Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - Austria

List of all final views

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
Pauger v. Austria 415/1990 26 March 1992 26 Violation
Pauger v. Austria 716/1996 25 March 1999 26 Violation
Karakurt v. Austria 965/2000 04 April 2002 25, 26 Violation
Weiss v. Austria 1086/2002 03 April 2003 2(3), 14(1) Violation
Althammer et al. v. Austria 998/2001 08 August 2003 26 No Violation
Wallman v. Austria 1002/2001 01 April 2004 22, 22(1) No Violation
G. Pohl et al. v. Austria 1160/2003 09 July 2004 26 No Violation
Perterer v. Austria 1015/2001 20 July 2004 14(1) Violation
Deisl v. Austria 1060/2002 27 July 2004 26 No Violation
Lederbauer v. Austria 1454/2006 13 July 2007 14(1) Violation
Jenny v. Austria 1437/2005 09 July 2008 14(1) No Violation
Weiss v. Austria 1821/2008 12 October 2012 7, 14(5) No Violation

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".