Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CAT - Australia

List of all decisions to discontinue

Case Name Comm Number Date
S.R. v. Australia 626/2014 30 November 2016
K.S. v. Australia 603/2014 30 November 2016
T.K. v. Australia 707/2015 06 November 2017
K.V. v. Australia 714/2015 10 November 2017

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".