Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CAT - Denmark

List of all admissibility decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Outcome
Helle Jensen v. Denmark 202/2002 05 May 2004 Inadmissible
R. S. v. Denmark 225/2003 19 May 2004 Inadmissible
C.N. v. Denmark 709/2015 29 April 2016 Inadmissible
I.M. and V.Z. v. Denmark 593/2014 16 May 2016 Inadmissible
R.K. v. Denmark 607/2014 12 August 2016 Inadmissible

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".