Jurisprudence
CCPR - Lithuania
Complete list of decisions
|
Case Name |
Comm Number |
Date |
Articles |
Outcome |
| Gelazauskas v. Lithuania |
836/1998 |
17 March 2003 |
14(5) |
Violation |
| Filpovich v. Lithuania |
875/1999 |
04 August 2003 |
14(3c), 15(1) |
Violation |
| Kleckovski v. Lithuania |
1285/2004 |
24 July 2007 |
|
Inadmissible |
| T.J. v. Lithuania |
1911/2009 |
25 March 2013 |
14(3)(c) |
Inadmissible |
| Jusinskas v. Lithuania |
2014/2010 |
28 October 2013 |
2(2)(3), 14(1), 25(c) |
Inadmissible |
| G.J. v. Lithuania |
1894/2009 |
25 March 2014 |
7, 9, 10, 14 |
Inadmissible |
| Paksas v. Lithuania |
2155/2012 |
25 March 2014 |
14, 15, 25 |
Violation |
| V.S. v. Lithuania |
2437/2014 |
23 July 2015 |
14(1,2,5,7), 15(1) |
Inadmissible |
Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.
CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.
Included in this section are:
- requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
- decisions to deal jointly with cases
- admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
- final views.
Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".
|
