Bayefsky.com

The United Nations Human Rights Treaties

Jurisprudence

CCPR - Mauritius

Complete list of decisions

Case Name Comm Number Date Articles Outcome
Mauritian women v. Mauritius 35/1978 09 April 1981 2(1), 3, 17(1), 23(1), 25, 26 Violation
L. G. v. Mauritius 354/1989 31 October 1990   Inadmissible
Poongavanam v. Mauritius 567/1993 26 July 1994 14(1) Inadmissible
Gobin v. Mauritius 787/1997 16 July 2001   Inadmissible
Hussain v. Mauritius 980/2001 18 March 2003 14(3b,d) Inadmissible
Narrain et al v. Mauritius 1744/2008 27 July 2012 18, 25, 26 Violation

Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.

CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.

Included in this section are:

  1. requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
  2. decisions to deal jointly with cases
  3. admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
  4. final views.

Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".