|
|
Jurisprudence
CCPR - Nepal
Complete list of decisions
|
Case Name |
Comm Number |
Date |
Articles |
Outcome |
| Sharma v. Nepal |
1469/2006 |
28 October 2008 |
2(3), 6, 7, 9, 10 |
Violation |
| Sobhraj v. Nepal |
1870/2009 |
27 July 2010 |
7, 10(1), 14(2,3a-f,5,7), 15(1) |
Violation |
| Giri v. Nepal |
1761/2008 |
24 March 2011 |
2(3), 7, 9, 10(1) |
Violation |
| Maharjan v. Nepal |
1863/2009 |
19 July 2012 |
2(3), 7, 9, 10(1) |
Violation |
| Sedhai v. Nepal |
1865/2009 |
19 July 2013 |
2, 6, 7, 9 |
Violation |
| Chaulagain v. Nepal |
2018/2010 |
28 October 2014 |
2, 6, 7, 9, 10, 26 |
Violation |
| Basnet v. Nepal |
2051/2011 |
29 October 2014 |
7, 9, 10, 16 |
Violation |
| Bhandari v. Nepal |
2031/2011 |
29 October 2014 |
6, 7, 9, 10, 16 |
Violation |
| Tripathi v. Nepal |
2111/2011 |
29 October 2014 |
6, 7, 9, 10 |
Violation |
| Katwal v. Nepal |
2000/2010 |
01 April 2015 |
2, 6, 7, 9, 10, 16 |
Violation |
| Tharu et al v. Nepal |
2038/2011 |
03 July 2015 |
6, 7, 10, 16, 17, 23 24 |
Violation |
| A.S. v. Nepal |
2077/2011 |
06 November 2015 |
7, 9(1, 2, 5), 10(1), 17, 2(3) |
Violation |
| Sabita Basnet v. Nepal |
2164/2012 |
12 July 2016 |
10, 16, 6, 7, 9 |
Violation |
| Ray Maya Nakarmi v. Nepal |
2184/2012 |
10 March 2017 |
10, 16, 2(3), 24(1), 6, 7, 9 |
Violation |
| Purna Maya v. Nepal |
2245/2013 |
17 March 2017 |
10(1), 2(1), 2(3), 26, 3, 7, 9 |
Violation |
| Purna Maya v. Nepal |
2245/2013 |
17 March 2017 |
10(1), 2(1), 2(3), 26, 3, 7, 9 |
Violation |
| Neupane et al. v. Nepal |
2170/2012 |
21 July 2017 |
10, 16, 2(3), 6, 7 |
Violation |
| Dhakal et al v. Nepal |
2185/2012 |
17 March 2018 |
10, 16, 2(3), 24(1), 6, 7, 9 |
Violation |
| Sarita Devi Sharma et al. v. Nepal |
2364/2014 |
06 April 2018 |
2 (3), 6, 7, 9 (1–4), 10 (1), 16, 17, 23 (1) and 24 (1) |
Violation |
Information in this section of Bayefsky.com is as of May 2018. To update use the UN website search engine here.
CERD, CCPR, CESCR, CEDAW, CAT, CRC, CMW, CRPD and CED all have optional complaint mechanisms, whereby an individual may complain to the respective treaty body that his or her rights under the treaty have been violated. The CMW complaint mechanism is not yet in force.
Included in this section are:
- requests made by the treaty body for interim measures
- decisions to deal jointly with cases
- admissibility decisions (normally decisions determining a complaint is admissible are not issued separately and hence this category involves decisions in which complaints are found to be inadmissible)
- final views.
Information on follow-up of final Views where a violation has been found is included in the section entitled "Follow-up: Jurisprudence".
|
