Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - Mauritius

List of all admissibility decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Outcome
L. G. v. Mauritius 354/1989 31 October 1990 Inadmissible
Poongavanam v. Mauritius 567/1993 26 July 1994 Inadmissible
Gobin v. Mauritius 787/1997 16 July 2001 Inadmissible
Hussain v. Mauritius 980/2001 18 March 2003 Inadmissible

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".