Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CAT - Netherlands

List of all final views

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
X. v. The Netherlands 36/1995 08 May 1996 3 No Violation
A. v. The Netherlands 91/1997 13 November 1998 3 Violation
A. D. v. The Netherlands 96/1997 12 November 1999 3 No Violation
M. K. O. v. The Netherlands 134/1999 09 May 2001 3 No Violation
S. S. and S. A. v. The Netherlands 142/1999 11 May 2001 3 No Violation
S.T. v. The Netherlands 175/2000 23 November 2001 3 No Violation
A. A. v. The Netherlands 198/2002 30 April 2003 3 No Violation
M. V. v. The Netherlands 201/2002 02 May 2003 3 No Violation
S. S. v. The Netherlands 191/2001 05 May 2003 3 No Violation
K. S. Y. v. The Netherlands 190/2001 15 May 2003 3 No Violation
A. R. v. The Netherlands 203/2002 14 November 2003 3 No Violation
S. G. v. The Netherlands 135/1999 12 May 2004 3 No Violation
M.C. v. Guinea and Netherlands 569/2013 13 November 2015 3 Violation
F.B. v. the Netherlands 613/2014 20 November 2015 3 Violation
P.A. v. Netherlands 611/2014 02 May 2016 3 No Violation
N.K. v. Netherlands 623/2014 01 May 2017 3, 22 No Violation

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".