Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CAT - Switzerland

List of all admissibility decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Outcome
X. v. Switzerland 17/1994 17 November 1994 Inadmissible
Y. v. Switzerland 18/1994 17 November 1994 Inadmissible
A. E. v. Switzerland 24/1995 02 May 1995 Inadmissible
H. W. A. v. Switzerland 48/1996 20 May 1998 Inadmissible
A. T. A. v. Switzerland 236/2003 11 November 2003 Inadmissible
R.T. v. Switzerland 242/2003 24 November 2005 Inadmissible
A. K. v. Switzerland 248/2004 08 May 2006 Inadmissible
F.M-M. v. Switzerland 399/2009 26 May 2011 Inadmissible
Z. v. Switzerland 545/2013 25 November 2015 Inadmissible
X et al. v. Switzerland 697/2015 25 November 2016 Inadmissible
X v. Switzerland 686/2015 05 December 2016 Inadmissible

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".