Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CAT - Canada

List of all decisions to discontinue

Case Name Comm Number Date
S.M. v. Canada 630/2014 11 November 2016
A.L. v. Canada 588/2014 30 November 2016
P.N. v. Canada 457/2011 31 July 2017
N.H.Z. v. Canada 590/2014 31 July 2017
N.A.L. et al v. Canada 617/2014 31 July 2017
J.T. v. Canada 515/2012 10 August 2017
M.S.A. and D.A. v. Canada 711/2015 06 November 2017
K.D.S. v. Canada 597/2014 06 November 2017

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".