Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CAT - Tunisia

Complete list of decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
Barakat v. Tunisia 14/1994 05 May 1994   Inadmissible
Barakat v. Tunisia 60/1996 10 November 1999 11, 12, 13, 14 Violation
Dhaou Belgacem Thabti v. Tunisia 187/2001 14 November 2003 12, 13 Violation
Imed Abdelli v. Tunisia 188/2001 14 November 2003 12, 13 Violation
Bouabdallah Ltaief v. Tunisia 189/2001 14 November 2003 12, 13 Violation
Salem v. Tunisia 269/2005 07 November 2007 1, 12, 13, 14 Violation
Ali v. Tunisia 291/2006 21 November 2008 1, 2(1) Violation
Taoufik Elaiba v. Tunisia 551/2013 06 May 2016 1, 2, 11, 16, 22 Violation
Rached Jaidane v. Tunisia 654/2015 11 August 2017 1, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 2(1), 4(2) Violation

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".