|
|
Jurisprudence
CAT - Kazakhstan
List of all final views
|
Case Name |
Comm Number |
Date |
Articles |
Outcome |
| Abdussamatov et al v. Kazakhstan |
444/2010 |
01 June 2012 |
3 |
Violation |
| Evloev v. Kazakhston |
441/2010 |
05 November 2013 |
1, 2, 12, 13, 14, 15 |
Violation |
| Nasirov v. Kazakhstan |
475/2011 |
14 May 2014 |
3, 6, 7 |
Violation |
| Bairamov v. Kazakhstan |
497/2012 |
14 May 2014 |
1, 2, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 |
Violation |
| N.Z. v. Kazakhstan |
495/2012 |
28 November 2014 |
1, 12, 13, 22 |
No Violation |
| Tursunov v. Kazakstan |
538/2013 |
08 May 2015 |
3, 22 |
Violation |
| X v. Kazakhstan |
554/2013 |
03 August 2015 |
3, 6, 7, 22 |
Violation |
| Ashim Rakishev and Dmitry Rakishev v. Kazakhstan |
661/2015 |
31 July 2017 |
1,11,12,13,14, 2(1) |
Violation |
| Vladislav Chelakh v. Kazakhstan |
2645/2015 |
07 November 2017 |
9 (1) and 14 (1) and (3) (b), (d) and (g) |
Violation |
Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.
CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.
Included in this section are:
- requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
- decisions to deal jointly with cases
- admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
- final views.
Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".
|
