The United Nations Human Rights Treaties


CAT - Norway

Complete list of decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
S. H. v. Norway 121/1998 19 November 1999   Inadmissible
Z. T. v. Norway 127/1999 19 November 1999   Inadmissible
Z.T. v. Norway 238/2003 14 November 2005 3 No Violation
H.S.T. v. Norway 288/2006 16 November 2006   Inadmissible
Ahmad Dar v. Norway 249/2004 11 May 2007 22 Violation
Eftekha v. Norway 312/2007 25 November 2011 3 Violation

Information in this section of is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".