Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CAT - France

Complete list of decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
N.D. v. France 32/1995 20 November 1995   Inadmissible
Le Gayic et al. v. France 46/1996 09 May 1997   Inadmissible
D. v. France 45/1996 10 November 1997   Inadmissible
R. v. France 52/1996 10 November 1997   Inadmissible
Arkauz v. France 63/1997 09 November 1999 3 Violation
K.N. v. France 93/1997 18 November 1999   Inadmissible
P. E. v. France 193/2001 21 November 2002 15 No Violation
I.S.D. v. France 194/2001 03 May 2005 3 No Violation
Brada v. France 195/2002 17 May 2005 3 Violation
Tebourski v. France 300/2006 01 May 2007 3, 22 Violation
A. B. A. O. v. France 264/2005 08 November 2007   Inadmissible
A.M. v. France 302/2006 05 May 2010 3 No Violation
Mikel Kabikoitz Carrera Sarobe v. France 675/2015 10 November 2017 15 No Violation

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".