Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CAT - Russian Federation

Complete list of decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
E.E. v. Russian Federation 479/2011 24 May 2013 1 (1), 2 (3), 4 (1), 15 Inadmissible
Kirsanov v. Russian Federation 478/2011 14 May 2014 1, 4, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 22 Violation
X v. Russian Federation 542/2013 08 May 2015 3, 22 Violation
N.B. v. Russian Federation 577/2013 25 November 2015 22 (5) Inadmissible

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".