Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CAT - Denmark

Complete list of decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
S.C. v. Denmark 143/1999 10 May 2000 3 No Violation
E. T. B. v. Denmark 146/1999 30 April 2002 3 No Violation
F. F. Z. v. Denmark 180/2001 30 April 2002 3 No Violation
M. O. v. Denmark 209/2002 12 November 2003 3 No Violation
V. R. v. Denmark 210/2002 17 November 2003 3 No Violation
Helle Jensen v. Denmark 202/2002 05 May 2004   Inadmissible
R. S. v. Denmark 225/2003 19 May 2004 3 Inadmissible
Amini v. Denmark 339/2008 15 November 2010 3 Violation
A.A. v. Denmark 412/2010 13 November 2012 2, 3 (1), 12, 16 (1) No Violation
K.H. v. Denmark 464/2011 23 November 2012 3 Violation
Sivagnanaratnam v. Denmark 429/2010 11 November 2013 3 No Violation
Alp v. Denmark 466/2011 14 May 2014 3 No Violation
X. v. Denmark 458/2011 28 November 2014 3 No Violation
Z. v. Denmark 555/2013 10 August 2015 3 No Violation
M.S. v. Denmark 571/2013 10 August 2015 3 No Violation
F.K. v. Denmark 580/2014 23 November 2015 3, 12, 16 Violation
C.N. v. Denmark 709/2015 29 April 2016 3 Inadmissible
J. N. v. Denmark 628/2014 13 May 2016 3, 22 Violation
I.M. and V.Z. v. Denmark 593/2014 16 May 2016 3, 22 Inadmissible
R.K. v. Denmark 607/2014 12 August 2016 3 Inadmissible
M.B., A.B., D.M.B. and D.B. v. Denmark 634/2014 25 November 2016 3 Violation
S.S.B. v. Denmark 602/2014 28 April 2017 3, 22 No Violation
G.I. v. Denmark 625/2014 10 August 2017 3  

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".