Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CAT - Switzerland

List of all decisions to discontinue

Case Name Comm Number Date
A.A. v. Switzerland 762/2016 20 July 2016
Y.M. v. Switzerland 664/2015 30 November 2016
M.H. and R.H. v. Switzerland 459/2011 30 November 2016
Hugues Mbele v. Switzerland 755/2016 31 July 2017
T.A. and T.F. v. Switzerland 667/2015 06 November 2017

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".