Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CAT - Germany

Complete list of decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
M. A. K. v. Germany 214/2002 12 May 2004 3 No Violation
Abichou v. Germany 430/2010 21 May 2013 3, 22 (5(a)) Violation
E.M. v. Germany 636/2014 06 November 2017 3 Admissable (discontinued)

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".