t4 From1985uptodate,36suitsindamageshavebeenfiled,22ofthemarerelatedtoarbitrarydetentionand12tothe  !n5 restitutionofproperty.TheGovernmentsettledMr.Lopezscaseon21November1990,bypayinghimUS$200,000. "h6 ThesuitfiledbyMs.Lilian_Celiberti_Ԁisstillpending.Besidestheabove-mentionedcases,noothervictimhasfileda   law-suitagainsttheStateclaimingcompensation.Oncasesunder F :on22December1986,theCongresspassedLaw  15.848,knownas theexpirationoftheStatepowerstoprosecute.ThelawextinguishedthepowerofState   authoritiestoprosecutecrimescommittedbymilitaryorpoliceagentsforpoliticalpurposesorintheexecutionoforders   giventothembytheirsuperiorsbefore1March1985.Allpendingproceedingswerediscontinued.On16April1989,   thelawwasconfirmedbyreferendum.Thelaworderedtheinvestigatingjudgestosendreportssubmittedtothe   judiciaryaboutvictimsofdisappearancestotheExecutive,forthelattertoinitiateinquiries. MD>&   DDD M 4DD#D 4159/1983,_Cariboni_   A/43/40   SelectedDecisionsvol.2 .DD DD . 6 .DDDD . .DDDD . .DDDD .X 0DDDDD 0X GDD6 DDD G 4DD# DD 4322/1988,A/51/40   _Rodrguez_   A/49/40 4DD# DD 4 4DD# DD 4 4DD# DD 4 4DD# DD 4X   A/51/40 6DDD# DD 6_X 9DD(  DDD 9... +DD DD + +DD DD + +DD DD + +DD DD + +DD !DD + -DDD "DD -_.$" #  DDD .