The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Case Name	Comm Number	Date	Articles	Outcome
Arkauz v. France	63/1997	09 November 1999	3	Violation
P. E. v. France	193/2001	21 November 2002	15	No Violation
I.S.D. v. France	194/2001	03 May 2005	3	No Violation
Brada v. France	195/2002	17 May 2005	3	Violation
Tebourski v. France	300/2006	01 May 2007	3, 22	Violation

Information is as of 26 September 2008.

CERD, CCPR, CAT, CEDAW, CMW, Disability Convention and Enforced disappearances Convention have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW and Enforced disappearances Convention complaint mechanisms are not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
decisions to deal jointly with cases
admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
final views.

The Human Rights Committee (under CCPR), the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (under CERD), the Committee Against Torture (under CAT) and the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (under CEDAW) also formally follow up on final Views where a violation has been found. This information is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".